Skip to main content

Algebraic Semantics

  • Chapter
  • 499 Accesses

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 13))

Abstract

In the preceding chapter, we introduced and investigated at some length several classes of algebraic structures, claiming that there exists a correspondence between the diagram of logics in Table 2.2 and the diagram of algebras in Table 5.1. Our present task will be to show that our claim was sound. In fact, we shall prove completeness theorems for most of the Hilbert-style calculi of Chapter 2 using the algebraic structures of Chapter 5. Subsequently, we shall see that — at least in some cases — such classes of structures are even too large for our purposes: due to the representation results of Chapter 5, in fact, the theorems of the logics at issue coincide with the formulae which are valid in a smaller (and usually much easier to tinker with) class of structures. In a few lucky cases, it will be sufficient to consider a single manageable structure, just as it happens for classical logic (even though this structure may not be just as simple and wieldy). Finally, we shall quickly browse through some applications of algebraic semantics to the solution of purely syntactical problems concerning our substructural calculi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Yet Meyer and Slaney, who published an independent proof of the latter result in the same year, should be awarded a chronological priority, since a typescript of their proof was already circulating in the early 1980’s.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ursini (1995) develops both an algebraic and a phase semantics for linear logic with exponentials using structures which are not necessarily complete as lattices.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A patent abuse of language is being committed here. By saying that S has the single model property, of course, we do not mean that it is enough to consider a single model of a certain kind in order to check whether a formula is S-provable, but that it suffices to focus on all models on a single structure.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paoli, F. (2002). Algebraic Semantics. In: Substructural Logics: A Primer. Trends in Logic, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3179-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3179-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6014-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3179-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics