Skip to main content

Is Modern Science an Ethno-Science? Rethinking Epistemological Assumptions

  • Chapter
Science and Technology in a Developing World

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 19))

Abstract

A central focus of recent work in the social and cultural studies of science and technology (SCSST for short) has been to show how modern sciences have been constituted by their practices and cultures, not just externally enabled by them in ways that leave no marks on their cognitive cores.1 They are local knowledge systems or, in other words, “ethno-sciences.” Most of these authors have insisted on abandoning claims to universality, objectivity and rationality for modern sciences since such claims are themselves only socially established. To put the point another way, since the perception of scientific claims as universal, objective and rational is itself locally constructed and not an internal, trans-cultural feature of any truly scientific processes, any appeal to such notions should carry no more authority than the claims can command on other grounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adas, Michael (1989), Machines as the Measure of Man. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvares, Claude (1990), `Science, Colonialism and Violence: A Luddite View’, in A. Nandy, ed., Science, Hegemony and Violence. Delhi: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir (1989), Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, J. and V. Shiva (1988), ‘Science and Control: Natural Resources and their Exploitation,’ in Z. Sardar, ed. The Revenge of Athena. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Thomas (1990), Camping With the Prince, and Other Tales of Science in Africa. Boston: Houghton Muffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Moms (1981), The Reenchantment of the World. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Blaut, J.M. (1993), The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David (1977), Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Brockway, Lucille H. (1979), Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanical Gardens. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press. Crosby. Alfred (1987), Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion ofEumpe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, Pascal (1994), ‘Scientific Language and National Identity: Egypt from the 19th Century’. Presentation September 20, 1994 at ‘Twentieth Century Science: Beyond the Metropolis’ Conference, Paris, co-sponsored by UNESCO and ORSTOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, John (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations for the Disunity of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne ( 1992, 1985), Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul (1975), Against Method. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, Paul (1987), ‘Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Bases for Physical

    Google Scholar 

  • Research in the U.S., 1940–1960, Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Sciences 18. Frake, C. (1962), ‘The Ethnographic Study of Cognitive Systems’, in T. Gladwin, ed. Anthropology and Human Behaviour. Washington D.C.: The Anthropology Society of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (1992), ‘Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies’, in Scienceas Practice and Culture, ed. Andrew Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Goonatilake, Susantha (1984), Aborted Discovery: Science and Creativity in the Third World.London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (1988), ‘A Project for Our Times’, in Z. Sardar, ed., The Revenge of Athena. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (1992), ‘The Voyages of Discovery and the Loss and Rediscovery of the ‘Others’ Knowledge’, Impact of Science on Society, No. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, ian (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Haraway, Donna (1989), Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Naturein the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, ian (Forthcoming), ‘Universal Donors in a Vampire Culture: 20th Century Biological Kinship Categories.’

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra ed. (1983), Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1986), The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. — (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1992), ‘After the Neutrality ideal: Science, Politics and ‘Strong Objectivity’ ’, Social Research 59: 567–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (ed.) (1993), The ‘Racial’ Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1994), `Is Science Multicultural? Challenges, Resources, Opportunities, Uncertainties’, in Configurations 2:2, and in Multiculturalism: A Reader ed. David Theo Goldberg. London: Blackwell’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (forthcoming), “Strong Objectivity’: A Response to the New Objectivity Question’, Synthese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra and Jean O’Barr (1987), Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hayles, N. Katherine (1992), `Gender Encoding in Fluid Mechanics: Masculine Channels and Feminine Flows’, in Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(2), I 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, David J. (1995), Science and Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts and Artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Mary (1996), Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessen, Boris (1970) The Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia. New York: Howard Fertig. Joseph, George Gheverghese (1991) The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics. New York: I.B. Tauris Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptchuk, Ted J. (1983), The Weh That Has No Weaver: Understanding Chinese Medicine. New York: Congdon and Weed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox (1984), Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press. — (1992), Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khor, Kok Peng (1988), `Science and Development: Underdeveloping the Third World’, in Z. Sardar, ed. The Revenge of Athena. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar, R.K. (1992–93), `Science in British India’ Parts I and II, Current Science. Vol. 63, No. 11, Vol. 64, No. 1 (India).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Deepak (1991), Science and Empire: Essays in Indian Context (1700–1947). Delhi, India:

    Google Scholar 

  • Anamika Prakashan, and National Institute of Science, Technology and Development. Lakatos, Imre and Alan Musgrave (1970), Criticism and the Gmwth of Knowledge. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Latour, Bruno (1987), Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anamika Prakashan (1988), The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anamika Prakashan and Steve Woolgar (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction ofScientific Facts. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.P. (1977), `Chinese Herbal Medicine: Recent Experimental Studies, Clinical Applications and Pharmacognosy of Certain Herbs’, in Revolutionary Health Committee of Hunan Province, A Barefoot Doctor’s Manual, Revised Edition. Seattle: Madrona Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, James E. (1992), Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, Maria (1986), Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labor. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraze, Charles (ed.) (1979), Science and the Factors of Inequality. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, Ashis (ed.) (1990) Science Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity. Delhi: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph (1969) The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitjean, Patrick, et al (1992) Science and Empires: Historical Studies About Scientific Development and Eumpean Expansion. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew (1984), Constructing Quarks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew ed. (1992), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Polanco, Xavier (1992), ‘World-Science: How is the History of World-Science to Be Written?’, in P. Petitjean et al, eds. Science and Empires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, Robert (1995), Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don’t Know About Cancer. Boston: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1953), ‘Two Dogmas and Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodney, Walter (1982) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Washington D.C.: Howard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, Phyllis (1994), ‘Recent Work in Feminist Discussions of Reason’ American Philosophical Quarterly 31(1) I-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph (1987), Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph (1993), ‘What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge?’ Configurations 1(1), I - 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph (forthcoming), ‘Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge’, in Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science,ed. Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson.Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph (forthcoming), Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Wolfgang, ed. (1992) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Atlantic Highlands, New Yersey: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Ziauddin (ed.) (1988) The Revenge of Athena: Science Exploitation and the Third World. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, John A. and Richard R. Yeo (1986) The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven (1994), A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shiva, Vandana (1989), Staving Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy E. (1990). The Conceptual Practices of Power.: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge.Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn-Rethel, Alfred (1978), Intellectual and Manual Labor. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Third World Network (1988), Modern Science in Crisis: A Third World Response. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, Tzvetan (1984), The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other, tr. Richard Howard. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, Sharon (1988), Beamtimes and Life Times. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumbull, David (1993), ‘Local Knowledge and Comparative Scientific Traditions’ Knowledge and Policy 6: 3/4, 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, Bas and Jill Sigman (1993), ‘Interpretation in Science and in the Arts’, in George Levine, ed. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch and J. Petersen. Thousand Oaks, Cal: Sage Publicaqtions, p. 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Patrick and Laura Chrisman, eds. (1994), Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilsel, Edgar (1942), ‘The Sociological Roots of Science.’ American Journal of Sociology 47, 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Terry Shinn Jack Spaapen Venni Krishna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harding, S. (1997). Is Modern Science an Ethno-Science? Rethinking Epistemological Assumptions. In: Shinn, T., Spaapen, J., Krishna, V. (eds) Science and Technology in a Developing World. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2948-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2948-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4799-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2948-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics