Skip to main content

Capturing Motion Verb Generalizations in Synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammars

  • Chapter
Predicative Forms in Natural Language and in Lexical Knowledge Bases

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 6))

Abstract

This chapter describes the use of verb class memberships expressed as semantic features as a means of capturing generalizations about manner-of-motion verbs in Synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammars, STAGs, (Shieber and Schabes, 1990; Shieber and Schabes, 1991), which characterize transductions between Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammars, LTAG, (Joshi, 1985; Schabes et al., 1988). Our approach allows STAGs, which are essentially transfer-based, to take advantage of the same types of generalizations which are generally thought of as wholly the domain of interlingua systems, without giving up any of the lexical specificity unique to transfer-based systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • In 28h Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abeillé, A. and Schabes, Y. (1989). Parsing Idioms in Lexicalized TAGs. In Proceedings of EACL ‘89, pages 161–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in english and spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Societ,Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. (1993). HyTAG: A new Type of Tree Adjoining Grammars for Hybrid Syntactic Representation of Free Word Order Languages. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, E. J., Copestake, A., and de Paiva, V. (1994). Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. J. Fillmore, P. K. and O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Candito, M.-H. (1996). A principle-based hierarchical representation of ltags. In Proceedings of COLING-96,Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A. and Sanfilippo, A. (1993). Multilingual lexical representation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Building Lexicons for Machine Translation,Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, Hockey, Hopely, Nasr, Rambow, Rosenzwieg, Sarkar, Srinivas, and Xia (1997). Maintaining the forest and burning out the underbrush in xtag. In Computational Environments For Grammar Development And Linguistic Engineering, A CL-97 Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, B. (1993). Machine Translation: A View from the Lexicon. MIT Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egedi, D., Palmer, M., Park, H., and Joshi, A. (1994). Korean to english translation using synchronous tags. In First Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas,Columbus, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C., Xia, F., Palmer, M., and Rosenzweig, J. (1996). Capturing language specific constraints on lexical selection with feature-based lexicalized tree-adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Chinese Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. K. (1985). Tree Adjoining Grammars: How much context Sensitivity is required to provide a reasonable structural description. In Dowty, D., Karttunen, I., and Zwicky, A., editors, Natural Language Parsing, pages 206–250. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. K., Levy, L., and Takahashi, M. (1975). Tree Adjunct Grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge, R. and Polguere, A. (1991). Dependency grammars for bilingual text generation: Inside fog’s stratificational models. In Proceedings the International Conference on Current Issues in Computational Linguistics,Penang, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English Verb’ Classes and Alternation, A Preliminary Investigation. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. and Rappaport-l-lovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity. At the syntax-semantics interface. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M., Park, H., and Egedi, D. (1995). The application of korean-english machine translation to a military message domain. In Fifth Annual IEEE Dual- Use Technologies and Applications Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M., Rosenzweig, J., Dang, H., and Xia, F. (1997). Capturing syntactic/semantic generalizations in a lexicalized grammar. presentation in working session of Semantic Tagging Workshop, ANLP-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M., Weir, C., Passonneau, R., and Finin, T. (1993). The kernel text understand- ing system. Artificial Intelligence, 63:17–68. Special Issue on Text Understanding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. and Wu, Z. (1995). Verb semantics for english-chinese translation. Machine Translation, 10: 59–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabes, Y. (1990). Mathematical and Computational Aspects of Lexicalized Grammars. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabes, Y., Abeillé, A., and Joshi, A. K. (1988). Parsing strategies with lexicalized’ grammars: Application to Tree Adjoining Grammars. In Proceedings of the 12` h International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’88),Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S. and Schabes, Y. (1990). Synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammars. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING ‘80),Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S. and Schabes, Y. (1991). Generation and Synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammars. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Lan- guage Typology and Syntactic Description,volume 3. Cambridge University Press. Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Parasession,Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay-Shanker, K. and Joshi, A. K. (1991). Unification-based Grammars, chapter Unification Based Tree Adjoining Grammar. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C. (1996). Interlingua-based Machine Translation of Spatial Expressions. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, Department of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palmer, M., Rosenzweig, J., Schuler, W. (1999). Capturing Motion Verb Generalizations in Synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammars. In: Saint-Dizier, P. (eds) Predicative Forms in Natural Language and in Lexical Knowledge Bases. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2746-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2746-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5146-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2746-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics