Skip to main content
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

An appraisal of the above material will now be made in the light of the question whether the practices of the Asian nations dealt with above have contributed positively — or perhaps negatively — to the development of international law.1 It is proposed here to discuss this matter under the following headings:

  1. (1)

    The attitudes of the Asian states as appear from their past practices.

  2. (2)

    The contributions of these states to the development of international law.

  3. (3)

    Some speculations on their future attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. See supra at 25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See e.g. quotation of Brierly in Chapter I supra at 21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kennan, “Peaceful Coexistence — A Western View,” 38 For. Alf. 172 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reports I.C.J. 47–109 at 53 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  5. In Africa too reference is frequently made to ancient empires, e.g. the Mali empire.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Supra at 121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Supra at 163.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Supra at 175.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. N. Doc. No. A/Conf. 13/L. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stone, Aggression and World Order, 143 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Kennan, supra note 3, at 190.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahadevan makes the statement that “politics must be fair.” Mahadevan, “India’s Policy of Non-Alignment,” 2 I.Y.I.A. 97 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Supra at 23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Supra at 92.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krishna Chettiar v. Subbiya Chettiar, High Court of Burma, 5 April 1948, Annual Digest 537–548, at 544 (Case no. 178) (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maung Maung, Burma in the Family of Nations 101 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Id. at 128.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thayer, Southeast Asia in the Coming World, 244 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Nehru’s rejection of arbitration in the Kashmir case, supra at 166. 20 See infra at 233.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, The Right of Passage over Indian Territory, 6–24 and 46–55 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brierly, The Law of Nations 44 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Chapter I, supra at 17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lyon-Caen, “International Law and the Coexistence, in a State of Peace, of States with Opposing Political Systems,” 79 Journal du Droit Int. 53 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See supra at 201.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Becker, in an address made before the Am. Soc. Int. Law, Washington 26 April 1958, 38 Dept. of State Bull. 835 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fortunately, Mr. Becker’s statement does not seem to be very representative of U.S. opinion. Mr. Dean, the Head of the American delegation said in his closing statement that “Every country must be the judge of its own position and needs, and, while we are disappointed, we have nothing to say about the decision made here.” 38 Dept. of State Bull. 1110 (1958). See also Jessup, “The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea, ” 52 A.1.I.L 731 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  27. See the Synoptical Table of Some Asian Claims, supra at 204.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See for a similar attitude of Russia after the Revolution, Snyder and Bracht, “Coexistence and International Law,” 7 LC.L.Q.55 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tearbook LC..J. 233–256 (1959–1960).

    Google Scholar 

  30. onal law.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See e.g. Chapter II supra note 3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. The principle of “weighted voting” has become more popular now. S3 Goodwin, “The expanding U. N.,” 36 Int. Aff. 182–185 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fifield, The Diplomacy of Southeast Asia, 164, 213–214 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Id. at 110, 175–176, 498.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Supra at 234.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Min. of Foreign Affairs of the Rep. of Indonesia, Bulletin of the Asian-African Conference (no. 1) at 3 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Kahin, The Asian-African Conference, 32–33 and 36–38 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Supra at 232.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hafez Ghanem, “The Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee,” 14 Revue Egypt. de Droit Int. 63 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Takayanagi and Tanaka, “The First Session of the Asian Legal Consultative Committee,” 2.J.A.I.L. 110–124 at 110. (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Such views were also heard at the Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea, among others by the Ceylonese delegate.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Takayanagi and Tanaka, supra note 41, at 111.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Id. at 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hafez Ghanem, supra note 40, at 65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1961 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Syatauw, J.J.G. (1961). Conclusions. In: Some Newly Established Asian States and the Development of International Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3192-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3192-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0519-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3192-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics