Skip to main content

A comparison of root characteristics in relation to nutrient and water stress in two maize hybrids

  • Chapter
Roots: The Dynamic Interface between Plants and the Earth

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 101))

Abstract

Root responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to limited nutrients and water availability were evaluated in two highly productive full-season hybrids, DK585 and Santos (Dekalb — Monsanto), in laboratory, pot and field tests. In the laboratory, under optimal nutrient and water supply, seedlings of DK585 had higher growth (leaves and roots). Under nitrate or sulphate deprivation, DK585 showed better ability in adapting its root/shoot ratio to stress conditions, whereas Santos showed less plastic behaviour. This morphological trait of DK585 was associated with higher sulphate and constitutive nitrate influxes. In pot trials (plants with four to five leaves), DK585 maintained a high transpiration level to very low values (around 0.2) of FTSW (fraction of transpirable soil water), whereas Santos showed a higher response to soil drying. The latter reduced the rate of transpiration starting from a FTSW of about 0.6. In the open field (trial in 2000, Legnaro, NE Italy), in conditions of fluctuating combined water and nitrogen stress, DK585 at flowering reached greater root length density (RLD) than Santos in deep layers (50–100-cm interval depth) of positions further from the plant. However, in these conditions, the yield of DK585 was found to be only slightly higher than that of Santos (8.88 vs. 8.49 t ha.−1 d.w.). An overall evaluation of the two hybrids indicates the more conservative strategy towards limited water and nutrient resources in Santos, and a greater tendency towards stress avoidance in DK585.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations

ABA:

abscisic acid

FTSW:

fraction of transpirable soil water

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

PPFD:

photosynthetic photon flux density

RLD:

root length density

RSR:

root/shoot ratio

RT:

relative transpiration

SRL:

specific root length

Φoc :

nutrient influx (from outside into cytoplasm)

References

  • Amon D I and Hogland D R 1940 Crop production in artificial culture solutions and in soils with special reference to factors influencing yields and absorption of inorganic nutrients. Soil Sci. 50, 463–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber S A 1976 Efficient fertilizer use. In Agronomic Research for Food. Special Publ. 26. pp. 13–29. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates L S, Waldren R P and Teere I D 1973 Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant Soil 39, 205–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnert H J and Bressan R A 2001 Abiotic stresses, plant reactions and new approaches towards understanding stress tolerance. In Crop Science: Progress and Prospects. Eds. J Noesberger, H H Geiger and P C Struik. pp. 81–100. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bona S, Mosca G, Cantele A and Vamerali T 2000 Response of sunflower to progressive water stress. In Proceedings of 15th International Sunflower Conference, Toulouse, France, 12–15 June 2000. pp. D58 — D63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bona S, Vamerali T and Mosca G 1995 Response of the root system of maize (Zea mays L.) to reduction of inputs. Riv. Agron. 29, 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R 1983 Functional equilibrium: sense or nonsense. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 31, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacco G, Ferrari G and Saccomani M 1980 Pattern of sulphate uptake during root elongation in maize: its correlation with productivity. Physiol. Plant. 48, 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F S 1988 Ecological aspects of plant mineral nutrition. In Advances in Plant Nutrition. Eds. B Tinker and A Läuchli. Vol. 3. pp. 161–191. Praeger, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J M and Townley-Smith T F 1984 Drying rates of spring triticale compared to wheat. Agron. J. 76, 454–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho E F and Or D 1999 Root distribution and water uptake patterns of corn under surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Plant Soil 206, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell E T and Godwin D C 1984 The efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to cereals in different climates. In Advances in Plant Nutrition. Eds. P B Tinker and A Läuchli. Vol. 1. pp. 1–56. Praeger Publisher, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Willigen P, Nielsen N E, Claassen N and Castrignanò A M 2000 Modelling water nutrient uptake. In Root Methods — A Handbook. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin and S C van de Geijn. pp. 511–543. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F B and Barnes B T 1971 A mechanical method for obtaining soil cores. Plant Soil 35, 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H, 1996 Characteristics and functions of root systems. In Plant Roots — The Hidden Half. Books in Soils, Plants, and the Environment. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp. 1–20. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusseder A, Krauss M and Beck E 1988 Reassessment of root competition for P of field grown maize in pure and mixed cropping. Plant Soil 106, 299–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutschick V P 1981 Evolved strategies in nitrogen acquisition by plants. Am. Nat. 118, 607–637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hole D J, Emran A M, Fares Y and Drew M C 1990 Induction of nitrate transport in maize roots and kinetics of influx, measured with nitrogen-13. Plant Physiol. 93, 642–647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B 1991 Root-shoot relationships. In Plant Roots — The Hidden Half. Books in Soils, Plants, and the Environment. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp. 265–286. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Fuchs M, Cohen S, Cohen Y and Wallach R 2002 Water uptake profile response of corn to soil moisture depletion. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow M M and Muchow R C 1990 A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv. Agron. 43, 107–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagoli M, Ferrari G and Saccomani M 1993 Assessment of selection pressure for improved nitrate and sulphate recovery by maize. J. Plant Nutr. 16, 713–722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd Edition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, 889 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Materechera S A, Alston A M, Kirby J M and Dexter A R 1992 Influence of root diameter on the penetration of seminal roots into compacted subsoil. Plant Soil 144, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H T, Babu R C and Blum A 1997 Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Sci. 37, 1426–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman R J, Edberg J C and Stucki W J 1985 Determination of nitrate extracts by dual-wavelength ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 1182–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober E S and Sharp R E 1994 Proline accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots at low water potentials. I. Requirement for increased levels of abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 105, 981–987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ober S E, Johnston D A, Clark C J A, Jaggard K W and Pidgeon J D 2000 Improving sugar beet tolerance. In 63rd IIRB Congress, Interlaken, Switzerland, 9–10 February 2000. pp. 335–340. International Institute for Beet Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira M do R G, van Noordwijk M, Gaze S R, Brouwer G, Bona S, Mosca G and Hairiah K 2000 Auger sampling, ingrowth cores and pinboard methods. In Root Methods — A Handbook. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin and S C van de Geijn. pp. 175–210. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B 1980 The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 333–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B 1982 Water in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. In Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology. Eds. O L Lange, P S Nobel, C B Osmond and H Ziegler. New series, Vol. 12B. pp. 5–33. Springer, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie C L and Hall A E 1992 Water relations in cowpea and pearl millet under soil water deficits. II. Water use and root distribution. Aust. J. Soil Res. 19, 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe E 1990 Stress physiology: the functional significance of the accumulation of nitrogen-containing compounds. J. Hortic. Sci. 65, 231–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J D and Sinclair T R 1997 Stomata closure of maize hybrids in response to drying soil. Crop Sci. 37, 803–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J D and Sinclair T R 1998 The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 1381–1386.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J D, Gesch R W, Sinclair T R and Allen L H 2002 The effect of vapor pressure deficit on maize transpiration response to a drying soil. Plant Soil 239, 113–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richner W, Liedgens M, Buergi H, Soldati A and Stamp P 2000 Root image analysis and interpretation. In Root Methods — A Handbook. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin and S C van de Geijn. pp. 305–341. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Serra] R and Sinclair TR 2002 Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plant Cell Environ. 25, 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shein E V and Pachepsky Y A 1995 Influence of root density on the critical soil water potential. Plant Soil 171, 351–357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart G R and Larher F 1980 Accumulation of amino acids and related compounds in relation to environmental stress. In The Biochemistry of Plants. Eds. P K Stumpf and E E Conn. Vol. 5. pp. 609–635. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckle C O and Nelson R L 1994 CropSyst User’s Manual (Version 1. 0 ). Biological Systems Engineering Dept., Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckle C O and Nelson R L 1996 CropSyst User’s Manual (Version 2. 0 ). Biological Systems Engineering Dept., Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiz L and Zeiger E 1998 Plant Physiology. 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, MA, USA. 792 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotel-Aziz P, Niogret M F, Larher F 2000 Proline level is partly under the control of abscisic acid in canola leaf discs during recovery from hyper-osmotic stress. Physiol. Plant. 110, 376–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsegaye T and Mullins C E 1994 Effects of mechanical impedance on root morphology of two varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.). New Phytol. 126, 707–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C 1997 Further progress in crop water relations. Adv. Agron. 58, 293–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C 2001 Optimizing water use. In Crop Science: Progress and Prospects. Eds. J Noesberger, H H Geiger and P C Struik. pp 119–136. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Ganis A, Bona S and Mosca G 1999 An approach to minirhizotron root image analysis. Plant Soil 217, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Guarise M, Ganis A, Bona S and Mosca G 2001 A fast procedure of root image analysis applied to auger sampling. In Proceedings of the 6th ISSR Symposium, Nagoya, Japan, 11–15 November 2001. pp. 580–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace A 1989 The interacting nature of limiting factors on crop production: implications for biotechnology. Soil Sci. 147, 469–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshiba Y, Kiyosye T, Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K and Shinozaki K 1997 Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 38, 1095–1102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Vamerali .

Editor information

Jun Abe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vamerali, T., Saccomani, M., Bona, S., Mosca, G., Guarise, M., Ganis, A. (2003). A comparison of root characteristics in relation to nutrient and water stress in two maize hybrids. In: Abe, J. (eds) Roots: The Dynamic Interface between Plants and the Earth. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 101. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2923-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2923-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6407-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2923-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics