Abstract
A central focus of recent work in the social and cultural studies of science and technology (SCSST for short) has been to show how modern sciences have been constituted by their practices and cultures, not just externally enabled by them in ways that leave no marks on their cognitive cores.1 They are local knowledge systems or, in other words, “ethno-sciences.” Most of these authors have insisted on abandoning claims to universality, objectivity and rationality for modern sciences since such claims are themselves only socially established. To put the point another way, since the perception of scientific claims as universal, objective and rational is itself locally constructed and not an internal, trans-cultural feature of any truly scientific processes, any appeal to such notions should carry no more authority than the claims can command on other grounds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adas, Michael (1989), Machines as the Measure of Man. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Alvares, Claude (1990), `Science, Colonialism and Violence: A Luddite View’, in A. Nandy, ed., Science, Hegemony and Violence. Delhi: Oxford.
Amin, Samir (1989), Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review.
Bandyopadhyay, J. and V. Shiva (1988), ‘Science and Control: Natural Resources and their Exploitation,’ in Z. Sardar, ed. The Revenge of Athena. London: Mansell.
Bass, Thomas (1990), Camping With the Prince, and Other Tales of Science in Africa. Boston: Houghton Muffin.
Berman, Moms (1981), The Reenchantment of the World. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Blaut, J.M. (1993), The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: The Guildford Press.
Bloor, David (1977), Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Brockway, Lucille H. (1979), Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanical Gardens. New York: Academic Press.
Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press. Crosby. Alfred (1987), Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion ofEumpe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crozet, Pascal (1994), ‘Scientific Language and National Identity: Egypt from the 19th Century’. Presentation September 20, 1994 at ‘Twentieth Century Science: Beyond the Metropolis’ Conference, Paris, co-sponsored by UNESCO and ORSTOM.
Dupre, John (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations for the Disunity of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fausto-Sterling, Anne ( 1992, 1985), Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.
Feyerabend, Paul (1975), Against Method. London: New Left Books.
Forman, Paul (1987), ‘Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Bases for Physical
Research in the U.S., 1940–1960, Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Sciences 18. Frake, C. (1962), ‘The Ethnographic Study of Cognitive Systems’, in T. Gladwin, ed. Anthropology and Human Behaviour. Washington D.C.: The Anthropology Society of Washington.
Fuller, Steve (1992), ‘Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies’, in Scienceas Practice and Culture, ed. Andrew Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Goonatilake, Susantha (1984), Aborted Discovery: Science and Creativity in the Third World.London: Zed.
Fuller, Steve (1988), ‘A Project for Our Times’, in Z. Sardar, ed., The Revenge of Athena. London: Mansell.
Fuller, Steve (1992), ‘The Voyages of Discovery and the Loss and Rediscovery of the ‘Others’ Knowledge’, Impact of Science on Society, No. 167.
Hacking, ian (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Haraway, Donna (1989), Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Naturein the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
Hacking, ian (Forthcoming), ‘Universal Donors in a Vampire Culture: 20th Century Biological Kinship Categories.’
Harding, Sandra ed. (1983), Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Harding, Sandra (1986), The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. — (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Harding, Sandra (1992), ‘After the Neutrality ideal: Science, Politics and ‘Strong Objectivity’ ’, Social Research 59: 567–87.
Harding, Sandra (ed.) (1993), The ‘Racial’ Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Harding, Sandra (1994), `Is Science Multicultural? Challenges, Resources, Opportunities, Uncertainties’, in Configurations 2:2, and in Multiculturalism: A Reader ed. David Theo Goldberg. London: Blackwell’s.
Harding, Sandra (forthcoming), “Strong Objectivity’: A Response to the New Objectivity Question’, Synthese.
Harding, Sandra and Jean O’Barr (1987), Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hayles, N. Katherine (1992), `Gender Encoding in Fluid Mechanics: Masculine Channels and Feminine Flows’, in Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(2), I 7–44.
Hess, David J. (1995), Science and Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts and Artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hesse, Mary (1996), Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hessen, Boris (1970) The Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia. New York: Howard Fertig. Joseph, George Gheverghese (1991) The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics. New York: I.B. Tauris Co.
Kaptchuk, Ted J. (1983), The Weh That Has No Weaver: Understanding Chinese Medicine. New York: Congdon and Weed.
Keller, Evelyn Fox (1984), Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press. — (1992), Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science. New York: Routledge.
Khor, Kok Peng (1988), `Science and Development: Underdeveloping the Third World’, in Z. Sardar, ed. The Revenge of Athena. London: Mansell.
Kochhar, R.K. (1992–93), `Science in British India’ Parts I and II, Current Science. Vol. 63, No. 11, Vol. 64, No. 1 (India).
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kumar, Deepak (1991), Science and Empire: Essays in Indian Context (1700–1947). Delhi, India:
Anamika Prakashan, and National Institute of Science, Technology and Development. Lakatos, Imre and Alan Musgrave (1970), Criticism and the Gmwth of Knowledge. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Latour, Bruno (1987), Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Anamika Prakashan (1988), The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Anamika Prakashan and Steve Woolgar (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction ofScientific Facts. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.
Li, C.P. (1977), `Chinese Herbal Medicine: Recent Experimental Studies, Clinical Applications and Pharmacognosy of Certain Herbs’, in Revolutionary Health Committee of Hunan Province, A Barefoot Doctor’s Manual, Revised Edition. Seattle: Madrona Publishers.
McClellan, James E. (1992), Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper and Row.
Mies, Maria (1986), Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labor. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Zed Press.
Moraze, Charles (ed.) (1979), Science and the Factors of Inequality. Paris: UNESCO.
Nandy, Ashis (ed.) (1990) Science Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity. Delhi: Oxford.
Needham, Joseph (1969) The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Petitjean, Patrick, et al (1992) Science and Empires: Historical Studies About Scientific Development and Eumpean Expansion. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pickering, Andrew (1984), Constructing Quarks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, Andrew ed. (1992), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Polanco, Xavier (1992), ‘World-Science: How is the History of World-Science to Be Written?’, in P. Petitjean et al, eds. Science and Empires.
Proctor, Robert (1995), Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don’t Know About Cancer. Boston: Basic Books.
Quine, W.V.O. (1953), ‘Two Dogmas and Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Rodney, Walter (1982) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Washington D.C.: Howard University Press.
Rooney, Phyllis (1994), ‘Recent Work in Feminist Discussions of Reason’ American Philosophical Quarterly 31(1) I-21.
Rouse, Joseph (1987), Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Rouse, Joseph (1993), ‘What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge?’ Configurations 1(1), I - 22.
Rouse, Joseph (forthcoming), ‘Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge’, in Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science,ed. Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson.Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishing Co.
Rouse, Joseph (forthcoming), Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Sachs, Wolfgang, ed. (1992) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Atlantic Highlands, New Yersey: Zed Books.
Sardar, Ziauddin (ed.) (1988) The Revenge of Athena: Science Exploitation and the Third World. London: Mansell.
Schuster, John A. and Richard R. Yeo (1986) The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Shapin, Steven (1994), A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shiva, Vandana (1989), Staving Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed.
Smith, Dorothy E. (1990). The Conceptual Practices of Power.: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred (1978), Intellectual and Manual Labor. London: Macmillan.
Third World Network (1988), Modern Science in Crisis: A Third World Response. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
Todorov, Tzvetan (1984), The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other, tr. Richard Howard. New York: Harper Row.
Traweek, Sharon (1988), Beamtimes and Life Times. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tumbull, David (1993), ‘Local Knowledge and Comparative Scientific Traditions’ Knowledge and Policy 6: 3/4, 29–54.
Van Fraassen, Bas and Jill Sigman (1993), ‘Interpretation in Science and in the Arts’, in George Levine, ed. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch and J. Petersen. Thousand Oaks, Cal: Sage Publicaqtions, p. 115–139.
Williams, Patrick and Laura Chrisman, eds. (1994), Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zilsel, Edgar (1942), ‘The Sociological Roots of Science.’ American Journal of Sociology 47, 545–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harding, S. (1997). Is Modern Science an Ethno-Science? Rethinking Epistemological Assumptions. In: Shinn, T., Spaapen, J., Krishna, V. (eds) Science and Technology in a Developing World. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2948-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2948-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4799-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2948-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive