Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Speculative Philosophy of the Triunity in Chinese Universism (TAOISM) and Buddhism

Its Philosophical-Religious Significance and its Contribution to the Taoist-Buddhist-Christian Dialogue

  • Chapter
Philosophy Bridging the World Religions

Part of the book series: A Discourse of the World Religions ((DOWR,volume 5))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

In this essay the onto-dynamics of the triunity in T’ien-t’ai Buddhism, the common foundation of Chinese Universism and the related inter-cultural philosophy of inter-religious dialogue, will be investigated.1 The following themes in the speculative philosophy of Buddhism and the related inter-religious dialogue will be discussed:

  1. (a)

    The theory of the onto-dynamics of the triunity has three essential elements: (1) triadic, (2) negation, and (3) dynamic. All three elements belong to a cycle, an empty roundness. This is the totality and entirety in the theory of the triunity.

  2. (b)

    “Negation” is non-vertical and non-horizontal, and rejects both the synchronic-epistemological-horizontal understanding and the diachronicontological-vertical understanding of other schools. The non-vertical and non-horizontal is not only a negation of nihilism, however; it also implies a two-fold articulation, because the triunity not only corresponds to non-vertical and non-horizontal negation, but also implies an onto-dynamics of revolving around one another.

  3. (c)

    The two kinds of theory of the triunity in classical Chinese philosophy will be explained. The theory of the triunity has two trends: (1) an epistemological triunity (earth, heaven, humanity), and (2) an ontological triunity (t’ai-chi, yin, yang). These two trends also develop further in later Chinese Buddhism.

  4. (d)

    Chih-i’s (538-97) theory of the triunity implies a new opportunity for inter-religious dialogue in global thought, the conversation of religions, and an inter-cultural philosophy, because (1) the triunity and the themes related to it are also core concepts of Western theology and philosophy, and (2) the theory of the triunity presupposes a methodology of the pluralism of the theology of religion.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. In his theory of the onto-dynamics of the dialectical-triadic understanding of reality in an “East-Asian, horizontal-pragmatic manner,” and above all in East-Asian Buddhism, Heinrich Beck explains a “distant analogy (or aboriginal disposition?) towards the Christian enigma of trinity” and develops an inter-cultural philosophy of inter-religious dialogue for the Western and East-Asian religions. Cf. Heinrich Beck, “World Peace as Dynamic Unity of Cultural Contrarieties: The Onto-Hermeneutic Basis for an Understanding of the Structure of the Culture of Mankind as a Perspective for a `dialectic-Triadic’ Conception of Reality”, in Creative Peace through Encounter of World Cultures,pp. 19–68, ed. Heinrich Beck and Gisela Schmirber (Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Heinrich Beck, “Europa-Afrika-Asien: Komplementarität der Weltkulturen,” in Ganzheitliches Denken: Festschrift für Arnulf Rieber zum 60. Geburtstag,ed. Erwin Schadel (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1996), p. 80: “Hegel’s dialectical view of reality is influenced above all by the three-hypostases theory of neo-Platonism. Here the second member of the triunity-model is the Hegelian `antithesis,’ in our view of the `standing opposite’ — already clearly characterized as `consciousness’ or `reason’; so, for example, with Plotinuschrw(133). According to East-Asian philosophical tradition the entirety of being lives in the complementary contrariety of the forces (or movement-trends) yang and yin, which can also be interpreted in the sense of triadic circular motion.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. The T’ien-t’ai School (Chin. lit.: School of the Heavenly Platform); a school of Buddhism that was given its final form by Chih-I (538–97).

    Google Scholar 

  4. One can say, therefore, that Nâgârjuna’s philosophy not only rejects by negative dialectic all opinion as prapanca (Chap. XVIII, 5 to prapancâtprapancastu günyatâyam nirudhyte),but also acknowledges a positive role for the “dependent skillfulness of the means” (prajnaptir-upâdâya). Nâgârjuna formulates that in his reply to his opponent[s] as follows (XXIV, 7–10): “Based on the Two Truths, on the earthly, limited truth and on the highest truth, the Buddhas proclaim the teachingchrw(133). Based on the truth valid in practical life (vyavahâra),the highest truth (paramârtha) is taught. Without the highest truth, nirvana is not attained.”

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chih-i, Mo-ho chih-kuan,Taissho Vol. 46, p. 7; English Translation, see Neal Donner and Daniel B. Stevenson, The Great Calming and Contemplation: A Study and Annotated Translation of the First Chapter of Chih-i’s Mo-ho chih-kuan (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1993), p. 178 (7b12).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Taisho 46, p. 2. Here we use our new English translation. Stevenson’s Translation see p. 138 in Great Calming and Contemplation: A Study and Annotated Translation of the First Chapter of Chih-i’s Mo-ho chih-kuan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michael von Brück and Whalen Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum: Geschichte, Konfrontation, Dialog ( Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 1997 ), p. 628.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Taisho Vol. 46, p. 22. Here we use our new English translation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chih-i says: “One must believe in the non-vertical and the non-horizontal of the three virtues of the great nirvana, which is the same as the three points of the word ”ie“ and the three eyes of the Isvaradeva. One must believe in the non-vertical and the non-horizontal of the three concentrations and the three views. See Taisho Vol. 46, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chih-i says: “On the basis of the Three Truths we can explain the reason that is clarified by the Four Teachingschrw(133). The name of the Three Truths comes from Inro Sutra and Renwan Sutra.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erich Frauwallner, Die Philosophie des Buddhismus, 4th Ed. ( Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1994 ), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chih-i, The Meanings of the Four Teachings,Taisho Vol. 46, p. 728.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nâgârjuna formulates that in his response to his opponent(s) as follows (MMK, XXIV, 710): “On the basis of the Two Truths, the Buddhas proclaim the theory, on worldly, limited truth and on the highest truthchrw(133). On the basis of the truth valid in practical life (vyavahâra) the highest truth (paramârtha) is taught. Without the highest truth, nirvana is not attained.”

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chih-i, Four Places to Meditate,in Taisho 46, here chapter 4, p. 580.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Ten Stages Sutra is one part of the Hwa-yen Sutra (Buddhâvatamsaka-sûtra, The Garland Stitt - a,Japanese Kegon-kyo).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Mahayanasamgrahasâstra,which was translated by Paramartha, is one of the more important treatises of the Only-Consciousness Philosophy in China before Hsüang-tsang.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan) Chapter 5, here see Taisho Vol. 46, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan) Chapter 5, here see Taisho Vol. 46, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 5, here see Taisho VoI. 46, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 1, here see Taisho Vol. 46, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 1, here see Taisho p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 3, here see Taisho 46, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toshihiko Izutsu, Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism ( Tehran: Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy, 1977 ), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 1, here see Taisho Vol. 46, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 1, here see Taisho Vol. 46, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chih-i, The Great Calming and Contemplation (Mo-ho chih-kuan),Chapter 5, here see Taisho Vol. 46, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jan Jakob Maria de Groot, Universismus: Die Grundlage der Religion und Ethik, des Staatswesens und der Wissenschaften Chinas ( Berlin: G. Reimer, 1918 ).

    Google Scholar 

  28. de Groot, Universismus,pp. 6, 9, 22–55.

    Google Scholar 

  29. de Groot, Universismus,pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li Gi: Das Buch der Riten, Sitten und Bräuche,trans. and ed. Richard Wilhelm, 2nd Ed. (Munich: Eugen Diederichs Verlag, 1994), pp. 64–65 (Li yün, paras. 24, 26).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lexikon der östlichen Weisheitslehren: Buddhismus, Hinduismus, Taoismus, 4th. Ed. ( Bern, Munich, Vienna: O. Barth, 1997 ), p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li Gi: Das Buch der Riten, Sitten und Bräuche, pp. 64–65 (Li yün, paras. 24, 26 ).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Helmuth von Glasenapp, Die fünf Weltreligionen: Hinduismus, Buddhismus, chinesischer Universismus, Christentum, Islam(Munich: Eugen Diederichs Verlag, 1963), pp. 127–28 (1996 paperback edition, p. 144).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Das Buch der Sitte des älteren und jüngeren Dai,trans. and ed. Richard Wilhelm (Jena: Eugen Diederichs Verlag, 1930), p. 374.

    Google Scholar 

  35. von Glasenapp, Die fünf Weltreligionen,p. 128 (1996. paperback edition, p. 145).

    Google Scholar 

  36. von Glasenapp, Die fünf Weltreligionen,p. 129 (1996 paperback edition, pp. 145–46).

    Google Scholar 

  37. von Glasenapp, Die fünf Weltreligionen,p. 129 (1996 paperback edition, p. 146).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching,trans. Ellen M. Chen (New York: Paragon House, 1989), para. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching,para. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching,para. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching,paras. 42, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching,para. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  43. von Glasenapp, Die fünf Weltreligionen,p. 167 (1996 paperback edition, p. 191).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching,para. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  45. von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum,p. 633.

    Google Scholar 

  46. von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum,p. 624.

    Google Scholar 

  47. von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum,p. 628.

    Google Scholar 

  48. von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum,p. 629.

    Google Scholar 

  49. von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum,p. 624.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mircea Eliade, Patterns in Comparative Religion,trans. Rosemary Sheed (London: Sheed and Ward, 1958), pp. 388–409 and other works of Eliade.

    Google Scholar 

  51. von Glasenapp, Die flint’ Weltreligionen,p. 177 (1996 paperback edition, p. 203).

    Google Scholar 

  52. von Glasenapp, Die fünf Weltreligionen,p. 182 (1996 paperback edition, p. 209).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Heinrich Beck, “World Peace as Dynamic Unity of Cultural Contrarieties”, in Creative Peace through Encounter of World Cultures,here see pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gadjin M. Nagao, Mädhyamika and Yogäcära: A Study of Mahayana Philosophies,trans. and ed. L. S. Kawamura (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991), p. 54: “In later Chinese Buddhism, however, one encounters the saying, Truly empty (hence) unfathomable existence,’ which is to be understood as the identity of non-being and being, negation and affirmation, or as the recovery of existence from nonexistence.”

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lai Shen-chon, Buddhist Hermeneutics (in Chinese), (Taiwan: Fo Guang University Publishing Center, 2002 ), Part II.

    Google Scholar 

  56. von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum, p. 625: “In T’ien-t’ai (Japanese: tendai) the triadic schema (Chinese: san-i, literally: ”three-one“) is found in different contextschrw(133). Also for Christian theology, the Trinity is fundamental as the starting point for non-dualistic structures of thought.” The circular dynamic of the triad in T’ien-t’ai Buddhism and Trinity in Christianity, see also Johannes Laube Dialektik der absoluten Vermittlung (Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder, 1984), pp. 124–142, 224.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum, pp. 450–61. See also John B. Cobb and Christopher Ives, ed., The Emptying God: A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian Conversation (Mary-knoll, New York: Orbis, 1990); Christopher Ives ed. Divine Emptiness and Historical Fullness: A Buddhist Jewish Christian Conversation with Masao Abe (Valley Forge, Penn.: Trinity Press International, 1995), I: Kenotic God and Dynamic Sunyata (Masao Abe).

    Google Scholar 

  58. See von Brück and Lai, Buddhismus und Christentum,pp. 468–72. On “the way there” (oso) and “the way back” (gensb),see Johannes Laube, Dialektik der absoluten Vermittlung,pp. 156–57; on metanoia,see pp. 162, 190, 248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Shen-chon Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hannover Institute of Philosophical Research, Hannover, Germany

    Peter Koslowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lai, Sc. (2003). The Speculative Philosophy of the Triunity in Chinese Universism (TAOISM) and Buddhism. In: Koslowski, P. (eds) Philosophy Bridging the World Religions. A Discourse of the World Religions, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2618-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2618-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6029-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2618-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation