Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 6))

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the set of agentive nominals and argue that, in spite of their heterogenous behavior, we can find generalizations by characterizing their semantic properties in terms of the stage-level and individual -level distinction. This parallel with the domain of predicates provides a useful semantic classification of the class of agentive nouns and explains a range of syntactic phenomena as well as issues of semantic interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach, E. (1981). “On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics,” in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C. (1995). “Episodic -ee in English,” in Aquilex Workshop on Lexical Rules, Cambridge, UK, August 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busa, F. (1996). Compositionality and the Semantics of Nominals, Ph.D. Dissertation, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busa, F. 1997. Aspectual Nominals,ms., Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachussetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. (1982). “Generic Terms and Generic Sentences,” in Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1995). “Individual-Level Predicates as Inherent Generics”, in Carlson G. and F. Pelletier, (eds.) The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government arid Binding, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declerk, R. (1988). “Restrictive When-Clauses,” in Lingustics and Philosophy, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R. (1991). “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection,” in Language, 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. (1984). Syntactic Affixation, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (1980). The Logic of Common Nouns, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1992). “Mme. Tussaud Meets the Binding Theory,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastovsky, D. (1977). “Word-Formation, or: at the Crossroads of Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and the Lexicon,” in Folia Linguistica, X, 1/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., and J. Fodor. (1963). “The Structure of a Semantic Theory,” in Language, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyser, J. and Roeper, T. (1984). “On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English”, in Linguistic Inquiry, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. and D. Sportische (1991). “The Position of Subjects,” Lingua, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1981). “The Notional Category of Modality,” in H.-J. Eikmeyer and H. Reiser, (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches to Word Sematnics, De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1995). “Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates,” in Carlson G. and F. Pelletier, (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M., F. Pelletier, G. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Chierchia, and G. Link (1995). “Genericity: An Introduction,” in Carlson G. and F. Pelletier, (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. 1993. Towards a Lexical Organization of English Verbs, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moens, M. and Steedman (1988). “Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference,” Computational Linguistics, Vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1978) “Events, Processes and States,” Linguistics and Philosophy. Also published in P. Tedeschi, and A. Zaencai, (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Tense and Aspect, vol. 14, Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M. (1987). “Compositionality and the Syntax of Words”, in Groenendijk, J., D. de Jong, and M. Stockhof (eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics, Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, J.M. (1990). Thought and Language, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, G. (1995) “Transfers of Meaning,” Journal of Semantics, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1988). “The Geometry of Events,” in Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect, Carol Tenny (ed.), Lexicon Project Working Papers 24, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1991a). “The Generative Lexicon”, in Computational Linguistics, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (19916). “The Syntax of Event Structure,” in Cognition,41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon,MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1997). “The Semantics of Lexical [lnderspecification,” in Folia Linguistica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. (1982). Morphological Structure and Language Acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport M. and B. Levin. (1992). “-er Nominals: Implications for the Theory of Argument Structure”, in Stowell, T. and E. Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 26, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R. (1985). On Deriving the Lexicon, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. Norm and Action: A Logical Inquiry, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busa, F. (1999). The Semantics of Event-Based Nominals. In: Saint-Dizier, P. (eds) Predicative Forms in Natural Language and in Lexical Knowledge Bases. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2746-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2746-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5146-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2746-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics