Abstract
In any society, political participation presupposes membership in the political community. From a legal perspective, it is often citizenship which grants a person privileges of political participation. This Article explores the reasons for the relationship between political participation and membership and argues that membership should not be identified with citizenship. Instead, membership entails a certain range of identities, affiliations and loyalties which qualify a person to participate in the political discourse. The requirement of membership constrains the value-pluralism of a liberal society and dictates whose voice is meaningfully part of political discourse. The article exploits numerous rules and practices governing political discourse and constructs a distinct rationale for their existence. Foreign participation in political discourse is analogous to an uninvited attempt to provide advice and to participate in the deliberation governing one’s intimate affairs (for example the way one should raise one’s children). Constraints on foreign participation therefore guarantee the intimacy of political discourse and preserve the authorship of the members of the political community over the deliberative process.
Using this analogy, the paper examines the citizens’ duties and argues that membership dictates a certain degree of identification with the political community. Most importantly, it limits the range of conflicting identities which a participant in the political community can have. To demonstrate it, this article also analyzes the concept of hyphenated identities. Hyphenated identities are often legitimate and desirable; yet sometimes they conflict with membership in ways which undermines one’s identity as a member of the political community and disqualify her from political participation.
I wish to express my gratitude to Yuval Aayalon, Lior Barshack, Eyal Benvenisti, Brian Bix, Allan Brudner, Joseph Carens, David Enoch, David Estlund, Elizabeth Garret, Chaim Gans, David Heyd, Tamar Miseles, Mike Otsuka, Harry Rajak, Oren Shriqui, Daniel Statman and Bert van den Brink.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969 ).
Brown, Bruce D., “Aliens Donors: The Participation of Non-Citizens in the U.S. Campaign Finance System”, Yale L. Policy Rev., 15 (1997), 503
Carens, Joseph H., Culture, Citizenship and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). Cohen, Geula. “Referendum (Which) Nation”, Yediot Acharonot, March 15 (1991)
Cohen, Joshua, “Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus” in David Copp, Jean Hampton and John E. Roemer (eds.), The Idea of Democracy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993 ).
Cohen, Joshua, “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy” in James Bohman and William Rehg (eds.). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge Mass and London: MIT Press,1997)
Cohen, Joshua, “Democracy and Liberty” in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 )
Dryzek, John S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 ).
Ehninger, Douglas, “Towards a Taxonomy of Prescriptive Discourse” in White Eugene (ed.), Rhetoric In Transition
Elster, Jon, “Introduction” in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press. Cambridge. 1998 ).
Garett, Elizabeth,“Issues in Implementing Referendums in Israel: A Comparative Study in Direct Democracy”, 2 (’hi. J. Intl L. (2001) (forthcoming)
Harel, Alon, “Liberalism Versus Jewish Nationalism: A Case for the Separation of Zionism and State”, 3 Democratic Culture ( Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press, 2000 ).
Johnson, James, “Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations” in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 ).
Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Citizenship ( Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1995 )
Mandelstams, Osip. “The Stalin Epigram” in Selected Poems ( N.Y: Athenum, 1974 ).
Miller, David, Citizenship und National Identity (Polity Press, 2000 ).
Modood, Tariq, “Multiculturalism, and the Recognition of Religious Groups” in Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 ).
Moon, J. Donald, Constructing Community: Moral Pluralism and Tragic Conflicts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993 ).
Note, Charles Lawson, “Shining the ”Spotlight of Pitiless Publicity“ on Foreign Lobbyists? Evaluating the Impact of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1996 on Foreign Registration Act 29”. rand. J. Transnat l L. (1996)
Note, Charles Lawson, “Foreign” Campaign Contributions and the First Amendment Harvard L. Rev., 110 (1997).
Powell, Jeffrey, “Comment: Prohibitions on Campaign Contributions from Foreign Sources: Questioning Their Justification in a Global Interdependent Economy”, l7 U. Pa J. Intl Econ. L. (1996).
Rawls. John, Political Liberalism ( NY: Columbia University Press, 1996 ).
Raz, Joseph, “Free Expression and Personal Identification” Oxford J. Legal Studies, 11 (1991).
Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement ( Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999 ).
Young, Iris Marion, Inclusion and Democracy ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harel, A. (2001). The Boundaries of Democratic Pluralism. In: Soeteman, A. (eds) Pluralism and Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5722-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2702-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive