Skip to main content

Human Rights and the Partial Eclipse of Justice

  • Chapter
Pluralism and Law
  • 261 Accesses

Abstract

This essay explores the moral limitations of human rights discourse by developing some comparisons with the discourse of justice. Having made important distinctions between human rights law and human rights morality, and analysing justice in its distinctive sense as a combination of equal worth and unequal worthiness, consideration is given to the content of human rights and justice values. Human rights law is contrasted with the overlapping but sometimes divergent discourse of justice with respect to its focus on liberty as opposed to equality, and its minimalism in contrast to the more aspirational discourse of justice. The essay concludes by considering the competing strategies of either expanding the content and form of human rights law at the risk of undermining the role of elected governments, or reaffirming justice as a prime duty of governments that transcends the commitment to human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bandes, S., “The Negative Constitution: A Critique”, Michigan Law Review, 88 (1990), 2271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D. and R. Brownsword, “Human Dignity, Human Rights and Human Genomes”, Modern Law Review, 61 (1998), 661–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne-Wilkinson. L., “The Infiltration of a Bill of Rights”, Public Law (1992),397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, M., “Are There Any Human Rights?”, Daedalus (1963), 112, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranson, M., “Human Rights, Real and Supposed”, in D D Raphael, Political Theory and the Rights of Man ( London: Macmillan, 1967 ), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T., The Left and Rights ( London: Routledge, 1983 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T., Mental Illness: Prejudice, Discrimination and the Law (Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1991 ). Campbell, T., The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism ( Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T., Justice (London: Macmillan, 2001) (2001a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell. T.. “Democratising Human Rights”, in T Campbell and B Leiser. human Rights in Philosophy und Practice (Dartmouth: Aldershot, 2001), 172–186 (2001b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J., “Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytical Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human Rights”, American Political Science Review, 76 (1982), 303–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously ( London: Duckworth, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., “What is Equality?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1981), 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., Freedom’s Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution ( Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, R.H., “The Rule of Law as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse”, Columbia Law Review, 97 (1997), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kairys, D., The Politics of Law: a Progressive Critique ( New York: Basic Books, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinley. D., ‘The Legal Dimensions of Human Rights“, in D Kinley, ed, Human Rights in Australian Law ( Sydney: Federation Press, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Pull of the Mainstream“, Michigan Law Review, 88 (1990), 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J., Two Treatises on Government ( London: Mentor. 1960 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meron, T., “On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights” American Journal of International Law,801(986), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom ( Oxford: Clarendon, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, O., “Human Dignity as a Normative Concept”, American Journal of International Law, 77 (1983), 848–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, L.B., ‘The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals rather than States“, American University Law Review, 32 (1982), 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teson, F.R., “International Human Rights and Cultural Relativism”, t’irginia Journal of International Law, 25 (1985), 869–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R., Anarchy State and Utopia (Blackwell, Oxford: Blackwell, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J., “The Rule of Law in Liberal Theory”, Ratio Juris, 2 (1989), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, T. (2001). Human Rights and the Partial Eclipse of Justice. In: Soeteman, A. (eds) Pluralism and Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5722-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2702-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics