Abstract
This is a survey of some of the principal developments in proof theory from its inception in the 1920s, at the hands of David Hilbert, up to the 1960s. Hilbert’s aim was to use this as a tool in his finitary consistency program to eliminate the “actual infinite” in mathematics from proofs of purely finitary statements. One of the main approaches that turned out to be the most useful in pursuit of this program was that due to Gerhard Gentzen, in the 1930s, via his calculi of “sequents” and his Cut-Elimination Theorem for them. Following that we trace how and why prima facie infinitary concepts, such as ordinals, and infinitary methods, such as the use of infinitely long proofs, gradually came to dominate proof-theoretical developments.
This is the first of three lectures that I delivered at the conference, Proof Theory: History and Philosophical Significance, held at the University of Roskilde, Denmark, Oct. 31—Nov. 1, 1997. I wish to thank the organizers, Prof. Stig Andur Pedersen and Prof. Vincent F. Hendricks for inviting me to present these lectures, and especially for their substantial work in preparing them for publication with the assistance of Mr. Klaus Frovin Jørgensen, from their audio tapes and my transparencies. I have edited the resulting articles for coherence and readability, but otherwise have maintained their character as lectures, as originally given.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aczel, P. Simmons, H. and Wainer, S. (eds.), (1992). Proof Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Avigad, J. and Feferman, S. (1998). “Gödel’s functional (`Dialectics’) interpretation”, in [Buss 1998 ]: 337–405.
Buchholz, W., Feferman, S., Pohlers, W. and Sieg, W., (1981). Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsyterns of Analysis. Recent Proof-theoretical Studies. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 897, Berlin: Springer.
Buchholz, W., (1997). “Explaining Gentzen’s consistency proof within infinitary proof theory”, in Gottlob, G. et al. (eds.), Computational Logic and Proof Theory, KGC `97,Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1289, Berlin: Springer.
Buchholz, W. and Schütte, K., (1988). Proof Theory of Im-predicative Systems. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Buss, S. R. (ed.), (1998). Handbook of Proof Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland
Buss, S. R., (1998). “An introduction to proof theory”, in: 1–78.
Buss, S. R., (1998). “First-order proof theory of arithmetic”, in [Buss 1998 ]: 79–147.
Dreben, B. and Denton, J., (1970). “Herbrand-style consistency proofs”, in [Kino et al. 1970 ]: 419–433.
Fairtlough, M. and Wainer, S. S., (1998). “Hierarchies of provably recursive functions”, in [Buss 1998 ]: 149–207.
Feferman, S., (1987). “Proof theory. A personal report”, appendix to [Takeuti 1987 ]: 447–485.
Feferman, S., (1988). “Hilbert’s program relativized. Prooftheoretical and foundational reductions”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53: 364–384.
Gentzen, G., (1969). The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen. Szabo, M. (ed.), Amsterdam: North Holland.
Girard, J., (1987) Proof Theory and Logical Complexity. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P., (1968). Grundlagen der Mathematik, Vol. I. 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer. Ibid. Vol. II, (2d ed. Berlin: Springer, 1970 ).
Jäger, G., (1986). Theories for Admissible Sets. A Unifying approach to Proof Theory. Naples Bibliopolis.
Kino, A., Myhill, J. and Vesley, R. E. (eds.), (1970). Intuitionism and Proof Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland
Kreisel, G., (1965). “A survey of proof theory”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 33: 321–388.
Mints, G. E., (1991). “Proof theory in the USSR 1925–1969”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56: 385–423.
Mints, G. E., (1992). Selected Papers in Proof Theory. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Mints, G. E., (1991). “Gentzen-type systems and Hilbert’s epsilon substitution method. I”, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, Prawitz, D. et al., (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland: 91–122.
Prawitz, D., (1965). Natural Deduction. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Pohlers, W., (1987). “Contributions of the Schütte school in Munich to proof theory”, appendix to [Takeuti 1987]: 406–431.
Pohlers, W., (1989). Proof Theory. An Introduction. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1407, Berlin: Springer.
Pohlers, W., (1998). “Subsystems of set theory and second order number theory”, in [Buss 1998]: 209–335.
Rathjen, M., (1995). “Recent advances in ordinal analysis: flCA and related systems”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 1: 4684–85.
Schwichtenberg, H., (1997). “Proof theory: some applications of cut-elimination”, in Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Bar-wise, J., (ed.), Amseterdam: North Holland: 867–895.
Sieg, W., (1998). “Hilbert’s program sixty years later”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53: 338–348.
Simpson, S. G., (1988). “Partial realizations of Hilbert’s program”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53: 349–363.
Schütte, K., (1960). Beweistheorie. Berlin: Springer
Schütte, K., (1977). Proof Theory. Berlin: Springer.
Tait, W., (1965). “The substitution method”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 30: 175–192.
Tait, W., (1965). “Normal derivability in classical logic”, in The Syntax and Semantics of Infinitary Languages, Barwise, J. (ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 72, Berlin: Springer: 204–236.
Takeuti, G., (1987). Proof Theory. 2nd edn. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Troelstra, A. S., Schwichtenberg, H., (1996). Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feferman, S. (2000). Hightlights in Proof Theory. In: Hendricks, V.F., Pedersen, S.A., Jørgensen, K.F. (eds) Proof Theory. Synthese Library, vol 292. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2796-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2796-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5553-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2796-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive