Abstract
Einstein’s theory of relativity provided a challenge to many physicists and philosophers. Some of the fathers of logical empiricism started their scientific careers with analyses of the revolutionary changes forced upon them by the theory of relativity in the concepts of space, time, mass, energy, and causality. Philipp Frank (1884–1966) published several articles on relativity before he acceded to Einstein’s chair in Prague in 1912. Moritz Schlick (1882–1936) published a book on relativity (1917) and another one on general epistemological problems (1918) and discussed these subjects with Einstein who supported his move to Vienna in 1922. Hans Reichenbach (1891–1953) was among the few students in Einstein’s first seminar on general relativity in Berlin and developed his own method of logical analysis of scientific theories by analyzing the theory of relativity (1920; 1924; 1928). Later, he declared this method to be the only legitimate one in scientific philosophy. Einstein liked Reichenbach’s ability to analyze contemporary physical theories and supported his efforts to receive an academic position. Last but not least, Rudolf Carnap (1981–1970) — whose knowledge in physics should not be compared with Frank’s, Schlick’s and Reichenbach’s — wrote a dissertation on space (1922) in which he prepared his later logical reconstructions of scientific language. Whereas the theory of relativity existed before the new philosophy of science developed in Vienna, Prague, Berlin, the development of this philosophy was immediately challenged by another physical theory, quantum mechanics. But quantum theory confronted physicists and philosophers with a situation different from relativity theory.
Deceased.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J.: 1936, ‘The Logic of quantum mechanics’, in: Annals of Mathematics 37, 823–843.
Bohr, N.: 1934, Atomic Theory and Description of Nature,Cambridge.
Bohr, N.: 1939, ‘The causality problem in atomic physics’, in: New Theories in Physics, Paris, pp. 11–46.
Bohr, N.: 1958, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge,New York.
Bohr, N.: 1962, Interview with Th. S. Kuhn, A. Petersen and E. Rüdinger, 17 Nov. in: Archive for History of Quantum Physics (unpublished), Copenhagen.
Bohr, N.: 1963, Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, New York. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen. N.: 1935 ‘Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?’, in: Physical Review 47, 777–780.
Frank, Ph.: 1929, ‘Was bedeuten die gegenwärtigen physikalischen Theorien für die allgemeine Erkenntnislehre?’ in: Die Naturwissenschaften 17, 971–977, 987–994.
Frank, Ph.: 1932, Das Kausalgesetz und seine Grenzen,Wien.
Frank, Ph.: 1935 a, ‘Zeigt sich in der modernen Physik ein Zug zu einer spiritualistischen Auffassung?’, in: Erkenntnis 5,65–79.
Frank, Ph.: 1935 b, ‘Jordan und der radikale Positivismus’, in: Erkenntnis 5, 184. Frank, Ph.: 1936/37, ‘Philosophische Deutungen und Mißdeutungen der Quantentheorie’, in: Erkenntnis 6, 303–317.
Frank, Ph.: 1937/38, ‘Physik und logischer Empirismus’, in: Erkenntnis 7, 297–300. Frank, Ph.: 1941, Between Physics and Philosophy,Cambridge, MA.
Frank. Ph.: 1949, Modern Science and Its Philosophy, Cambridge, MA.
Heisenberg, W.: 1927, ‘Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik’, in: Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 172–198.
Heisenberg, W.: 1931, ‘Kausalgesetz und Quantenmechanik’, in: Erkenntnis 2, 172–182. Jordan, P.: 1934, ‘Quantenphysikalische Bemerkungen zur Biologie und Psychologie’, in: Erkenntnis 4, 215–252.
Jordan, P.: 1935, ‘Ergänzende Bemerkungen über Biologie und Quantenmechanik’, in: Erkenntnis 5, 348–352.
Neurath, O.: 1930/31, ‘Historische Anmerkungen’, in: Erkenntnis,pp. 312–314.
Neurath, O.: 1935, Jordan, ‘Quantentheorie und Willensfreiheit’, in: Erkenntnis 5, 179–180.
Reichenbach, H.: 1920, Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori,Berlin.
Reichenbach, H.: 1924, Axiomatik der Relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre,Braunschweig.
Reichenbach, H.: 1925, ‘Die Kausalstruktur der Welt und der Unterschied von Vergangenheit und Zukunft’ in: Sitzungsberichtce der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung 1925, 133–175.
Reichenbach, H.: 1928, Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre,Berlin.
Reichenbach, H.: 1935, ‘Metaphysik bei Jordan?’ in: Erkenntnis 5, 178.
Reichenbach, H.: 1944, Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Reichenbach, H.: 1951, The Rise of Scientific Philosophy,Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Reichenbach, H.: 1989, Philosophische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik und Wahrscheinlichkeit (Gesammelte Werke Band 5), Braunschweig/ Wiesbaden.
Röseberg, U.: 1991, ‘Historical Explanations in Modern Physics: The Lesson of Modern Quantum Mechanics’, in: World Views and Scientific Discipline Formation, ed. by W.R. Woodward and R.S. Cohen, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
Röseberg, U.: ‘Hidden Historicity - the Challenge of Bohr’s Philosophical Thought’, in: Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy,ed. by J. Faye and H. Folse.
Schlick, M.: 1917, Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik. Zur Einführung in das Verständnis der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Berlin (there are other editions 1919, 1922, and 1922 ).
Schlick, M.: 1918, Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, Berlin (2 ed. 1925 ).
Schlick, M.: 1935, ‘Einige Bemerkungen über P. Jordans Versuch einer quantentheoretischen Deutung der Lebenserscheinungen’, in: Erkenntis 5, 181–183.
Shimony, A.: 1985, Reflections on the Philosophy of Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger, in: A Portrait of Twenty-five Years, ed. by R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
Strauss, M.: 1936, ‘Zur Begründung der Statistischen Transformationstheorie der Quantenphysik’, in: Sitzungsberichte der Preussischer Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phys.-math. Klasse 27, 90–113.
Strauss, M.: 1936/37, ‘Komplementarität und Kausalität im Lichte der logischen Syntax’, in: Erkenntnis 6.
Strauss, M.: 1972, Modern Physics and Its Philosophy,Dordrecht.
Zilsel, E.: 1935, ‘Jordans Versuch, den Vitalismus quantenmechanisch zu retten’, in: Erkenntnis 5, 56–64.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Röseberg, U. (1995). Did They Just Misunderstood Each Other? Logical Empiricists and Bohr’s Complementarity Argument. In: Gavroglu, K., Stachel, J., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 163. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4436-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2658-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive