Skip to main content

The Dissoi Logoi and Early Greek Scepticism

  • Chapter
  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

Dissoi Logoi (“Contrasting Arguments”) is the name of a little-known anonymous document that is found appended to the works of Sextus Empiricus in the manuscripts containing his writings. It was first published in Paris in 1570,1 and since that date there has been dispute, among its handful of readers, concerning its date, authorship, purpose and overall philosophical commitments.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In H.StephanusDiog. Laert. Opera 1(Paris, 1570), pp. 470–482.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For the most recent edition of the work, see T. M. Robinson, Contrasting Arguments: An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi (New York: Arno Press, 1979), from which the various translations in this essay are taken.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See especially 1.8, “And in the matter of war (I shall speak first of the most recent events) the Spartan victory over the Athenians and their allies was good for the Spartans, but bad for the Athenians and their allies…”.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For the various views on authorship that have been put forward over the years see Robinson, Contrasting Arguments,pp. 41–54. A notable recent exception to the currently accepted view is that of Thomas M. Conley, “Dating the Dissoi Logoi: A Cautionary Note,” Ancient Philosophy 5.1 (1985): 59–65, which upholds the possibility of anonymous Byzantine authorship.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.Diels and W. Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (Berlin: Weidmann, 19516), ad loc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For details see Robinson, Contrasting Argumentspp. 55 ff

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., pp. 59 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.J.Levi, “On Twofold Statements,” American Journal of Philology61 (1940): 292–306

    Google Scholar 

  9. ff.= Protagoras A 1, B 6a DK6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aristophanes Clouds 882–884; Aristotle Rhet.1402a 23 = Protagoras B 6b DK6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For proponents of the view see Robinson Contrasting Argumentsp. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For discussion of the passage, see Rosamond Kent Sprague, Aristotle on Mutilation:Metaphysics 5.27,Syllecta Classica 2 (1990): 20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, T.M. (1996). The Dissoi Logoi and Early Greek Scepticism. In: Popkin, R.H. (eds) Scepticism in the History of Philosophy. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées, vol 145. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2942-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2942-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4629-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2942-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics