Skip to main content

Radioactive Fallout and Emerging Environmentalism: Cold war Fears and Public Health Concerns, 1954–1963

  • Chapter
Science, History and Social Activism

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 228))

Abstract

This essay considers the scientific, social, and political contexts of the debate over radioactive fallout. I contend that the growth of an environmental consensus in 1950s America was constrained both by the nature of the fallout debate and by the cultural climate in which it took place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Illustration in Linda Lear, Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature (New York: Henry Holt, 1997), after p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rachel Carson, Silent Spring ( New York, Fawcett Crest, 1962 ), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ralph Lutts, “Chemical Fallout: Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, Radioactive Fallout, and the Environmental Movement”, Environmental Review,9 (1985), p. 212; Samuel P. Hays, Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 28; Spencer R. Weart, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988), p. 325; Lear, Rachel Carson,pp. 373–375 (cit. n. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hays, Beauty, Health, and Permanence,pp. 24, 28 (cit. n. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lear, Rachel Carson, pp. 397–427 (cit. n. 1). For an interesting analysis of Carson’s use of anti- Communist rhetoric in her critique of the pesticide industry, see Jeff Ellis, “Redefining the `Menace of Our Time’: Rachel Carson and Barry Commoner as Environmental Patriots in Cold War America”, paper presented at the Organization of American Historians annual meeting, San Francisco, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elof Axel Carlson, Genes, Radiation, and Society: The Life and Work of H.J. Muller (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981). For a biography of Linus Pauling, see Thomas Hager, Force of Nature: The Life of Linus Pauling ( New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. The NAS report was published in Science,123 (29 June 1956), pp. 1157–1164. The strontium-90 reports were published by J. Lawrence Kulp et al. in Science,125 (8 February (1957) pp. 219–225; Science,127 (7 February 1958), pp. 266–273; Science,129 (8 May 1959), pp. 1249–1255; and Science,132 (19 August 1960), pp. 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Linus Pauling, No More War! (New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1958); Edward Teller and Albert L. Latter, Our Nuclear Future: Facts, Dangers, and Opportunities (New York: Criterion Books, 1958). The transcript of the televised debate was published in Daedalus,87 (December, 1958), pp. 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lester Machta and Robert J. List, “The Global Pattern of Fallout”, in Fallout: A Study of Superbombs, Strontium-90, and Survival, John M. Fowler, ed. ( New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1960 ), pp. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ralph E. Lapp, “Fallout Hearings: Second Round”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 15 (1959), p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Machta and List, “The Global Pattern of Fallout”, pp. 27–29 (cit. n. 9).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Carolyn Kopp, “The Origins of the American Scientific Debate over Fallout Hazards”, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979), pp. 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Genetic Effects of Radiation“, Science,123 (29 June 1956), p. 1164.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pauling, No More War!,p. 73 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pauling, No More War!,p. 67 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teller and Latter, Our Nuclear Future,pp. 130–133 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Teller and Latter, Our Nuclear Future,p. 133 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Problems Presented by Radioactive Fallout“, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,15 (June 1959), p 258.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Lawrence Kulp et al.,“Strontium-90 in Man”, Science,125 (1957), p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W.O. Caster, “From Bomb to Man” in John M. Fowler (ed.), Fallout,p. 44 (cit. n. 9).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kulp, “Strontium-90 in Man”, pp. 221–222 (cit. n. 19).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walter R. Eckelmann et al.,“Strontium-90 in Man, II”, Science,127(7) (1958), p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lapp, “Fallout Hearings: Second Round”, p. 305 (cit. n. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teller and Latter, Our Nuclear Future,p. 124 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teller and Latter, Our Nuclear Future,p. 124 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pauling, No More War!,p. 105 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pauling, No More War!,p. 102 (cit. n. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Atom Fallout… How Bad It Is… What We Can Do About It Now“, Newsweek,53 (6 April 1959), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robert A. Divine, Blowing on the Wind: The Nuclear Test Ban Debate, 1954–1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), pp. 1–13; Allan M. Winkler, Life Under a Cloud: American Anxiety About the Atom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 93–94. See also the film, Atomic Café (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  30. David O. Woodbury, “Basic Facts About `Fallout”’, Reader’s Digest,73 (September, 1958), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Woodbury, “Basic Facts About `Fallout”’, p. 55 (cit. n. 30).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Steven M. Spencer, “Fallout; The Silent Killer”, Saturday Evening Post,232 (29 August 1959), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spencer, “Fallout”, 89 (cit. n. 32).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Steven M Spencer, “Fallout: The Silent Killer, How Soon is Too Late?”, Saturday Evening Post,232 (5 September 1959), p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ruth and Edward Brecher, “What We Are Not Being Told About Fallout Hazards”, Redbook, 119 (September 1962), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brecher, “What We Are Not Being Told”, p. 106 (cit. n. 35).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Earl Ubell, “Will Radiation Harm Your Child?”, Parents’ Magazine, 35 (July, 1960 ), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ubell, “Will Radiation Harm Your Child?”, p. 105 (cit. n. 37).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ubell, “Will Radiation Harm Your Child?”, p. 105 (cit. n. 37).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Radiation: 110 Babies“, Newsweek,59 (11 June 1962), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  41. All About A-Bombs, Fall-Out, Dangers in the Future“, U.S. News and World Report, 38 (29 April 1955 ), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  42. What’s Back of the `Fall-Out Scare-, U.S. News and World Report,42 (7 June, 1957), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. What Will Radioactivity Do to our Children?“, U.S. News and World Report,38 (13 May 1955), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  44. What Will Radioactivity Do to our Children?“, p. 72 (cit. n. 43).

    Google Scholar 

  45. What Fallout Really Means to You and your Children“, US. News and World Report,51 (13 November 1961), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Warning“, Newsweek,44 (5 July, 1954), p. 73, and ”Can We Win a War with Russia? Yes, But-“, Newsweek,44 (5 July, 1954), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  47. The Atom: The Peril of Strontium-90“, Time,69 (6 May,1957), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  48. The Atom“, Time,78 (10 November, 1961), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Radiation Hazards from Fallout and X rays“, Consumer Reports,23 (September, 1958), p. 484. s° Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  50. The Milk All of Us Drink and Fallout“, Consumer Reports,24 (March 1959), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R.H. Wasserman, “Contamination of Food by Fallout”, New York State Journal of Medicine, 60 (1 December, 1960), pp. 3857–3862; S. Garb, “Survival in a Thermonuclear War” New York State Journal of Medicine, 60 (1 December 1960), pp. 3863–3866. See also Paul Boyer, “Physicians Confront the Apocalypse: The American Medical Profession and the Threat of Nuclear War”, Journal of the American Medical Association, 253 (1985), pp. 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Deborah Levine, “Typhoid Fever and Public Health in Pittsburgh”, unpublished manuscript, Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Joel Tarr, “Changing Fuel Use Behavior and Energy Transitions: The Pittsburgh Smoke Control Movement, 1940–1950” Journal of Social History 14 (1981), pp. 561–588; Joel Tarr, “Railroad Smoke Control: The Regulation of a Mobile Pollution Source”, in Energy and Transport: Historical Perspectives on Policy Issues, George H. Daniels and Mark H. Rose, eds. ( London: Sage Publications, 1982 ), pp. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Divine, Blowing on the Wind,pp. 267–268; Winkler, Life Under a Cloud,pp. 105–106 (both cit. n. 9).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Divine, Blowing on the Wind (cit. n. 9), p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Divine, Blowing on the Wind (cit. n. 9), p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See Amy Swerdlow, Women Strike for Peace: Traditional Motherhood and Radical Politics in the 1960s ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993 )

    Google Scholar 

  58. Information (24 December, 1958). Initially titled Information, the name of the bulletin was changed to Nuclear Information in March 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Information(24 December, 1958), (cit. n. 59).

    Google Scholar 

  60. William O. Pruitt, “High Radiation in Eskimos”, Audubon Magazine,65 (1963), pp. 284, 286.

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. Hawthorn and R.B. Duckworth, “Fallout Radioactivity in a Deer’s Antlers”, Nature, 182 (1958), p. 1294; F.R. Fosberg, “Plants and Fallout”, Nature, 183 (1959), p. 1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Quoted in Paul Brooks, The House of Life:: Rachel Carson at Work ( Boston: G.K. Hall & Co., 1972 ), pp. 243–244.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hays, Beauty, Health, and Permanence (cit. n. 3), pp. 22–29.65 Eugene J. Rosi, “Mass and Attentive Opinion on Nuclear Weapons Tests and Fallout, 19541963”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (1965), pp. 280–297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watkins, E.S. (2001). Radioactive Fallout and Emerging Environmentalism: Cold war Fears and Public Health Concerns, 1954–1963. In: Allen, G.E., MacLeod, R.M. (eds) Science, History and Social Activism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 228. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2956-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2956-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2956-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics