Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structure, function and development of segmental organs in Annelida

  • Chapter
Reproductive Strategies and Developmental Patterns in Annelids

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 142))

Abstract

In Annelida, nearly each segment contains a pair of ducts that either are protonephridia or metanephridia. These segmental organs function as excretory organs and, after having been modified, they may also act as gonoducts during maturity. In certain polychaetous annelids and especially in clitellates this function has been adopted by additional gonoducts which generally are formed at the begining of maturity. At the end of the last century the gonocoel theory tried to explain the relation between gonads, coelomic cavities and nephridia. Using the gonocoel theory axiomatically, Goodrich (1945) assumed that in annelids a pair of protonephridia and a pair of gonoducts represent the primary condition. Evolution of metanephridia on the one hand and the fusion of gonoducts and nephridia on the other hand occurred within the Annelida. Based on recent ultrastructural investigations into the development of different segmental organs, this paper re-evaluates Goodrich’s hypothesis. According to these data the segmental organs differentiate from a single anlage. Each consists of three or four cells which line a small lumen filled with microvilli. The duct becomes ciliated and the most proximal cells are separated when the coelom extends by fluid accumulation between the lining cells. During enlargement of the coelomic cavity the proximal part of the anlage is passively opened, so that the cilia face the coelom, to form the funnel. If separation of the proximal duct cells is suppressed, the anlage differentiates into a protonephridium, which secondarily may acquire a funnel during maturity by proliferation of proximal duct cells. Thus, different pathways in nephridial development lead to completely different segmental organs in the fertile adult. Additional gonoducts evolve in different lineages within the annelids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adiyodi, K. G., 1988. Annelida. In K. G. Adiyodi, R. G. Adiyodi (eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, vol III, Accessory Sex Glands. J. Wiley, Sons, New York: 189–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, E. J., 1905. The anatomy of Poecilochaetus, Claparède. Q. J micr. Sci. 48: 79–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ax, R, 1989. Homologie in der Biologie - ein Relationsbegriff im Vergleich von Arten. Zool. Beitr. N.F. 32: 487–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., 1989a. Ultrastructure and development of the nephridia in Anaitides mucosa ( Annelida, Polychaeta). Zoomorphology 109: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., 1989b. Ultrastructure and relationship between protonephridia and metanephridia in Phoronis mülleri ( Phoronida ). Zoomorphology 109: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., 1993. Die Leibeshöhlenverhältnisse und Nierenorgane der Bilateria - Ultrastruktur, Entwicklung und Evolution. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Göttingen. 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., 1995. Ultrastructure of the protonephridia in larval Magelona mirabilis (Spionida) and Pectinaria auricoma (Terebellida): head kidneys in the ground pattern of the Annelida. Microfauna Mar. 10: 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., 1997. Structure and development of the nephridia of Tomopteris helgolandica (Annelida). Zoomorphology 117: 1l1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., 1998. Head kidneys in hatchlings of Scoloplos armiger (Annelida: Orbiniida ): Implications for the occurrence of protonephridia in lecithotrophic larvae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 78: 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus, T., P. Ax, 1992. Protonephridia and metanephridia - their relation within the Bilateria. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 30: 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührmann, C., W. Westheide, G. Purschke, 1996. Ultrastructure of the genital organs in the interstitial syllid Petitia amphophthalma ( Annelida, Polychaeta). Acta zool. 77: 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunke, D., 1994. Ultrastructure of the metanephridial system in Aeolosoma bengalense (Annelida). Z000morphology 114: 247258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C., 1986. Microphthalmus ephippiophorus sp.n. (Polychaeta: Hesionidae) and two other Mircophthalmus species from the Bergen area, Western Norway. Sarsia 71: 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. M., 1975. Reversible epitoky in the life history of the polychaete Odontosyllis polycera (Schmarda 1861 ). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 55: 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelbarger, K. J., 1988. Oogenesis and female gametes. In Westheide, W., C. O. Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of the Polychaeta. Microfauna Mar. 4: 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelbarger, K. J., 1992. Polychaeta: Oogenesis. In F. W. Harrison, S. L. Gardiner (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 7, Annelida. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York: 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelbarger, K. J., J. P. Grassle, 1987. Spermatogenesis, sperm storage and comparative sperm morphology in nine species of Capitella, Capitomastus and Capitellides ( Polychaeta: Capitellidae). Mar. Biol. 95: 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisig, H., 1887. Capitelliden. Fauna Flora Golfes Neapel 16: 1–906. Fauchald, K., G. W. Rouse, 1997. Polychaete systematics: Past and present. Zool. Scr. 26: 71–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1895. On the coelom, genital ducts, and nephridia. Q. J. micr. Sci. 37: 477–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1898. On the nephridia of the Polychaeta. Part I. - On Hesione, Tyrrhea and Nephthys. Q. J. micr. Sci. 40: 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1899. On the nephridia of the Polychaeta. Part II. - Glycera and Goniada. Q. J. micr. Sci. 41: 439–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1900. On the nephridia of the Polychaeta. Part III. - The Phyllodocidae, Syllidae, Amphinomidae, etc., with summary and conclusions. Q. J. micr. Sci. 43: 699–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S. 1945. The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Q. J. micr. Sci. 86: 113–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustaysson, L. M., C. Erséus, 1997. Morphogenesis of the genital ducts and spermathecae in Clitellio arenarius, Heterochaeta costata, Tubificoides benedii (Tubificidae) and Stylaria lacustris (Naididae) ( Annelida, Oligochaeta). Acta zool. 78: 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1958. Zur Morphologie der Opheliiden (Polychaeta sedentaria). Z. wiss. Zool. 161: 84–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatschek, B., 1878. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Bilateria. Arb. Zool. Inst. Wien 1: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1988. Oligochaete ultrastructure: some comparisons with the Polychaeta. In Westheide, W., C. O. Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of the Polychaeta. Microfauna Mar. 4: 397–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1992. Oligochaeta. In Harrison, F. W., S. L. Gardiner (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 7, Annelida. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York: 217–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, M., W. Westheide, 1997. Ultrastructure of the male reproductive organs in the interstitial annelid Sphaerosyllis hermaphrodita ( Polychaeta’, Syllidae). Zoomorphology 117: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankester, E. R., 1874. Observations on the development of the pond snail (Lwnnaea stagnalis) and on the early stages of other Mollusca. Q. J. micr. Sci. 14: 365–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankester, E. R., 1900. The enterocoela and coelomocoela. In Lankester, E. R. (ed.), A Treatise on Zoology, Vol. II, Adam, Charles Black, London: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luter, C., T. Bartolomaeus, 1997. The phylogenetic position of the Brachiopoda - a comparison of morphological and molecular data. Zool. Scr. 26: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterman, A. T., 1898. On the theory of archimeric segmentation and its bearing upon the phyletic classification of the Coelomata. Proc. r. Soc. Edinb. 22: 270–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., 1924. Über die Segmentalorgane von Tomopteris helgolandica nebst Bemerkungen über das Nervensystem und die rosettenförmigen Organe. Zool. Anz. 60: 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., 1926. Die Segmentalorgane von Tomopteris catharina (Gosse) nebst Bemerkungen über das Nervensystem, die rosettenförmigen Organe und die Coelombewimperung. Z. wiss. Zool. 127: 297–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E., 1890. Die Abstammung der Anneliden. Der Ursprung der Metamerie und die Bedeutung des Mesoderms. Biol. Centralbl. 10: 296–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim, H. von, 1991a. Ultrastructure and functional morphology of male genital organs and spermatophore formation in Protodrilus ( Polychaeta, Annelida). Zoomorphology 111: 8194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim, H. von, 1991 b. Ultrastructure and functional morphology of the female reproductive organs in Protodrilus ( Polychaeta, Annelida). Helgoländer Meeresunters. 45: 465–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim, H. von, A. Schrader, 1994. Ultrastructure and functional morphology of the protonephridia and segmental fenestrated lacunae in Protodrilus rubropharyngeus ( Polychaeta, Protodrilidae). Helgoländer Meeresunters. 48: 467–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, R J. W., 1970. Reproduction of a Northumberland population of the polychaete Cirratulus cirratus. Mar. Biol. 5: 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, P. J. W., 1975. Reproductive biology of Eulalia riridis (Müller) ( Polychaeta: Phyllodocidae) in the North eastern U.K. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 55: 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrhage, L., 1974. Über die Anatomie, Histologie und Verwandtschaft der Apistobranchidae (Polychaeta Sedentaria) nebst Bemerkungen über die systematische Stellung der Archianneliden. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 79: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. A., 1980. Ultrastructure of the male nephridium and its role in spermatophore formation in spionid polychaetes ( Annelida ). Zoomorphology 95: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G. W., 1993. New Fabricola species (Polychaeta, Sabellidae, Fabricinae) from the Western Atlantic, with a description of sperm and spermathecal utrastructure. Zool. Scr. 22: 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G., 1995. Spermathecae of Fabricia and Manayunkia ( Sabellidae, Polychaeta). Invert. Biol. 114: 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G., K. Fauchald, 1997. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool. Scr. 26: 139–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, E. E., P. R. Smith, 1988. The functional organization of filtration nephridia. Biol. Rev. 171: 231–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvini-Plawen, L. v., H. Splechtna, 1979. Zur Homologie der Keimblätter. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 17: 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, P. C., C. O. Hermans, 1975. Annelida: Polychaeta. In Giese, A. C., J. S. Pearse (eds), Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Vol. III, Annelids and Echiurans. Academic Press, New York: 213 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. R., 1992. Polychaeta: Excretory systems. In Harrison, F. W., S. L. Gardiner (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 7, Annelida. Wiley-Liss, New York: 71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R R., E. E. Ruppert, 1988. Nephridia. In Westheide, W., C. O. Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of the Polychaeta. Microfauna Mar. 4: 231–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. I.. 1988. Mixonephridia or nephromixia in terebellid polychaetes? A clarification. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 91C: 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. I., 1992. Three nephromixial patterns in polychaete species currently assigned to the genus Pista ( Annelida, Terebellidae). J. Morph. 213: 365–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecher, H.-J., 1968. Zur Organisation und Fortpflanzung von Pisione remota (Southern) ( Polychaeta, Pisionidae). Z. Morph. Tiere 61: 347–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vejdovsky, F., 1884. System und Morphologie der Oligochaeten. Franz Rivnäc, Prag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vejdovsky, F., 1892. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen (Heft III). Die Organogenie der Oligochaeten. J. Otto, Prag: 299360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W.. 1978. Ultrastructure of the genital organs in interstitial polychaetes. I. Structure, development, and function of the copulatory stylets in Microphthalmus cf. listensis. Zoomorphologie 91: 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1979a. Hesionides riegerorum n.sp., a new interstitial freshwater polychaete from the United States. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 64: 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1979b. Ultrastruktur der Genitalorgane interstitieller Polychaeten. II. Männliche Kopulationsorgane mit intrazellulären Stilettstäben in einer Microphthalmus-Art. Zool. Ser. 8: III - 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1984. The concept of reproduction in polychaetes with small body size: Adaptation in interstitial species. In Fischer, A., H.-D. Pfannenstiel (eds), Polychaete Reproduction. Fortschr. Zool. 29: 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1985. Ultrastructure of the protonephridia in the dorvilleid polychaete Apodotrocha progenerans (Annelida). Zool. Scr. 14: 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1986. The nephridia of the interstitial polychaete Hesionides arenaria and their phylogenetic significance ( Polychaeta, Hesionidae). Zoomorphology 106: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1988. Genital organs. In Westheide, W., C. O. Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of the Polychaeta. Microfauna Mar. 4: 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1995. Pisione hartmannschroederae sp.n. (Polychaeta: Pisionidae) from a Florida sand beach. Mitt. hamb. zool. Mus. Inst. 92: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1997. The direction of the evolution within the Polychaeta. J. nat. Hist. 31: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., G. Purschke W. Mangerich, 1994. Sinohesione genitaliphora gen. et sp.n. (Polychaeta, Hesionidae), an interstitial annelid with unique dimorphous external genital organs. Zool. Scr. 23: 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., 1851. Report on British Annelida. Rep. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sei. London 21: 159–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., 1858. Researches on the structure and homology of the reproductive organs of the annelids. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. Fond. 148: 93–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltereck, R., 1905. Zur Kopffrage der Anneliden. Verh. Dt. zool. Ges. 15: 154–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltereck, R., 1904. Beiträge zur praktischen Analyse der Polygondius - Entwicklung nach dem `Nordsee’- und dem `Mittelmeertypus’. I. Der für beide Typen gleichverlaufende Entwicklungsabschnitt: vom Ei bis zum jüngsten Trochophora-Stadium. Arch. Entwicklungsmech. 18: 377–403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoomorphologie und Systematik, Fakultät fär Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 100151, D-33501, Bielefeld, Germany

    Thomas Bartolomaeus

Authors
  1. Thomas Bartolomaeus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Zoologie, FB 21, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, D-55099, Mainz, Germany

    Adriaan W. C. Dorresteijn

  2. Spezielle Zoologie, FB 5, Universität Osnabrück, D-49069, Osnabrück, Germany

    Wilfried Westheide

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartolomaeus, T. (1999). Structure, function and development of segmental organs in Annelida. In: Dorresteijn, A.W.C., Westheide, W. (eds) Reproductive Strategies and Developmental Patterns in Annelids. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 142. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2887-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2887-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5340-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2887-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation