Abstract
The word nature is ambiguous and has undergone various shifts in meaning during its long history. Perhaps the most important of these shifts is that which distinguishes the predominantly classical sense of phusis or natura as divine from the typical modern conception of nature as res extenso or in other words as extension or body in contrast with mind, soul, or spirit. In all epochs going back to classical antiquity, nature has been defined by way of contrast with or opposition to an antonym. The most important of which I am aware are nomos or custom, techne or art, soul, intellect, spirit and history. Each of these antonyms is itself ambiguous and admits of various senses. On the whole, however, it does seem possible to detect a common theme in the diverse understandings of the term “nature.” To borrow an expression from Aristotle, nature is that which happens always or for the most part. This is so whether we think of nature as divine or lifeless. Custom, art, and history are all changing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosen, S. (1998). Remarks on Human Nature in Plato. In: Cohen, R.S., Tauber, A.I. (eds) Philosophies of Nature: The Human Dimension. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 195. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2614-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2614-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4859-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2614-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive