Abstract
Phenolic compounds are commonly regarded as the main chemical defenses of deciduous woody plants against insects. To examine how indices of leaf maturation (water content, toughness, and sugar/protein ratio) modified larval consumption and growth relative to phenolics and phenolic-related leaf traits, we measured consumption and growth of fourth-instar Epirrita autumnata (Bkh.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) larvae on three different days on young, normal, and mature leaves, respectively, from the same mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii (Orlova) Hämet-Ahti) trees. The larvae achieved the same growth rates on young and normal leaves, but had to consume 40% more on the latter. On more mature leaves, larval growth was poorer and was positively correlated with sugar/protein ratios (although the ratio peaked at that time). Indices of leaf maturation correlated with several phenolics in data pooled over the three study days, but poorly in any individual day. Similarly, in the pooled data, larval consumption and growth correlated with several leaf traits, but correlations between leaf and insect traits were few on any of the three days, and no trait was significant on each of the three days.
We next examined whether variation in the maturation indices modified the associations of phenolics with insect consumption and growth. When interactions between phenolics and leaf maturation indices were taken into account, the number of phenolic compounds displaying significant associations with insect traits more than doubled. The relative importance of interactive versus direct associations increased with leaf maturation: on young leaves five phenolics showed direct and eleven interactive associations with insect traits, while in mature leaves we found two phenolics to display direct and thirteen phenolics interactive associations. Leaf water content, either alone or together with toughness and sugar/protein ratio, generally explained more of the variance in Epirrita growth (up to 59%) than any phenolic or phenolic-related trait alone (highest value 20%). Including interactive effects between phenolics and indices of leaf maturation in the model increased the proportion explained of variance in larval growth between 49 and 73%. Maturation indices explained 0 to 23% of variance in consumption, and the phenolic compound with the highest (positive!) correlation alone up to 28%, but taking into account interactions between phenolics and maturation indices raised the degree of explanation much (namely, 32 to 53%) over that explained by indices of leaf maturation alone. This indicates strong interactive effects on consumption between phenolics and indices of leaf maturation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berenbaum, M. R. & A. R. Zangerl, 1996. Adaptation or random variation? In: J. T. Romeo, J. A. Saunders & P. Barbosa (eds), Phytochemical Diversity and Redundancy in Ecological Interactions. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–24.
Broadway, R. M. & S. S. Duffey, 1988. The effect of plant protein quality on insect digestive physiology and the toxicity of plant proteinase inhibitors. Journal of Insect Physiology 34: 1111–1117.
Brown, M.B. & A.B. Forsythe, 1974. Robust tests for equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 364–367.
Coley, P. D., 1983. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecological Monographs 53: 209–233.
Cook, R.J. & V.T. Farewell, 1996. Multiplicity considerations in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A 159: 93–110.
Feeny, P., 1970. Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51: 565–581.
Firn, R. D. and C. G. Jones, 1996. An explanation of secondary product “redundancy”. In: J. T. Romeo, J. A. Saunders and P. Barbosa (eds), Phytochemical Diversity and Redundancy in Ecological Interactions. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 295–312.
Haukioja, E. and S. Neuvonen, 1985. The relationship between male size and reproductive potential in Epirrita autumnata (Lep., Geometridae ). Ecological Entomology 10: 267–270.
Kaitaniemi, P., K. Ruohomäki, V. Ossipov, E. Haukioja and K. Pihlaja, 1998. Delayed induced changes in the biochemical composition of host plant leaves during an insect outbreak. Oecologia 116: 182–190.
Kause, A., V. Ossipov, E. Haukioja, K. Lempa and S. Hanhimäki, 1999b. Multiplicity of biochemical factors determining quality of growing birch leaves. Oecologia 120: 102–112.
Kause, A., I. Saloniemi, E. Haukioja and S. Hanhimäki, 1999a. How to become large quickly: Quantitative genetics of growth and foraging in a flush feeding lepidopteran larva. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 471–482.
Mattson, W.J. and J.M. Scriber, 1987. Nutritional ecology of insect folivores of woody plants: nitrogen, water, fiber, and mineral considerations. In: F. Slansky, Jr. and J. G. Rodriquez (eds), Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders and Related Invertebrates. John Wiley, New York, pp. 105–146.
Ossipov, V., J. Loponen, S. Ossipova, E. Haukioja and K. Pihlaja, 1997. Gallotannins of birch Betula pubescens leaves: HPLC separation and quantification. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 25: 493–504.
Ossipov, V., E. Haukioja, S. Hanhimäki and K. Pihiaja, 2001. Phenolic and phenolic-related factors as determinants of suitability of mountain birch leaves to an herbivorous insect. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 29: 223–240.
Ossipova, S., V. Ossipov, E. Haukioja, J. Loponen & K. Pihlaja, 2001. Proanthocyanidins of mountain birch leaves: quantification and properties. Phytochemical Analysis 12: 128–133.
Perneger, T. V., 1998. What’s wrong with the Bonferroni adjustments? Biomedica Journal 16: 1236–1238.
Raubenheimer, D. & S.J. Simpson, 1994. The analysis of nutrient budgets. Functional Ecology 8: 783–791.
Rüpi, M., V. Ossipov, K. Lempa, E. Haukioja, J. Koricheva, S. Ossipova & K. Pihiaja, 2002. Seasonal changes in birch leaf chemistry: are there trade-offs between leaf growth and accumulation of phenolics? Oecologia 130: 380–390.
Rothman, K.J., 1990. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1: 43–46.
SAS Inc., 1996. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 6. 12. Gary, NC.
Simpson, S. J. & D. Raubenheimer, 2001. The geometric analysis of nutrient-allelochemical interactions: a case study using locusts. Ecology 82: 422–439.
Slansky, F., Jr., 1993. Nutritional ecology: The fundamental quest for nutrients. In: N. E. Stamp & T. M. Casey (eds), Caterpillars. Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 29–91.
Suomela, J., V. Ossipov & E. Haukioja, 1995. Variation among and within mountain birch trees in foliage phenols, carbohydrates and amino acids, and in growth of Epirrita autumnata larvae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 1421–1446.
Tammaru, T., 1998. Determination of adult size in a folivorous moth: constraints at instar level? Ecological Entomology 23: 80–89
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haukioja, E., Ossipov, V., Lempa, K. (2002). Interactive effects of leaf maturation and phenolics on consumption and growth of a geometrid moth. In: Nielsen, J.K., Kjær, C., Schoonhoven, L.M. (eds) Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Series Entomologica, vol 57. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2776-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2776-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6129-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2776-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive