Skip to main content

Inquiry into the I, disclosedness, and self-consciousness: Husserl, Heidegger, Nishida

  • Chapter
Phenomenology in Japan

Abstract

Consciousness — Bewußtsein — was one of the key concepts of Husserl’s phenomenology. In contrast to this, Heidegger — regarded as Husserl’s most outstanding pupil — placed Dasein at the center of his own phenomenology. This change in key concepts may be seen as an upheaval in the phenomenology that purports to study the “things themselves”: as a shift of focus from the activity of a Bewußtsein that constitutes the Being of objects, to the passivity of a Dasein that receives the donation of Being. But there is another aspect of Dasein that lies in the concept of “Da” (disclosedness), and it implies another possibility for the development of phenomenology that Heidegger did not fully develop. Kitaro Nishida, the Japanese philosopher who introduced phenomenology to Japan during the first half of the 20th century, developed this concept in his own way by analyzing the structure of disclosedness in terms of self-consciousness. In this paper I will follow the development of phenomenology from the “I” of Husserl, through Heidegger’s concept of “disclosedness,” to “self-consciousness” as it is understood by Nishida.

... seeing the shape of the shapeless, hearing the voice of the voiceless ...

Kitaro Nishida (IV, p. 6)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Franz Brentano, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt,Volume 1, p. 125f.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brentano: Ibid.,p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ms. M 1113, p. 2, cit. from Alwin Diemer, Edmund Husserl - Versuch einer systematischen Darstellung seiner Philosophie, 2. verbesserte Auflage, Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain 1965, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ms. C 17 IV p. 6 [1932], cit. from Klaus Held, Lebendige Gegenwart, The Hague: Marti-nus Nijhoff, 1966, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iso Kern, “Object, Objective Phenomenon and Objectivating Act according to the `Vijnaptimatratasiddhi’ of Xuanzang” (600 — 664).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ms. A V 5, p. 5 [1933], cit. from Held: Ibid. p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit,Tübingen: Max Niemeyer 1977, pp. 132 — 133.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heidegger is critical of all active operations of consciousness which constitute the Object and its Being thematically. Concepts such as “Sorge, which operate athematically and in a non-object-oriented manner, are closely related to this aspect of his critique. But such concepts seem to me to be secondary in his critique of Husserl. The primary target of criticism is Husserl’s idea of the constitution of Being.

    Google Scholar 

  9. To this end, he considers not only the matter of “Geschick” in the problematics of historicality, but also the ancient Greek concept of physis that reigns over all movement.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ms. A V 5 p. 2, cit. from Held: Ibid. p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Yorihiro Yamagata, “The Philosophy of Nishida and French Philosophy” in NishidaTetsugaku wo manabu Hito no tameni, Sekaishiso-sha, 1996, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Résumé de cours, Paris: Gallimard 1968, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Le visible et l’invisible, Paris: Gallimard 1964, p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merleau-Ponty, La nature, Paris: Edition de Seuil 1995, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Their “dialectical” path as a way of recovering the original situation contains another problem: it does not encounter the radical Other — a problem I cannot investigate within the scope of this paper.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lao-tze: 5th Stanza.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tani, T. (1998). Inquiry into the I, disclosedness, and self-consciousness: Husserl, Heidegger, Nishida. In: Steinbock, A.J. (eds) Phenomenology in Japan. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2602-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2602-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5118-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2602-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics