Training of Phonological Awareness and Letter Knowledge in Children-at-Risk

  • Ellen Roth
  • Wolfgang Schneider
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 15)


Research on the acquisition of literacy conducted in the last few years has indicated that phonological awareness without a doubt plays an important role in the acquisition of reading and spelling. (e.g., Goswami & Bryant, 1990; Lundberg, Frost, & Petersen, 1988; Tornéus, 1984; Wagner & Torgesen, 1987). Phonological awareness involves the ability to segment speech into linguistic units such as syllables or phonemes. Available studies propose that it is important for the beginning reader to get insight into the sound structure of language in order to acquire the alphabetic principle.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, L. L. (1988). Making connections in learning to read and spell. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, L. L., & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter know-ledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313–321.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 49–72.Google Scholar
  6. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41–57.Google Scholar
  8. Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marx, H., Jansen, H., Mannhaupt, G., & Skowronek, H. (1993). Predictions of difficulties in reading and spelling on the basis of the Bielefeld Screening. In H. Grimm & H. Skowronek (Eds.), Language acquisition problems and reading disorders: Aspects of diagnosis and intervention (pp. 219–242 ). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Schneider, W. (1989). Möglichkeiten zur frühen Vorhersage von Leseleistungen im Grundschulalter. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 3, 157–168.Google Scholar
  11. Schneider, W., Kuespert, P., Roth, E., & Visé, M. (1997). Short-and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 311–340.Google Scholar
  12. Schneider, W., Visé, M., Reimers, P., & Blaesser, B. (1994). Auswirkungen eines Trainings der sprachlichen Bewußtheit auf den Schriftspracherwerb in der Schule. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 8, 177–188.Google Scholar
  13. Tornéus, M. (1984). Phonological awareness and reading: A chicken and egg problem? Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1346–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen Roth
  • Wolfgang Schneider

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations