Summary
According to classical rationalism, prejudiced people cannot conduct proper research, and all error is prejudice. Known cases of prejudiced and even Nazi scientists refute the first thesis. The crucial experiment between Newton and Einstein refuted the second: Newton’s theory is not true, yet it is admirable all the same. Contemporary popular irrationalists declare crucial experiments impossible. They sound plausible because of the failure — due to cowardice — of the leadership of science to admit openly the need to replace the traditional theory of rationality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Joseph Agassi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (2003). Irrationalism Today. In: Science and Culture. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 231. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2946-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2946-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6234-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2946-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive