Abstract
Risk and uncertainty are crucial features of agricultural production. The particular concern of agricultural economists with risk may be explained in part by the dependence of agricultural production on the natural environment, taken broadly to include climate as well as soil conditions, beneficial and harmful animal populations and so on. Conversely, the activities of agricultural producers have a substantial impact on the natural environment and this impact is subject to both risk and uncertainty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow. K. (1953), Le role des valeurs boursiers pour la, repartition la meillure des risques, Cahiers du Seminair d’Economie CNRS, Paris.
Chambers, R. G. and J. Quiggin (1996), ‘Nonpoint pollution control as a multitask principal-agent problem’, Journal of Public Economics 59(1): 95 116.
Chambers, R. G. and J. Quiggin (1997), ‘Separation and hedging results with state-contingent production’, Economica 64(254): 187 209.
Chambers, R. G. and J. Quiggin (1998), ‘Cost functions and duality for stochastic technologies’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(2): 288 95.
Chambers, R. G. and J. Quiggin (2000), Uncertainty, Production. Choice and Agency: The State-Contingent Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Chambers, R. G. and J. Quiggin (2001), ‘Production externalities and multitask principal-agent problems’, Working Paper, Australian National University. Canberra.
Debreu, G. (1952). ‘A social equilibrium existence theorem’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 38: 886 93.
Grossman. S. and O. Hart (1983), ‘An analysis of principal-agent problems’, Econometrica 51: 7–46.
Luenberger, D. G. (1992), ‘Benefit functions and duality’. Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 461–481.
Malmquist. S. (1953), ‘Index numbers and indifference surfaces’, Trabajos de Estotistica 4: 209–242.
McFadden, D. (1978), ‘Cost, revenue, and profit functions’, in Fuss, M. and McFadden, D. (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Mirrlees, J. (1974), ‘Notes on welfare economics, information and uncertainty’, in Balch. M., McFadden, D. and Wu. S. (ed.), Essays on Economic Behaviour under Uncertainty, North-Holland. Amsterdam, pp. 243–61.
Quiggin, J. (2002), ‘Risk and self-protection: a state-contingent view ’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, forthcoming.
Quiggin, J. and R. G. Chambers (1998), ‘A state-contingent production approach to principal-agent problems with an application to point-source pollution control’, Journal of Public Economics 70: 441–472.
Quiggin, J. and R.G. Chambers (2000), ‘Increasing and decreasing risk aversion for generalized preferences’. Working Paper, Australian National University. Canberra.
Quiggin, J. and R.G. Chambers (2001), The firm under uncertainty with general risk-averse preferences: a state-contingent approach, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22 (1): 5–20.
Savage. L. J. (1954), Foundations of statistics, Wiley, New York.
Shephard, R. W. (1953). Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Shogren, J. and T. Crocker (1999), ‘Risk and its consequences’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37 (1): 44–51.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quiggin, J., Chambers, R.G. (2003). The State-contingent Approach to Modeling Environmental Risk Management. In: Babcock, B.A., Fraser, R.W., Lekakis, J.N. (eds) Risk Management and the Environment: Agriculture in Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2915-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2915-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6158-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2915-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive