Advertisement

Is the difference in population dynamics of Daphnia galeata in littoral and pelagic areas of a long-term biomanipulated reservoir affected by age-0 fish predation?

  • Stephan Hülsmann
  • Thomas Mehner
  • Susanne Worischka
  • Matthias Plewa
Chapter
  • 346 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 143)

Abstract

We analysed population dynamics of Daphnia galeata in littoral and pelagic areas of the long-term biomanipulated Bautzen reservoir during spring and early summer of two consecutive years. Simultaneously, consumption of the age-0 fish community was estimated by means of a bioenergetics model. As a consequence of biomanipulation, the abundance of adult planktivorous fish in Bautzen reservoir is low and the interactions between underyearling percids and Daphnia are a key process in the food web of this water. In both years, density and mean size of D. galeata were markedly lower in littoral than in pelagic areas, whereas no differences were found in the size at maturity and clutch size. However, the lower proportion of adults in the littoral zone resulted in drastically reduced birth rates, which could not explain the strong fluctuations in Daphnia abundance. These findings were consistent during the whole investigation period. Daphnia consumption by age-0 fish was markedly higher in the littoral than in the pelagic zone and accounted for up to 50% and even 100% of Daphnia mortality in this habitat. However, due to gape-size limitation, age-0 fish did not feed on daphnids before June. We conclude that besides underyearling percids older planktivorous fish contribute to the suppression of D. galeata in the littoral zone of Bautzen reservoir and that recruitment of daphnids in this habitat mainly takes place via (active or passive) immigration.

Key words

Daphnia galeata age-0 fish predation population dynamics horizontal distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benndorf, J., 1995. Possibilities and limits for controlling eutrophication by biomanipulation. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 80: 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benndorf, J., H. Schultz, A. Benndorf, R. Unger, E. Penz, H. Kneschke, K. Kossatz, R. Dumke, U. Hornig, R. Kruspe & S. Reichel, 1988. Food-web manipulation by enhancement of piscivorous fish stocks: long-term effects in the hypertrophie Bautzen reservoir. Limnologica 19: 97–110.Google Scholar
  3. Boikova, O. S., 1986. Horizontal distribution of crustaceans in Lake Glubokoe. Hydrobiologia 141: 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M. Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzig, A. Hillbricht-Ilkowska, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T. Weglenska, 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton studies. Norw. J. Zool. 24: 419–456.Google Scholar
  5. Černý, M. & J. Bytel, 1991. Density and size distribution of Daphnia populations at different fish predation levels. Hydrobiologia 225: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, J., 1985. Evidence for diurnal horizontal migration in Daphnia hyalina lacustris Sars. Hydrobiologia 120: 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dörner, H., A. Wagner & J. Benndorf. Predation by piscivorous fish on age-0 fish: spatial and temporal variability in a bio-manipulated lake (Bautzen reservoir, Germany). Hydrobiologia 408/409: 39–46.Google Scholar
  8. George, D. G. & R. W. Edwards, 1976. The effect of wind on the distribution of chlorophyll A and crustacean plankton in a shallow eutrophic reservoir. J. appl. Ecol. 4: 445–465.Google Scholar
  9. Gliwicz, Z. M. & J. Pijanowska, 1989. The role of predation in zooplankton succession. In Sommer, U. (ed.), Plankton Ecology; Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: 253–295.Google Scholar
  10. Gliwicz, Z. M. & A. Rykowska, 1992. `Shore avoidance’ in zooplankton: a predator-induced behaviour or predator-induced mortality? J. Plankton Res. 14: 1331–1342.Google Scholar
  11. Gliwicz, Z. M., A. Ghilarov & J. Pijanowska, 1981. Food and predation as major factors limiting two natural populations of Daphnia cucullata Sars. Hydrobiologia 80: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haney, J. F. & D. J. Hall, 1973. Sugar-coated Daphnia: a preserva- tion technique for Cladocera. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18: 331–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson, P. C., T. B. Johnson, D. E. Schindler & J. F. Kitchell, 1997. Fish bioenergetics 3.0. University of Wisconsin, Sea Grant Institute, report WISCU-T-97–001.Google Scholar
  14. Hülsmann, S. & T. Mehner, 1997. Predation impact of underyearling perch (Perca fluviatilis) on a Daphnia galeata population in a short-term enclosure experiment. Freshwat. Biol. 38: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jakobsen, P. J. & G. H. Johnsen, 1987. The influence of predation on horizontal distribution of zooplankton species. Freshwat. Biol. 17: 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauridsen, T. & D. M. Lodge, 1996. Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 794–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynch, M., 1980. The evolution of cladoceran life histories. Q. Rev. Biol. 55: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Machâcek, J. & J. Matena, 1997. Diurnal feeding patterns of age-0 perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) in a steep-sided reservoir. Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Adv. Limnol. 49: 59–70.Google Scholar
  19. Malone, B. J. & D. J. McQueen, 1983. Horizontal patchiness in zooplankton populations in two Ontario kettle lakes. Hydrobiologia 99: 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehner, T., H. Schultz, M.-G. Werner, F. Wieland, R. Herbst & J. Benndorf, 1996. Do 0+ percids couple the trophic cascade between fish and zooplankton in the top-down manipulated Bautzen reservoir (Germany)? Publ. Espec. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr. 21: 243–251.Google Scholar
  21. Mehner, T., M. Plewa, S. Hülsmann, H. Voigt & J. Benndorf, 1997. Age-0 fish predation on daphnids - spatial and temporal variability in the top-down manipulated Bautzen reservoir. Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Adv. Limnol. 49: 13–25.Google Scholar
  22. Mehner, T., M. Plewa, S. Hülsmann & S. Worischka, 1998a. Gape-size dependent feeding of age-0 perch (Perca fluviatilis) and age-0 zander (Stizostedion lucioperca) on Daphnia galeata. Arch. Hydrobiol. 142: 191–207.Google Scholar
  23. Mehner, T., S. Hülsmann, S. Worischka, M. Plewa & J. Benndorf, 1998b. Is the midsummer decline of Daphnia really induced by age-0 fish predation? Comparison of fish consumption and Daphnia mortality and life history parameters in a biomanipulated reservoir. J. Plankton Res. 20: 1797–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paloheimo, J. E., 1974. Calculation of instantaneous birth rate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 692–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patalas, K., 1969. Composition and horizontal distribution of crustacean plankton in Lake Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 2135–2164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pijanowska, J. & A. Kowalczewski, 1997. Predators can induce swarming behaviour and locomotory responses in Daphnia. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Polishchuk, L. V., 1994. Cladoceran birth rate dynamics: does population characteristic of analysis reflect environmental control? Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 25: 2369–2371.Google Scholar
  28. Pont, D. & J. Amrani, 1990. The effect of selective fish predation on the horizontal distribution of pelagic cladocera in a southern French reservoir. Hydrobiologia 207: 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siebeck, O., 1968. ‘Uferflucht’ and optische Orientierung pelagischer Crustaceen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 35: 1–118.Google Scholar
  30. Stibor, H., 1992. Predator induced life-history shifts in a freshwater cladoceran. Oecologia 92: 162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stibor, H. & W. Lampert, 1993. Estimating the size at maturity in field populations of Daphnia (Cladocera). Freshwat. Biol. 30: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stich, H.-B. & W. Lampert, 1984. Growth and reproduction of migrating and non-migrating Daphnia species under simulated food and temperature conditions of diurnal vertical migration. Oecologia 61: 192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Urabe, J., 1990. Stable horizontal variation in the zooplankton community structure of a reservoir maintained by predation and competition. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 1703–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Visman, V., D. J. McQueen & E. Demers, 1994. Zooplankton spatial patterns in two lakes with contrasting fish community structure. Hydrobiologia 284: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, L. & D. A. Culver, 1994. Daphnia population dynamics in Western Lake Erie: regulation by food limitation and yellow perch predation. J. Great Lakes Res. 20: 537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Hülsmann
    • 1
  • Thomas Mehner
    • 1
  • Susanne Worischka
    • 1
  • Matthias Plewa
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of HydrobiologyDresden University of TechnologyDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations