Abstract
I shall now try to develop some ideas about the different levels in legal rationality, that is, that of legal scholars, judges, and the parties in the process. Tightly related with the former, there is the role of coherence and its relative weight, according to situations and the people who use it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alexy, Robert: “Problems of discoursive rationality in Law”, paper presented in the 14th World Congress in Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy,, Edinburgh, 1989, p. 4.
Aarnio, Aulis: “Taking rules seriously”, paper presented in the 14th World Congress in Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Edinburgh, 1989, p. 10.
Peczenik, Aleksander and Spector, Horacio: “A theory of moral ought sentences”, ARSP (73), 1987, pp. 451 and ff.
Alexy, Robert: Teoria de la Argumentacion Juridica, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, Madrid, 1989, p. 241.
Aarnio, Aulis: The Rational as Reasonable, Reidel, Dordrecht,, 1987, p. 217.
Elster, Jon: “La posibilidad de una politica racional”, in Leon Olivé (cd.) Racionalidad, Universidad Autonoma de México, 1988, pp. 136, 137.
Peczenik, Aleksander: On Law and Reason,Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989, pp. 74 and ff.
Elster, Jon: op. cit., p. 138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Urbina, S. (1996). On Legal Rationality. In: Reason, Democracy, Society. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2846-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2846-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4759-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2846-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive