Abstract
Issues of environmental sustainability, limits to growth and opportunity, introduction of new technology, and the economic and social costs of resource degradation have forced more proactive integration of biophysical and socio-economic data. Natural resources management, including soil, water and land quality, involve balancing the often conflicting objectives of food and fibre production under scenarios of increasing demand, while increasing economic efficiency and maintaining the quality of the environment. It involves integration of data from several disparate disciplines, scaling the data to make them compatible on input, identifying strategic indicators, criteria and thresholds with which to assess the state and performance of the system, and the application of biophysical and economic optimisation models to examine the impacts and trade-offs of alternate management options. However, some basic questions of scales and hierarchies still have to be resolved, e.g. how to “scale-up” the biophysical data to the level at which public policy is formulated without losing the integrity of the data. This paper examines these and related issues by discussing the theories and principles of spatial and temporal hierarchies and scales, and providing some examples of application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen TFH & Hoekstra TW (1990) The confusion between scale-defined levels and conventional levels of organisation in ecology. J. Veget. Sc. 1: 5–12
Allen TFH, O’Neill RV & Hoekstra TW (1984) Interlevel relationships in ecological research and management: Some working principles from Hierarchy Theory. General Tech Rpt. RM-110. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO, USA
Antic JM & Wagenet RJ (1995) Why scientists should talk to economists. Agron. Jour. 87: 1033–1040
Bouma J & Hoosbeek MR (1996) The contribution and importance of soil scientists in interdisciplinary studies dealing with land. SSSA Special Publ. 45. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA
Bouzaher A, Schogren JF, Holtkamp D, Gassman P, Archer D, Lakshminarayan P, Carriquiry A, Reese R, Furtan WH, Izaurralde C & Kiniry J (1994) Agricultural Policies and Soil Degradation in Western Canada: An Agro-Ecological Economic Assessment. Rpt. 3: The Integration of the Environmental and Economic Components. Tech Rpt.1/94. Policy Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
Dumanski J (1994) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sustainable Land Management for the 21st Century. Volume 1: Workshop Summary. The Organising Committee. International Workshop on Sustainable Land Management. Agricultural Institute of Canada, Ottawa
Dumanski J, Pettapiece WW, Acton DF & Claude PP (1993) Application of agro-ecological concepts and hierarchy theory in the design of databases for spatial and temporal characterisation of land and soil. Geoderma 60: 343–358
ESWG (Ecological Stratification Working Group) (1995) A national ecological framework for Canada. Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research. Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa
Fresco LO (1995) Agro-Ecological knowledge at different scales. In: Bouma J, Kuyvenhoven A, Bouman BAM, Luyten JC & Zandstra HG (eds.). Eco-Regional Approaches for Sustainable Land Use and Food Production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Goodland R (1991) The case that the world has reached limits. In: Goodland R, Daly H and El Serafy S (Eds.). Environmentally Sustainable Economic Development. Building on Brunt-land. Environment Working paper No. 46. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant E & Woodward R (1995) Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
Izac A-MN & Swift MJ (1994) On agricultural sustainability and its measurement in small-scale farming in sub-saharan Africa. Ecological Economics 11: 105–125
IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) (1995) Modeling land use and land cover. Options (Fall and Winter). IIASA, Vienna, Austria
Janssen WG (1995) Aggregating economic knowledge for use at national, regional, sector and farm level. In: Bouma J, Kuyvenhoven A, Bouman BAM, Luyten JC & Zandstra HG (Eds.). Eco-Regional Approaches for Sustainable Land Use and Food Production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Jones PG (1995) Response to section D. In: Bouma J, Kuyvenhoven A, Bouman BAM, Luyten JC & Zandstra HG (Eds.). Eco-Regional Approaches for Sustainable Land Use and Food Production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
King AW (1993) Consideration of scale and hierarchy. In: Woodley S, Kay J & Francis G (Eds.). Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL
McCalla AF (1994) Agriculture and food needs to 2025: Why we should be concerned. Sir John Crawford Memorial Lecture, CGIAR, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Pieri C, Dumanski J,Hamblin AS & Young A (1995) Land quality indicators. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 315. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Serageldin I (1995). Sustainability and the wealth of nations: First steps in an ongoing journey. Third Annual World Bank Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Development. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Smyth AJ & Dumanski J (1993) FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management. World Soil Resources Report No. 73. FAO, Rome
SSSA (Soil Science Society of America) (1995) SSSA statement on soil quality. Agronomy News. June, 1995: 7. SSSA, 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA
Turner II BL, Skole D, Sanderson S, Fischer G, Fresco L & Leemans R (1995) Land—use and land—cover change. Science/Research Plan. IGBP Rpt. No. 35. HDP Rpt. No. 7. IGBP Secretariat, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, S-10405 Stockholm, Sweden
van Latesteijn HC (1995) Scenarios for land use in Europe: Agro-ecological options within socio-economic boundaries. In: Bouma J, Kuyvenhoven A, Bouman BAM, Luyten JC & Zandstra HG (Eds.). Eco-Regional Approaches for Sustainable Land Use and Food Production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
World Bank (1995) Monitoring environmental progress. A report of work in progress. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dumanski, J., Pettapiece, W.W., McGregor, R.J. (1998). Relevance of scale dependent approaches for integrating biophysical and socio-economic information and development of agroecological indicators. In: Finke, P.A., Bouma, J., Hoosbeek, M.R. (eds) Soil and Water Quality at Different Scales. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3021-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3021-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5012-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3021-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive