Advertisement

Evaluation and Testing in Creativity

  • Ingar Brinck
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 320)

Abstract

The cognitive aspects of creativity pertain to modes of thinking and processes of the mind. More thoughts and actions than one at first would think are creative, not only within the fields of science and art, but also in everyday life. Household work like cleaning or cooking sometimes stand in need of creative thinking, as does engaging in science and technology, for instance, by constructing theories to explain observations, or designing new experiments. Only, unless actions are of a historical importance, they rarely receive much attention, not even from the person that stands behind them.

Keywords

Conceptual Change Creative Process Creative Thinking Green House Effect Receive View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. and Prinz, J. J. (1997). Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., and Vaid, J., editors, Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Brinck, I. (1997). The gist of creativity. In Andersson, A. and Sahlin, N.-E., editors, The Complexity of Creativity. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Brinck, I. (1999a). Non-conceptual content and the distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5): 760–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinck, I. (1999b). Procedures and strategies: context-dependence in creativity. Philosophica, 64 (2): 33–47.Google Scholar
  5. Brinck, I. (2000). From intuition to insight. In Sandström, S., editor, The Intuitive Formation of Meaning, Conference no. 48. Royal Academy of Letters, History, and Antiquities, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: how language augments human computation. In Carruthers, P. and Boucher, J., editors, Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. InGoogle Scholar
  8. Glover, G., Ronning, R., and Reynolds, C., editors, Handbook of Creativity: Assessment, Theory, and Research. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Dasgupta, S. (1996). Technology and Creativity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Dienes, Z. and Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5): 735–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Duque, D. and Johnson, M. (1999). Attention metaphors: how metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science, 23 (1): 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Gedenryd, H. (1998). How Designers Work. Lund University Cognitive Studies, Lund.Google Scholar
  13. Holyoak, K. and Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  15. Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: why we use our hands when we think. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Nersessian, N. (1984). Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Nersessian, N. (1995). Should physicists preach what they practice? Science and Education, 4: 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nersessian, N. (2001). Conceptual change: creativity, cognition, and culture. In Meheus, J., editor, Creativity and Scientific Discovery. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  19. Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  20. Perkins, D. N. (1988). The possibility of invention. In Sternberg, R. J., editor, The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, G. and Carlsson, I. (1990). The Creative Process: A Functional Model Based on Empirical Studies from Early Childhood to Middle Age. International Issues Press, Inc., Madison, Connecticut.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingar Brinck
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations