Skip to main content

Alcohol and tobacco taxes: criteria for harmonisation

  • Chapter
Tax Coordination in the European Community

Abstract

This paper is concerned with some of the major issues of economic principle that arise in trying to construct a coherent framework for the taxation of alcoholic drinks and tobacco products. This is not, of course, the enterprise on which the European Community is currently embarked. Instead there has been frequent resort to the simple pragmatism which says that convergence should proceed ‘... by reference to the points of departure rather than to a point of arrival’ (Commission, 1980, para. 15). But this position, which attaches significance only to the process and the fact of harmonisation and none to what it is that the Community ultimately harmonises on, is clearly untenable. Nor is it consistently adopted: the discussion of routes to harmonisation is in fact heavily influenced by references to both general principles of taxation and the effects of alternative regimes on producers and consumers. The purpose here is to provide a clearer basis for the articulation of these arguments. We begin by recalling the context and nature of the principal controversies.

The authors are grateful to Piervincenzo Bondonio, Sijbren Cnossen and other conference participants for their helpful comments; remaining errors are their own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. ‘Smoking and the Economics of Government Intervention.’ In Perlman, Mark (ed.). The Economics of Health and Medical Care. London and New York: Macmillan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. and Stiglitz, Joseph E. ‘The Design of Tax Structure: Direct Versus Indirect Taxation.’ Journal of Public Economics, 6, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, Alan J. ‘The Theory of Excess Burden and Optimal Taxation.’ National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 1025, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Yoram. ‘An Alternative Approach to the Analysis of Taxation.’ Journal of Political Economy, 84, 6, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, Sijbren. ‘Issues in Excise Taxation: The Alcohol Problem.’ In Roskamp, Karl W. and Forte, Francesco (eds). Reforms of Tax Systems. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, Sijbren. ‘Harmonization of Indirect Taxes in the EEC In McLure, Charles E. Jr (ed.). Tax Assignment in Federal Countries. Canberra: ANU Press, 1983. Reprinted in British Tax Review, 4, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, Sijbren. ‘Tax Structure Developments.’ Chapter 1, this volume, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, Sijbren and Shoup, Carl S. ‘Coordination of Value-Added Taxes.’ Chapter 2, this volume, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. ‘Explanatory Memorandum’ to ‘Proposal for a Council Directive Amending Directive 72/464/EEC on Taxes other than Turnover Taxes which Affect the Consumption of Manufactured Tobacco’. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. ‘Completing the Internal Market.’ White Paper from the Commission to the European Council. Brussels, 1985a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. ‘Proposal for a Council Directive Laying Down Certain Rules on Indirect Taxes which Affect the Consumption of Alcoholic Drinks.’ Official Journal of the European Communities, C 114 of 8.5.85, 1985b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court of Justice of the European Communities. ‘Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.’ Judgement in Case 170/78. Reports 7, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus. ‘The Distance Function in Consumer Behaviour with Applications to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation.’ Review of Economic Studies, 46, 3, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus. ‘Optimal Taxes and the Structure of Preferences.’ Econometrica, 49, 5, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus and Muellbauer, John. Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash K. and Stiglitz, Joseph E. ‘Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.’ American Economic Review, 67, 3, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. ‘Report on the Communication from the Commission to the Council.’ Document 1-1121/83, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W.M. ‘A Possible Procedure for Analysing Differentials in the Egg Market.’ Review of Economic Studies, 47, 5, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M., Plant, M. and Williams, A. Economics and Alcohol: Consumption and Control. London: Croom Helm, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Jeffrey E. ‘Taxing Tar and Nicotine.’ American Economic Review, 70, 3, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, John A. and Keen, Michael J. The Structure of Tobacco Taxes in the European Community. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, John A. and Keen, Michael J. ‘How Should Commodities be Taxed?’ European Economic Review, 23, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, John A. and Keen, Michael J. ‘Commodity Taxation for Maximum Revenue.’ Mimeograph, 1985a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, John A. and Keen, Michael J. ‘Alcohol and Tobacco Taxes in the European Community: Criteria for Harmonisation.’ Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper 73, 1985b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, Michael J. ‘Welfare Effects of Commodity Tax Harmonisation.’ Mimeograph, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Kelvin J. ‘A New Approach to Consumer Theory.’ Journal of Political Economy, 74, 2, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Alan and O’Brien, Bernard. ‘Harmonisation Policies in the European Community and Alcohol Abuse.’ British Journal of Addiction, 77, 3, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Tony. ‘The Demand for Beer, Spirits and Wine in the UK, 1956–1979.’ In Grant, M., Plant, M. and Williams, A. Economics and Alcohol: Consumption and Control. London: Croom Helm, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, John W. ‘The Rationale for Special Taxes on Alcohol: A Critique.’ British Tax Review, 6, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Brendan M. ‘The Demand for Alcohol in the UK: A Comment.’ The Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 4, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kay, J., Keen, M. (1987). Alcohol and tobacco taxes: criteria for harmonisation. In: Cnossen, S. (eds) Tax Coordination in the European Community. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3206-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3206-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-3208-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3206-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics