Advertisement

Neural network models as a management tool in lakes

  • Cüneyt Karul
  • Selçuk Soyupak
  • Coṣkun Yurteri
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 143)

Abstract

A research was made on the potential use of neural network based models in eutrophication modelling. As a result, an algorithm was developed to handle the practical aspects of designing, implementing and assessing the results of a neural network based model as a lake management tool. To illustrate the advantages and limitations of the neural network model, a case study was carried out to estimate the chlorophyll-a concentration in Keban Dam Reservoir as a function of sampled water quality parameters (PO4 phosphorus, NO3 nitrogen, alkalinity, suspended solids concentration, pH, water temperature, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen concentration and Secchi depth) by a neural network based model. Alternatively, the same system was solved with a linear multiple regression model in order to compare the performances of the proposed neural network based model and the traditional linear multiple regression model. For both of the models, the linear correlation coefficients between the logarithms of observed and calculated chlorophyll-a concentrations were calculated. The correlation coefficient R, the best linear fit between the observed and calculated values, was evaluated to assess the performances of the two models. R values of 0.74 and 0.71 were obtained for the neural network based model and the linear multiple regression model, respectively. The study showed that the neural network based model can be used to estimate chlorophyll-a with a performance similar to that of the traditional linear multiple regression method. However, for cases where the input and the output variables are not linearly correlated, neural network based models are expected to show a better performance.

Key words

eutrophication ecological modeling multiple regression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Demuth, H. & M. Beale, 1998. Neural Network Toolbox User’s Guide. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Hagan, M. T. & M. Menhaj, 1994. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5: 989–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Karul, C., S. Soyupak & E. Germen, 1998. A new approach to mathematical water quality modelling in reservoirs: Neural networks. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 83: 689–696Google Scholar
  4. Keiner, L. E. & C. W. Brown, 1998. A Neural Network as a non-linear chlorophyll estimation algorithm. http://orbitl9i.nesdis.noaa.gov/~lkeiner/seanam_neural/seabam2.htmGoogle Scholar
  5. Recknagel, F., M. French, P. Harkonen & K. Yabunaka, 1997. Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms. Ecol. Model. 96: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryding, S. & W. Rast, 1989. The control of eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs. Parthenon Publishing. Co., UNESCO.Google Scholar
  7. Scardi, M., 1996. Artificial neural networks as empirical models for estimating phytoplankton production. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 139: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Simpson, P. K., 1990. Artificial Neural Systems: Foundations, Paradigms, Applications and Implementations. Pergamon Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  9. Yabunaka, K., M. Hosomi & A. Murakami, 1997. Novel application of a back-propagation artificial neural network model formulated to predict algal bloom. Wat. Sci. Tech. 36: 89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cüneyt Karul
    • 1
  • Selçuk Soyupak
    • 1
  • Coṣkun Yurteri
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Environmental EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations