Skip to main content

On a Fundamental Paradigm Shift in the Natural Sciences

  • Chapter
Selforganization

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 14))

  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

There are in principle two ways of elucidating the conditions under which a branch of science is pursued. One way is to examine the structures to which this science has given rise; by »structures« I mean the products of scientific discovery which find their expression in hypotheses, models and theories about our world. The other way is to analyze the scientific process itself, the process represented in the activity of an individual scientist, in that of a group of scientists, and ultimately in the overall development of the branch of science in question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. This paper was read in Bielefeld on May 31st, 1988, as a lecture in the series »Philosophy of Science«.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The term »static« refers here to the picture of Nature behind traditional physics. Quite obviously, a single movement, for example as described in classical mechanics, cannot be called static. However, the basic laws of mechanics are symmetric with respect to time, so that the historicity of Nature is not subsumed under the concepts of traditional physics.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Particularly revealing in this connection is F.W.J. Schelling, »Von der Weltseele, eine Hypothese der höheren Physik zur Erklärung des allgemeinen Organismus«, in K.FA. Schelling (ed.), Fr.WJ. v. Schellings sämmtliche Werke, I. Abt., Bd. 2, Stuttgart: Cotta, 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For the effect of the German natural philosophy upon the development of the natural sciences, see D. von Engelhardt, »Prinzipien und Ziele der Naturphilosophie Schellings - Situation um 1800 und spätere Wirkungsgeschichte«, in L. Hasler (ed.), Schelling. Seine Bedeutung für eine Philosophie der Natur, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Fromman Holzboog, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.W.J. von Schelling, »Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur als Einleitung in das Studium dieser Wissenschaft«, in K.FA. Schelling (ed.), Fr.W.J. v. Schellings sämmtliche Werke, I. Abt. Bd. 2, Stuttgart: Cotta, 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Compare B.-0. Köppers (ed.), Leben = Physik + Chemie? Das Lebendige aus der Sicht bedeutender Physiker, Munich: Piper, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Polanyi, »Life’s Irreducible Structure«, Science 160 (1968), 1308–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A sequence consisting of n nucleotides, where there are B classes of nucleotide, possesses B° combinatorially possible sequences. For the sequence of a bacterial genome: B = 4 and n = 4 x 106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. It is worth noting that this definition would fit exactly for the so-called chaotic systems that are currently the object of intensive research effort in physics, and which we may regard as complex systems par excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhn, op. cit. 1970, note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.G. Hempel, P. Oppenheim, »Studies in the Logic of Explanation«, Philosophy of Science 15, (1948), 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.F. von Weizsäcker, Die Einheit der Natur, Munich: Hansen, 1971 English translation The Unity of Nature, New York: Farrar, Straus and Girous, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Compare E. Scheibe, »Gibt es eine Annäherung der Naturwissenschaften an die Geisteswissenschaften?«, Universitas 42 (1987), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. These considerations, which are highly speculative and have not yet been made available in published form, were initiated by H.-J. Queisser. Further details will be found in M. Eigen, »The Physics of Molecular Evolution«, Chemica Scripta 26B (1986), 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Windelband, Präludien,Tübingen: Mohr, ’1924.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Rickert, Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft,Tübingen: Mohr, 21910.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weizsäcker, op. cit. 1971, note 12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weizsäcker, op. cit. 1971, note 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Küppers, BO. (1990). On a Fundamental Paradigm Shift in the Natural Sciences. In: Krohn, W., Küppers, G., Nowotny, H. (eds) Selforganization. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2975-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2975-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4073-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2975-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics