Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einstein in the Land of Nobel: An Episode in the Interplay of Science, Politics, Epistemology and Popular Culture

  • Chapter
Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 163))

  • 226 Accesses

Abstract

1923 was the year Einstein was in Sweden to give his Nobel lecture. Little has been written about this episode, and there is some confusion as to certain details.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Abraham Pais, Subtle is the Lord. The Science and Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford: University Press, 1982), p. 504 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A similar point is made by Paul Forman, “Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Republic: The Ideology and its Manipulation in Germany after World War I’, ISIS 64 (1973), pp. 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The last word in the title was later dropped; see, e.g., the 23rd edition ( Braunschweig/Weisbaden: Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Albert Einstein, Den speciella och den allmänna relativitetsteorin (Göteborg: Daidalos, 1989), with an Introduction by Aant Elzinga.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Svedberg, Arbetets dekadens. Naturvetenskapliga essäer (Stockholm: Hugo Gebers Förlag, 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Arvid Hedvall, Göteborg i Centrum (Göteborg: Rundqvists tryckerie, 1970), p. 57; this book also contains the picture of Einstein on the podium of the Concert Hall in the Liseberg Amusement Park, delivering his Nobel lecture. The same picture is reproduced in Carl-Olow Stawström, `Relative Acceptance. The Introduction and Reception of Einstein’s Theories in Sweden 1905–1965’, in Svante Lindqvist (ed.), Center on the Periphery. Historical Aspects of 20th-Century Swedish Physics ( Canton MA: Science History Publications, 1993 ), p. 298.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mrs. Astrid Petzäl, a daughter of Dr. Gustaf Ekman is thanked for letting me consult a number of letters in her possession, including one by Albert Einstein to Mrs. Ekman.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Einstein’s initials are still there inscribed in a pane of a glass in a window of one of the buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kungl. Vetenskaps-och vitterhetssamhället, KVVS.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedvall, Göteborg i Centrum.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cited after Pais, Subtle is the Lord,p. 509.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carl-Olow Stawström, `Synpunkter pa hur svenska fysiker och filosofer uppfattat Einsteins relativitetsteorier’, Stockholm Papers in History and Philosophy of Technology, no. 2018 (Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology Library, 1986), p. 19. Some of the same territory is covered in Carl-Olov Stawström, `Relative Acceptance’, pp. 293–305; see also Carl-Olov Stawström, Idéhistoriska synpunkter pea innehället i vissa skriftliga arbeten av Carl Wilhelm Oseen’, Stockholm Papers in History and Philosophy of Technology, no. 2019 ( Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology Library, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elisabeth Crawford and Robert Marc Friedman, `The Prizes in Physics and Chemistry in the Context of Swedish Science: a working paper’, in C. G. Bernhard, E. Crawford and P. Sörbom (eds.), Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel ( Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982 ), p. 323. The Prizes in Physics and Chemistry, p. 323.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cited after G. Küppers, N. Ulitzka & P. Weingart `Decisions about the Significance of Science’, in C. G. Bernhard, E.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crawford and P. Sörbom (eds.), Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel ( Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982 ), p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cited after Pais, Subtle is the Lord,p. 503. In accordance with a divorce settlement some years before, the proceeds of the Nobel prize were turned over to Einstein’s ex-wife, his former fellow physics graduate student and companion in Zürich, Mileva Maríc. She bore him two sons in their marriage, and one daughter, in secret, before their marriage. The daughter was put up for adoption via Mileva’s parents in Serbia. There has been some dispute amongst scholars about the extent of Mileva Marie’s role in special relativity theory; some even claim that her name appeared on the famous 1905 paper together with Albert Einstein’s.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See further Michael White and John Gribbin, Einstein. A Life of Science (London: Simon and Schuster, 1993), p. 125; and also Roger Highfield and Paul Carter, The Private Lives of Albert Einstein (London: Faber and Faber, 1993), pp. 108–117. “ See note 36 in Crawford and Friedman, `The Prizes in Physics and Chemistry’, p. 330, and note 36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert Marc Friedman, `The Nobel Prizes and the Invigoration of Swedish Science: Some Considerations’, in Tore Frängsmyr (ed.), Solomon’s House Revisited. The Organization and Institution of Science ( Canton MA: Science History Publications, 1990 ), p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Prizes in Physics and Chemistry’, p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernhard, Crawford and Sörbom (eds.), Science, Technology and Society,p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Decisions about the Significance of Science’, p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Decisions about the Significance of Science’, p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quoted in `Decisions about the Significance of Science’, p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Estimations based on lists in John Tuneld, Akademiska avhandlingar vid Sveriges universitet och högskolor 1910/11–1939/40 ( Lund: Ohissons boktrykerie, 1945 ).

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a similar case where Oseen was also involved, using the renommé of the Nobel prize to advance Swedish science policy interests, see `The Nobel Prizes and the Invigoration of Swedish Science’, pp. 198–201; this was in connection with Manne Siegbahn’s prize in 1925, reserved from 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 21; cf. also Klaus Hentschel, `The rise of antisemitic arguments against Einstein’s theories of relativity in Germany since 1920’, paper at the XVIIIth Congress of History of Science, Hamburg-Munich 1–9 Aug. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elisabeth Crawford, Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880–1939 (Cambridge: University Press, 1992), pp. 67–68; also Elisabeth Crawford, `The Benefits of Nobel Prizes’, in Tore Frängsmyr (ed.), Science in Sweden. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1937–1989 (Canton MA: Science History Publications, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cited after Kjell Jonsson, `Naturvetenskap, världsâskädning och metafysiskt patos i mellankrigstidens Sverige’, Lychnos (1992), p. 128; see also Kjell Jonsson, `Physics as Culture. Science and Weltanschauung in Inter-War Sweden’, in Svante Lindqvist (ed.), Center on the Periphery,pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Georg Henrik von Wright, Vetenskap och förnuftet ( Stockholm: MänPocket, 1988 ), p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Svante Nordin, Fran Hägerström till Hedenius. Den moderna Svenska filosofin ( Lund: Doxa, 1984 ).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kjell Jonsson, Vid vetandets gräns (Lund: Arkiv avhandlingsserie 26, 1987), p. 179 and corresponding note on p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nordin, Fran Hägerström till Hedenius,pp. 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Naturvetenskap, världsâskäadning’, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jonsson, Vid vetandets gräns p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Quoted in Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 27; see also Suzanne Gieser, `Philosophy and Modern Physics in Sweden. C.W. Oseen, Oskar Klein, and the Intellectual Traditions of Uppsala and Lund, 1920–1940’, in Svante Lindqvist (ed.), Center on the Periphery,pp. 24–41, which examines, among other, the debates between physicists and philosophers during the period indicated.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Quoted after Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 31; the final publication was Martin Fries (ed.), Axel Hägerströms Filosofi och Vetenskap (Stockholm: Ehlins, 1957), with commentary by Fries.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Quoted after Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  48. It is interesting to note that Cassirer also wrote a book on Hägerström’ philosophy, but his critical remarks in it deal only with value nihilism, not with Hägerström’s views on relativity theory. E. Cassirer, Alex Hägerström (Göteborg: Högskolan, 1939); see also D. Gawronsky, Ernst Cassirer: his life and his work. In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer (Evanston Ill.: 1949). Malte Jacobsson’s account of Cassirer’s arrival and sojourn in Göteborg can be found in M. Jacobsson, Minnesbilder (Stockholm: 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ernst Cassirer, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity,publ. 1923, and again in 1953 together with Substance and Function (London: Dover Publ., 1953); the quote is from the latter edition, p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hâakan Törnebohm, A Logical Analysis of the Theory of Relativity (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1952); Hakan Törnebohm, Concepts and Principles in the space-time theory within Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity (Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1963 ); Hâakan Törnebohm, A Paradigm Shift in Theories of Gravitation ( Gothenburg: Scandinavian University Books, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  51. For a review of some of these struggles in philosophy, see Svante Nordin, Frdn Hägerström till Hedenius.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cf. Sven-Eric Liedman, `In search of Isis: general education in Germany and Sweden’ in Sheldon Rothblatt and Björn Wittrock (eds.), The European and American University since 1800. Historical and sociological essays (Cambridge: University Press, 1993), pp. 74–106; also Aant Elzinga, `Universities, research and the transformation of the State in Sweden’, in the same volume, Rothblatt and Wittrock (eds.), pp. 191–233.

    Google Scholar 

  53. This was in 1920, and Oseen was the Chairman; see Stawström, `Relative Acceptance’, p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Quoted after Jonsson, Naturvetenskap, världsâaskadning’, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Quoted in Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stawström, Stockholm Papers no. 2018, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Quoted in Jonsson, `Naturvetenskap, världsaskadning’, pp. 129–130 (my translation); also in Jonsson, `Physics as Culture’, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Georg Brandes, Kulturbillider. Studier og Strejftog (Kopenhavn: Hage & Clausens Forlag, 1932), p. 155; I am grateful to Bertil Nolin of the Literature Department at the University of Göteborg for drawing my attention to Brandes’ references to Einstein and the general theory of relativity.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pais, Subtle is the Lord,p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kenji Sugimoto, Albert Einstein. Die Kommentierte Bilddokumentationen ( München: Verlag Moos & Partner, 1987 ), p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  61. See Conny Mithander, `Implications of Technology. The Debate in Context’, in Catharina Landström (ed.), Intellectuals Reading Technology. Proceedings from the Nordic Symposium `Technology-Ideology-Culture’, S.t.i.c. report no. 4 (Göteborg: Theory of Science Department, 1991), pp. 3–25. For an interesting critique of Spengler’s views see Otto Neurath, “Anti-Spengler”, in Rudolf Haller and Heiner Rutte (eds.), Otto Neurath Gesammelte philosophische and methodologische Schriften Band 1 (Wien: Verlag HölderPichler-Tempsky, 1981), pp. 139–196.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See Crawford, Nationalism and Internationalism in Science,also Forman, `Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists’. In what follows I largely rely on these two authors.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists’, pp. 153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists’, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Quoted after, ‘Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists’, p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Crawford, Nationalism and Internationalism in Science,pp. 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Crawford, Nationalism and Internationalism in Science,p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists’, pp. 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Daniel J. Kevles, “Into Hostile Political Camps: The Reorganization of International Science in World War I”, ISIS 62 (1973), pp. 151–180; for a discussion of Einstein’s response to the “appeal of the 93”, signing a pacifist counter appeal initiated by the physiology professor at Berlin University, Georg Nicolai, see White and Gribbin, Einstein. A Life of Science,pp. 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Crawford, Nationalism and Internationalism in Science,pp. 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Gothenburg, Germany

    Aant Elzinga

Authors
  1. Aant Elzinga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Technical University, Athens, Greece

    Kostas Gavroglu

  2. Boston University, USA

    John Stachel

  3. Baruch College, The City University of New York, USA

    Marx W. Wartofsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elzinga, A. (1995). Einstein in the Land of Nobel: An Episode in the Interplay of Science, Politics, Epistemology and Popular Culture. In: Gavroglu, K., Stachel, J., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 163. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4436-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2658-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation