Abstract
There can be no doubt that the phenomenon of polarity, though usually the subject of syntactic and semantic study, is essentially of a purely lexical nature.1 This is evident to anyone who is familiar with the distribution of so-called negative polarity items. The fact that expressions such as hoeven and ook maar iets in Dutch, brauchen and auch nur irgendetwas in German, or the English cognates need and anything (at all) require the presence of a negative element somewhere in the sentence, is a property which is intrinsic to the items in question and must therefore be accounted for in the lexicon. If there is any doubt as to the lexical nature of this phenomenon, it is completely eradicated by the distinction between negative polarity items of the weak and those of the strong type. In order to get a clear view of the content of this distinction, one does well to take the following Dutch examples into consideration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barwise, J. (1979). ‘On Branching Quantifiers in English ’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 47–80.
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1981). ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
Benthem, J. (1986). Essays in Logical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bell, J.L. and A.B. Slomson (1969). Models and Ultraproducts. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Biedermann, R. (1969). Die deutschen Gradadverbien in synchronischer und diachronischer Sicht. Doctoral dissertation, University of Heidelberg.
Birkhoff, G. (1967). Lattice Theory. Third edition. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
Chang, C.C. and H.J. Keisler (1977). Model Theory. Second edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Chellas, B.F. (1980). Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalen, D. (1986). ‘Intuitionistic Logic.’ In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume III. Dordrecht: Reidel, 225–339.
De Hoop, H. (1990). ‘On the Characterization of the Weak-Strong Distinction.’ To appear in E. Bach, B. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B. Partee (eds.), Cross-Linguistic Quantification.
De Hoop, H. and M. Kas (1989). ‘Sommige betekenisaspecten van enkele kwantoren, oftewel: enkele betekenisaspecten van sommige kwantoren.’ Tijdschrift voor Taal-en Tekstwetenschap 9, 31–49.
Dummett, M. (1977). Elements of Intuitionism. With the Assistance of R. Minio. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, J.M. (1993), ‘Star and Perp: Two Treatments of Negation.’ Indiana University Logic Group, Preprint No. IULG-93–21, Indiana University, Bloomington. To appear in: James Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives: Philosophical Logic, Vols. 7–8.
Evers, A. (1975). The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Gamut, L.T.F. (1991). Logic, Language, and Meaning. Volume I: Introduction to Logic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hazen, A. (1992) ‘Subminimal Negation.’ Philosophy Department Preprints 1/92, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Hoeksema, J. (1983). ‘Negative Polarity and the Comparative.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 403–434.
Hoeksema, J. (1986). ‘Monotonicity Phenomena in Natural Language.’ Linguistic Analysis 16, 25–40.
Hoppenbrouwers, G. (1983). Negatief en Positief Polaire Elementen in de Taal: Een Onderzoek naar het Syntactisch en Semantisch gedrag van Negatief-en Positief Polaire Elementen. M.A. thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Keenan, E.L. and L.M. Faltz (1985). Boolean Semantics for Natural Language. Dordrecht, Reidel.
Krifka, M. (1989). ‘Some Remarks on Polarity Items.’ D. Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics. Dordrecht, Foris.
Krifka, M. (1990). ‘Polarity Phenomena and Alternative Semantics.’ In: M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet, eds., Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: Institute for Language, Logic and Information, 277–301.
Kürschner, W. (1983). Studien zur Negation im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
Ladusaw, W.A. (1979). Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club. Also published, New York: Garland Press, 1980.
Ladusaw, W.A. (1980). ‘On the Notion Affective in the Analysis of Negative-Polarity Items.’ Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 1–16.
Ladusaw, W.A. (1983). ‘Logical Form and Conditions on Grammaticality.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 373–392.
Milsark, G.L (1977). ‘Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English.’ Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.
Os, C. (1989). Aspekte der Intensivierung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
Pullum, G.K. and G. Gazdar (1982) ‘Natural Languages and Context-Free Languages.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 471–504.
Quine, W.V. (1974). Methods of Logic. Third edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Seuren, P.A.M. (1976). ‘Echo: een studie in negatie.’ In: G. Koefoed and A. Evers (eds.), Lijnen van Taaltheoretisch Onderzoek: Een Bundel Oorspronkelijke Opstellen Aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. H. Schultink. Groningen: Tjeenk Willink, 160–184.
Seuren, P.A.M. (1985). Discourse Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell. Sikorski, R. (1969). Boolean Algebras. Third edition. Berlin: Springer.
Stoll, R.R. (1974). Sets, Logic, and Axiomatic Theories. Second edition. San Francisco: Freeman.
Stone, M.H. (1937). ‘Algebraic Characterization of Special Boolean Rings.’ Fundamenta Mathematicae 29, 223–303.
Wouden, T. (1994a). ‘Polarity and ‘Illogical Negation’. In: M. Kanazawa and C.J. PiÃión, eds., Dynamics, Polarity, and Quantification. CSLI Lecture Notes 48. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 17–45.
Wouden, T. (1994b). Negative Contexts. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Zwarts, F. (1981). ‘Negatief polaire uitdrukkingen I.’ GLOT: Tijdschrift voor Taalwetenschap 4, 35–132.
Zwarts, F. (1983). ‘Determiners: A Relational Perspective.’ In: A.G.B. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics. Dordrecht, Foris, 37–62.
Zwarts, F. (1986). Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek: Een Onderzoeknaar Negatie en Polariteit in het Nederlands. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Zwarts, F. (1991). ‘Negation and Generalized Quantifiers.’ In: J. van der Does and J. van Eijck (eds.), Generalized Quantifier Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: Dutch Network for Language, Logic and Information, 443–462.
Zwarts, F. (1993). ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Negative Polarity.’ Manuscript, University of Groningen.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zwarts, F. (1998). Three Types of Polarity. In: Hamm, F., Hinrichs, E. (eds) Plurality and Quantification. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 69. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2706-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2706-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4943-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2706-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive