Abstract
In this paper, we discuss some rather puzzling facts concerning the semantics of Warlpiri expressions of cardinality, i.e. the Warlpiri counterparts of English expressions like one, two, many, how many. The morphosyntactic evidence, discussed in Section 1, suggests that the corresponding expressions in Warlpiri are nominal, just like the Warlpiri counterparts of prototypical nouns, e.g. child. We also argue that Warlpiri has no articles or any other items of the syntactic category D(eterminer). In Section 2, we describe three types of readings — “definite”, “indefinite” and “predicative” — which are generally found with Warlpiri nouns, including those which correspond to English common nouns and cardinality expressions. A partial analysis of these readings is sketched in Section 3. Since Warlpiri has no determiner system, we hypothesize that the source of (in)definiteness in this language is semantic. More specifically, we suggest that Warlpiri nominals are basically interpreted as individual terms or predicates of individuals and that their three readings arise as a consequence of the interaction of their basic meanings, which are specific to Warlpiri, with certain semantic operations, such as type shifting (Rooth and Partee, 1982; Partee and Rooth, 1983; Partee, 1986, 1987), which universally can or must apply in the process of compositional semantic interpretation.
We wish to thank MarY Laughren, David Nash, Tova Rapoport, Michele Sigler, and Jane Simpson foe Their helpful comments on the first draft of this paper. We also gratefully acknowledge support for this work from the National Science Foundation, companion grants BNS-9108381 and BNS-9108331.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barwise, J. and Cooper, R. (1981) Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
Carlson, Gregory N. (1977) Reference to Kinds in English. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Distributed by GLSA, Dept. of Linguistics, UMASS, Amherst.
Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
Hale, Ken (1973) Person Marking in Warlpiri. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 308–344.
Hale, Ken (1976) The Adjoined Relative Clause in Australia. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 78–105.
Hale, Ken (1983) Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 5–47.
Hale, Ken (1986) Notes on World View and Semantic Categories: Some Waripiri Examples, in Muysken and van Riemsdijk (eds.).
Hale, Ken (1992) Basic Word Order in Two `Free Word Order’ Languages. In Doris Payne (ed.), Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 63–82.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English, Part 1, Journal of Linguistics 3.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1968) Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English, Part 2, Journal of Linguistics 4.
Heim, Irene (1987) Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply? Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables. In E. J. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 21–42.
Hoeksema, Jack (1983) Plurality and Conjunction. In Alice G. B. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 63–84.
Jelinek, Eloise (1984) Empty Categories, Case, and Configurationality, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39–76.
Kratzer, Angelika (1989) Linguistics 610: Semantics and Generative Grammar, unpublished lecture notes, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Landman, Fred (1989) Groups, I, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–606.
Link, G. (1983) The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach. In R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.
Link, G. (1984) Hydras. On the Logic of Relative Clause Constructions with Multiple Heads. In F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 245–258.
Link, G. (1991) Plural. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/Semantics, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 418–441.
Milsark, G. (1974) Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Muysken, Pieter and Riemsdijk, Henk van (eds.) (1986) Features and Projections, Foris, Dordrecht.
Nash, David (1980) Topics in the Grammar of Warlipiri. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Partee, Barbara H. (1986) Ambiguous Pseudo-Clefts with Unambiguous Be. In S. Berman, J. W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, pp. 354–366.
Partee, Barbara H. (1987) Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof (eds.) Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–144.
Partee, Barbara H., Bach, Emmon, and Kratzer, Angelika (1987) Quantification: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, proposal to the National Science Foundation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Partee, Barbara H. and Rooth, Mats (1983) Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity. In R. Bâuerle, C. Schwartze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.
Rapoport, Tova (1990) Secondary Predication and the Lexical Representation of Verbs, Machine Translation 5, 31–55.
Rooth, Mats and Partee, Barbara H. (1982) Conjunction, Type Ambiguity, and Wide Scope or. In D. P. Flickinger, M. Macken, and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 1, Linguistics Dept., Stanford University, pp. 353–362.
Safir, K. (1982) Syntactic Chains and the Definiteness Effect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Simpson, Jane (1983) Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Swartz, Stephen (1985) Pragmatic Structure and Word Order in Warlpiri,SIL manuscript.
Swartz, Stephen (1987) Measuring Naturalness in Translation by Means of a Statistical Analysis of Warlpiri Narrative Texts With Special Emphasis on Word Order Principles, Pacific College of Graduate Studies manuscript.
Taraldsen, Tarald (1978) On the NIC, Vacuous Application, and the That-Trace Filter, MIT manuscript.
Williams, Edwin (1980) Predication, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bittner, M., Hale, K. (1995). Remarks on Definiteness in Warlpiri. In: Bach, E., Jelinek, E., Kratzer, A., Partee, B.H. (eds) Quantification in Natural Languages. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2817-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2817-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3129-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2817-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive