Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 26))

  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

Rather than focusing on different approaches to language acquisition, this collection of papers investigates two specific linguistic phenomena from an acquisition point of view. Observations on the acquisition of scrambling or pronominal clitics can be found in the literature, but up until the recent past they were sparse and often buried in other issues. This volume fills a long existing gap in providing a collection of articles that target acquisition while giving a more complete view of the overarching syntactic issues involved. It also provides an overview of L1 and L2 acquisition data from a number of different languages as well as from different theoretical points of view with these two clause-internal processes at the center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belletti, A.: 1993, ‘Case Checking and Clitic Placement: Three Issues on (Italian/Romance) Clitics’,GenGenP 1 (2), 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, A.: to appear, ’(Italian/Romance) Clitics: Structure and Derivation’, In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.) Clitics in the Languages of Europe.EUROTYP 8, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H.: 1984,Parametric Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. and K. Wexler: 1987, ‘The maturation of syntax’, in T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds.),Parameter setting, Reidel, Dordrecht, 123–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. F.: 1973.Early Syntactic Development: A Crosslinguistic Study with Special Reference to Finnish . Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. F.: 1990, ‘Mapping Thematic Roles onto Syntactic Functions. Are Children Helped by Innate Linking Rules?’Linguistics 28 (6), 1253–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. W., and C. Fraser: 1963, ‘The acquisition of syntax’, In C. N. Cofer & B. S. Musgrave (eds.)Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. W.: 1973. AFirst Language: The Early Stages . Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinaletti, A. and M. Starke: 1995, ‘The Tripartition of Pronouns and Its Acquisition: Principle B Puzzles are Ambiguity Problems’, in J. Beckman (ed.)NELS 25, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E.: 1985, ‘The Acquisition of Romance with Special Reference to French’, in D. Slobin (ed.)The Cross-linguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 687–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, J., T. Roeper and A. Vainikka: 1990, The Acquisition of Long-distance Rules. In L. Frazier & J. deVilliers (eds.)Language Processing and Language Acquisition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 257–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, S.W.: 1991, Language Acquisition as a Maturational Process, In Weissenborn, J., Goodluck, H, and Roeper, T. (eds.)Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedemann, M.-A.: 1992, ‘The Underlying Position of External Arguments in French’,GenGenP 0 (1–2), 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedemann, M.-A.: 1995, ‘Sujets syntaxiques; positions, inversions et pro’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.S.: 1967, `Topicalization in child language’,Foundations of Language 3, 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, M.T.: 1992, ‘Verb Syntax in Italian Child Grammar’,GenGenP 0 (1–2), 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, E. and M. Noonan: 1988, ‘Functional Categories and Language Acquisition’. Paper presented atThe Boston University Conference on Language Development .

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, E. and M. Noonan: 1992, ‘Functional Categories and Language Acquisition’,Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37, 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, L.: 1996, ‘Root Infinitives, Clitics and Truncated Structures’, in H. Clahsen (ed.)Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition . John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 271–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, C., L. Rizzi, and U. Frauenfelder: 1996, ‘The Acquisition of Subject and Object Clitics in French’, in H. Clahsen (ed.)Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition . John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, M. and J. Weissenborn: 1991, ‘Clitic and Affix Interaction in Early Romance’, paper presented at the16th Boston University Conference on Language Development, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N.: 1996, ‘The Underspecification of Functional Categories in Early Grammar’, In H. Clahsen (ed.)Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition . John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 91–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowicz, C., N. Müller, O.-K. Kang, B. Riemer, and C. Rigaut: 1996, ‘On the Acquisition of the Pronominal System in French and German’, in A. Stringfellowet al . (eds.)Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 20, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G.: 1994, ‘More about INFL-ection and Agreement: The Acquisition of Clitic Pronouns in French’, in J. Meisel (ed.)Bilingual First Language Acquisition. French and German Grammatical Development . John Benjamins, Amsterdam. 131–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1975,French Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1994,The Antisymmetry of Syntax . MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornfilt, J.: 1994, ‘Some remarks on the interaction of Case and Word Order in Turkish: Implications for Acquisition’, In B. Lustet al . (eds.)Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 171–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, U. and M. Ozeki: 1996, The case of the Missing particle: Object Case Assignment and Scrambling in the early Grammar of Japanese’, In Stringfellowet al . (eds.)Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 20, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D.: 1988, Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J.: 1990, ‘INFL-ection: Subjects and Subject-Verb Agreement in Early Child Language’, in J. Meisel (ed.)Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children, Foris, Dordrecht. 237–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J. (ed.) 1992:The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J. and N. Miller: 1992, ‘Finiteness and Verb Placement in Early Child Grammars: Evidence from Simultaneous Acquisition of French and German Bilinguals’, in J. Meisel (ed.)The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 109–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, N.: 1994, ‘Parameters Cannot be Reset, Evidence from the Development of Comp’, in J. Meisel (ed.)Bilingual First Language Acquisition. French and German Grammatical Development . John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 235–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsu, Y.: 1994, Early acquisition of Scrambling in Japanese, In Hoekstra, T.and B. Schwartz (eds.)Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T.-Z.: 1971, ‘A Study of German Language Development’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, Z.: 1991, `Pronominal Clitics in Bernese Swiss and their Structural Position. Evidence from the acquisition process’, in H. van Riemsdijk and L. Rizzi (eds.) Clitics and their Hosts.EUROTYP Working Papers, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, A.: 1989, ‘On the Emergence of Syntax: A Cross-linguistic Study’, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, A.: 1992,Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeppel, D. and K. Wexler: 1993, ‘The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German’,Language 69, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, S. M.: 1996, ‘The Growth of the Phrase Marker: Evidence from Subjects’. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1986, `Small Children’s Small Clauses’.Transactions of the Philological Society 86, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1990,Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1996, Towards a Structure-building Model of Acquisition. In H. Clahsen (ed.)Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 43–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1986, ‘On the Status of Subject Clitics in Romance’, in O. Jaeggli and C. Silva-Corvalan (eds.)Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris, Dordrect. 391–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T.: 1973, `Connecting children’s language and linguistic theory’. In T. E. Moore, (ed.)Cognitive development and the acquisition of language . Academic Press, New York, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T.: 1992, ‘From the Initial State to V2: Acquisition Principles in Action’, In J. Meisel (ed.)The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 333–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T.: 1996, ‘Merger Theory and Formal Features in Acquisition’, In H. Clahsen (ed.)Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 415–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönenberger, M., Z. Penner and J. Weissenbom: 1997, ‘Object Placement and Early German Grammar’, InProceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siloni, T.:1994, ‘Noun Phrases and Nominalizations’. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Geneva. Speas, M: 1994, Null Arguments in a Theory of Economy of Projection.University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1992, ‘Clitic constructions’, ms., UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrdinsson, H.:1996, ‘On the (Non-)Universality of Functional Categories’, In W. Abrahamet al . (eds.)Minimal Ideas:Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsimpli, I-M.: 1991, `On the Maturation of functional Categories: Early Child Speech’.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenborn, J., M. Verripps and R. Berman: 1989, ‘Negation as a Window to the Structure of Early Child Language’, ms. Max-Planck Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbom, J.: 1990, ‘Functional Categories and Verb Movement: The Acquisition of German Syntax Reconsidered’, in M. Rothweiler (ed.) Spracherwerb und Grammatik. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morphologie.Linguistische Berichte,Special Issue 3, 190–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K.: 1996, ‘What ChildrenDon’t Know Really Tells Us a Lot about Linguistic Theory’, paper presented at WCHTSALT, OTS, Utrecht. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K.: 1997, ‘Explanatory Models of Language Acquisition’, plenary talk presented atGALA, Edinburgh. April.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.: 1996, ‘Clitics in L2-French’, in H. Clahsen (ed.)Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition, Benjamins, Amsterdam, 335–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, C. J-W.: 1993, ‘Dutch Syntax’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Powers, S.M., Hamann, C. (2000). The Acquisition of Clause-Internal Rules. In: Powers, S.M., Hamann, C. (eds) The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3232-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3232-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5432-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3232-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics