Skip to main content

Information on within-field variability from sequences of yield maps: multivariate classification as a first step of interpretation

  • Chapter
Soil and Water Quality at Different Scales

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 80))

  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

It is shown that automated pattern recognition applied to a series of yield maps can be used to divide a field into regions within which yields show similar between-season variation. These regions are associated with particular soil types. Such a regionalisation may be a useful way of recognising important within-field scales of variability, and may be a useful first step in interpretation to develop a management response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bezdek JC Ehrlich R and Full W (1984) FCM: The fuzzy c-Means clustering algorithm. Computers and Geosciences, 10: 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burrough PA (1989) Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. Journal of Soil Science, 40: 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finke PA and Goense D (1993) Differences in barley grain yields as a result of soil variability. Journal of Agricultural Science, 120: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kachanoski RG and Fairchild GL (1996) Field scale fertiliser recommendations: the spatial scaling problem. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 76: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mercer WB and Hall AD (1911) The experimental error of field trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4: 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McBratney AB and Moore AW (1985) Application of fuzzy sets to climatic classification. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 35: 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McBratney AB, De Gruiter JJ and Brus DJ (1992) Spacial prediction and mapping of continuous soil classes. Geoderma, 54: 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MINITAB (1988) Minitab reference manual,Release 6. Minitab Inc., Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stafford JV, Ambler B, Lark RM and Catt J (1996) Mapping and interpreting the yield variation in cereal crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 14: 101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter A. Finke Johan Bouma Marcel R. Hoosbeek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lark, R.M., Stafford, J.V. (1998). Information on within-field variability from sequences of yield maps: multivariate classification as a first step of interpretation. In: Finke, P.A., Bouma, J., Hoosbeek, M.R. (eds) Soil and Water Quality at Different Scales. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3021-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3021-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5012-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3021-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics