Abstract
Prof. E. Aggazzi’s report presents some ideas on the evolution in philosophy of science and history of science. He is quite justified in noting that the general trend of their progress points towards close interaction between these branches of knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Agassi, J.: Science in Flux,D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975. 12. `The confusion between science and technology in the standard philosophies of science’, pp. 282–305. 13 `Positive evidence in science and technology’, pp. 306–321. 14. `Positive evidence as a social institution’, pp. 322–337.
Albraght, E., and Kant, H.: ‘Philosophische problems des Eyklus wissenschaft-TechnikProduction’, Deutsche Z. Für Philosophie, B., 1976, Jg. 24, N3, S. 245–260.
Banse, G.: ‘Philosophische Fragen der technischen Wissenschaften — Probleme und Ergebnisse’, Deutsche Z. für Philosophie,B., 1976, Jg. 24. N3, S. 307–318. Buchanen, E.: Technology and History.
Buchanan, R.A.: The Promethean revolution: Science, technology and history, in: History of TechnologyI ann. vol. 1976, L., 1976, pp. 73–83.
Friedrich, H.: ‘Philosophische Fragen der Technologieproblematik’ Deutsche Z. für PhilosophieB., 1977, Jg. 25, NI, S. 5–14.
Daumas, M.: `The history of technology: its aims limits, its methods’, in: History of TechnologyI ann. vol., 1976, L., 1976, pp. 85–112.
Jarvie J.: ‘The social character of technological problems’, in (ed.) Contributions to a Philosophy of TechnologyDordrecht—Boston. 1974, pp. 86–92.
Pacey, A.: The Maze of Ingenuity: Ideas and Idealism in the Development of Technology L.1974.
Philosophical Problems of Science & Technology,ed. by A.C. Michalos, Boston (Mass.), Allan & Bacon, 1974, XII, 623 p., Ind: pp. 605–623.
Rapp, F.: ‘Technological and scientific knowledge’, in: 5th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. L.. 1975. Contributed papers. s. 1 (1975).
Skolimosky, G.: ‘Structure of technological thought’, in: Contribution to a Philosophy of TechnologyDordrecht—Boston, 1974, pp. 72–85.
Melestschenko, ‘U.S. Technical sciences’, in his book: Technique and regularity of its developmentLeningrad, 1970 (in Russian).
Uvarova, L.I.: Scientific Progress and Development of Technical Means, Moscow, 1973 (in Russian).
Specification of Technical Sciences,Moscow, 1975 (in Russian).
Ivanov, B.I. and Cheschev, V.V.: Formation and Development of Technical Sciences. Leningrad, 1977, (in Russian).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uvarova, L.I. (1980). Interrelations between History of Science and Philosophy of Science in Research in the Development of Technical Sciences. In: Hintikka, J., Gruender, D., Agazzi, E. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking, Thermodynamics and the Interaction of the History and Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library, vol 146. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2766-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2766-2_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8361-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2766-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive