General and Specific Abilities as Predictors of Reading Achievement

  • Peter De Jong
  • Aryan Van Der Leij
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 15)

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has been devoted to the search for early and specific predictors of reading achievement, i.e., of word decoding and reading comprehension. Phonological abilities are believed to be a major determinant of the development of word decoding (Wagner & Torgesen, 1987) and are generally found to be better predictors than measures of vocabulary (Baddeley & Gathercole, 1992; Mann & Ditunno, 1990; Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1994), In contrast, vocabulary seems to be a major determinant of reading comprehension (Anderson & Freebody, 1981; Bast, 1995, but see Schneider & Näslund, in press).

Keywords

Reading Comprehension Phonological Awareness General Ability Phonological Code Rapid Naming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117 ). Newark, DE.: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (1992). Learning to read: The role of the phonological loop. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 153–167 ). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bast, J. W. (1995). The development of individual differences in reading ability. Duivendrecht, The Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit, Paedologisch Instituut.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bleichrodt, N. D., Drenth, P. J. D., Zaal, J. N., & Resing, W. C. M. (1987). Revisie Amsterdamse Kinder Intelligente Test [Revision of the Amsterdam Intelligence Test for Children]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  9. Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1979). Een-minuut-test [One-minute-test]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Jong, P. F., Klapwijk, M. J. G., & Van der Leij, A. (1995). Cognitieve en sociaal-emotionele vaardigheden van kleuters in relatie tot hun etnische afkomst [Cognitive and social-emotional abilities of kindergarten children as related to their ethnic origins]. Pedagogische Studiën, 72, 172–185.Google Scholar
  12. De Jong, P. F., & Van der Leij, A. (1998). School careers from 4 to 7: The relationship between cognitive development and the acquisition of reading and arithmetic. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Department of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children’s test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustafsson, J. E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustafsson, J. E., & Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 407–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leseman, P. (1993). How parents provide young children with access to literacy. In L. Eldering & P. Leseman (Eds.), Early intervention and culture (pp. 149–171 ). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Unesco Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Mann, V. A., & Ditunno, P. (1990). Phonological deficiencies: Effective predictors of future reading problems. In G. Pavlidis (Ed.), Perspectives on dyslexia (Vol. 2, pp. 105–131 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal analysis of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar
  20. Schneider, W., & Näslund, J. C. (in press). The impact of early phonological processing skills on reading and spelling in school: Evidence from the Munich Longitudinal Study. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schoonen, R., & Damhuis, R. (1992). Taalplan Toetsen: Constructie en verantwoording van programmagebonden woo rdenschattoetsen ten behoeve van Taalplan Kleuters groep 1 en 2 [Vocabulary tests related to the method for language teaching Taalplan]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, SCO—Department of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Schroots, J. J. F., & Van Alphen de Veer, R. J. (1976). Leidse Diagnostische Test: handleiding [Leiden Diagnostic Test Battery: Manual]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  23. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Snow, C. E. (1991). The theoretical basis for relationships between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 6, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snow, C. E. (1993). Linguistic development as related to literacy. In L. Eldering (Ed.), Early intervention and culture (pp. 132–147 ). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Unesco Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Staphorsius, G., Krom, R. S. H., & de Geus, K. (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdlectuur [Frequencies of word types and positions of letters in literature for the youth]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.Google Scholar
  27. Vellutino, F., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–364.Google Scholar
  28. Verhoeven, L. (1993). Lezen met begrip 1 [Reading with comprehension 1]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.Google Scholar
  29. Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (1986). Taaltoets voor allochtone kinderen. Handleiding [Language Test for children of ethnic minorities]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
  30. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.Google Scholar
  31. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter De Jong
  • Aryan Van Der Leij

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations