Skip to main content

Soundness and Completeness Theorems for Tense Logic

  • Chapter
  • 119 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 111))

Abstract

The central task of this chapter is to show the Soundness and Completeness of our axiomatizations of the various tense logic systems. This amounts to showing that a statement A is provable (in a given system) from a set S of statements if and only if S entails A (in that system). The upshot of this result is the exact correspondence of the syntactical-deductive and the semantic accounts given for the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The general outlines of our Soundness and Completeness proofs are due to Makinson, 1966 and Leblanc, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. It is a routine matter, familiar from standard treatments of classical logic, to arrange the statements of a system in a definite order, So we feel free to speak here of the alphabetical place of a statement in such an ordering, and presume the statements of Kt to have been so ordered. We shall also assume that this ordering is based on the complexity of a statement, so, e.g., A preceeds —A, A and B preceed A D B, and A preceeds FB and PB.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S certain to be of cardinality alepho, hence the appropriateness of the superscript.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This ordering of the members of Sls -- and assigning them indices based upon it — is necessitated by the fact that two such sets may have identical memberships. The ordering, found in McArthur, 1972, Appendix I, assigns to each set a positive integer, An upshot of this procedure is the denumerability of 12s no matter what the initial set S. Hence S2 in the constructed historical moment (n, R, P) is sure to be denumerable (at most), and thus a Lowenheim-Skolem Theorem is available for K t insofar as this shows it to have a denumerable model.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Since we presume the statements of Kt to have an alphabetical order based on complexity (see note 2) we can run this induction on the complexity of A.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See McArthur and Leblanc, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McArthur, R.P. (1976). Soundness and Completeness Theorems for Tense Logic. In: Tense Logic. Synthese Library, vol 111. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3219-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3219-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8345-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3219-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics