Abstract
The purpose of these pages is to sketch the outline of an extended argument which links the various studies that make up this book. Ultimately, I wish to claim that there is a fundamental asymmetry between life and death — of, if you wish, between being and not being — which endows life’s world with a moral orientation not reducible to the preference and/or the consensus of individual subjects. Contrary to the claims of radical scepticism, ancient and modern, I believe this asymmetry and this moral orientation enable us to claim that at least some of our assertions can be non-trivially true, independently of our assent. Or, in another idiom, I wish to claim that what is said can be true or false — and that what is done can be right or wrong — because, prior to our reflection, something is good, something is bad, and something is evil. Scepticism, I believe, is ultimately false because this is a value indexed, not a value neutral cosmos.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kohák, E. (1998). The True and the Good: Reflections on the Primacy of Practical Reason. In: Cohen, R.S., Tauber, A.I. (eds) Philosophies of Nature: The Human Dimension. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 195. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2614-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2614-6_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4859-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2614-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive