Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 22))

Abstract

The modern viewpoint on quantities goes back at least to Newton’s Universal Arithmetick. Newton asserts that the relation between any two quantities of the same kind can be expressed by a real, positive number.2 In 1901, O. Hoelder gave a set of ‘Axiome der Quantitaet’, which are sufficient to establish an isomorphism between any realization of his axioms and the additive semigroup of all positive real numbers. Related work of Hilbert, Veronese and others is indicative of a general interest in the subject of quantities in the abstract on the part of mathematicians of this period. During the last thirty years, from another direction, philosophers of science have become interested in the logical analysis of empirical procedures of measurement.3 The interests of these two groups overlap insofar as the philosophers have been concerned to state the formal conditions which must be satisfied by empirical operations measuring some characteristic of physical objects (or other entities). Philosophers have divided quantities (that is, entities or objects considered relatively to a given characteristic, such as mass, length or hardness) into two kinds. Intensive quantities are those which can merely be arranged in a serial order; extensive quantities are those for which a “natural” operation of addition or combination can also be specified. Another, more exact, way of making a distinction of this order is to say that intensive quantities are quantities to which numbers can be assigned uniquely up to a monotone transformation, and extensive quantities are quantities to which numbers can be assigned uniquely up to a similarity transformation (that is, multiplication by a positive constant).4 This last condition may be said to be the criterion of formal adequacy for a system of extensive quantities.

Reprinted from Portugaliae Mathematica 10 (1951), 163–172.

I am grateful to J. C. C. McKinsey for a number of helpful suggestions in connection with the present paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Newton (1769, p. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The work of Norman R. Campbell (1920) and (1928) has been outstanding in this direction.

    Google Scholar 

  3. It may be remarked that this traditional classification is not very satisfactory, since there are also quantities which are assigned numbers uniquely up to a variety of other groups of transformations. However, this issue is irrelevant here, since we are solely concerned with extensive quantities in the sense just defined, and the problem of precisely how many formally different kinds of quantities it is useful to distinguish need not concern us.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This criticism would also seem to apply to the axioms for the measurement of utility given by J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern (1947): ‘=’ should designate the relation of indifference rather than that of identity.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For some aspects of this debate, see Russell ( 1903, Chaps. 19, 20) and Nagel (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I would now call Metatheorem A the ‘Representation theorem’ for extensive quantities, and Metatheorem B the ‘Uniqueness theorem’.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Another method of proof of this metatheorem is to show that 9)1/C can be uniquely embedded in an Archimedean, simply ordered group. And it is well known (see Birkhoff, 1948) that any such group is isomorphic to a subgroup of the additive group of all real numbers.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Padoa (1901); a clear statement of this principle is also to be found in McKinsey (1935).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suppes, P. (1969). A Set of Independent Axioms for Extensive Quantities. In: Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Synthese Library, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3173-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3173-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8320-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3173-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics