Skip to main content

Abstract

Much has been said and written about what the public expects from science: resolving, or at least reducing, uncertainty. Scientists are requested to give definite answers to societal questions. There are simple and one-dimensional questions that can be unambiguously answered by science, such as effects of smoking on lung functions. However, the majority of urgent societal questions pertain to complex issues, such as increasing poverty, climate change and European integration. Such complex issues involve inherent uncertainty. Scientists are, for example, unable to give confident answers about the magnitude of global climate change or even whether a region will warm or cool. Uncertainty thus has major political and ethical impacts, as the need to decide whether or not to act, as well as what kind of action to take, requires deciding about uncertainty2.

A condensed version of this Chapter has been submitted to Risk Analysis and is also available in the format of an ICIS working paper. (van Asselt 1999)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Chapter 3A

  • Achterhuis, H. (1998). The legacy of the utopia (in Dutch), Ambo, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J., and Bartnicki, J. (1987). “A Framework for Error Analysis ofa Long-range Transport Model with Emphasis on Parameter Uncertainty.” Atmospheric Environment, 21 (10), 2121–2131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankes, S. (1994). “Computational Experiments and Exploratory Modeling.” CHANCE, 7 (1), 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., and Shapin, S. (1979). Natural Order: Historical studies of scientific culture, Sage, Beverly Hills, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, J. (1993). The history of the subject, Descartes, Spinoza, Kant (in Dutch), Agora, Kampen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, T. (1763). “An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrines of Chances.” Phil. Trans., 53, 370–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M. B. (1987). “Water Quality Modelling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resources Research, 23 (8), 1393–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1986). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1997). “Fatalists in the labyrinth of the risk society.” The World as Risk Society: Essays about the ecologi- cal crisis and the politics of progress (in Dutch), U. Beck, ed., De Balie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, G., Parston, G., and Rosen head, J. (1986). “Robustness in Practice: The regional planning of health services.” J. Op! Res. Soc., 37, 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B., Robinson, J. B., Tague, C., and Walsh, M. (1998). “Tools for Linking Choices and Consequences.” Sustain-ability Issues and Choices in the Lower Fraser Basin: Resolving the Dissonance, M. Healey, ed., UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bithas, K, and Nijkamp, P. (1996). “Environmental Impact Assessment under Scientific and Informational Uncertainty.” T196–94/5, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boritz, J. E. (1990). “Approaches to Dealing with Risk and Uncertainty.”, The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, R., Filar, J., Rotmans, J., and Elzen, M. G. J. d. (1994). “The IMAGE Greenhouse Model as a Mathematical System.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 18 (May), 234–254.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bressers, H., and Hoppe, R. (1998). “Strategies for the Management of Inherent Uncertainty in Sustainable Development: Links between the cognitive and political structure of uncertainty and risk.”, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplin, D. A., and Kombluth, J. S. H. (1975). “Multiple Investment Planning under Uncertainty.” Omega, 3, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colglazier, E. W. (1991). “Scientific Uncertainties, Public Policy and Global Warming. How Sure is Sure Enough?” Policy Studies Journal, 19 (2), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge, D. (1980). The Social Control of Technology, Frances Printer, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Farber, S., and Maxwell, J. (1989). “The Valuation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems.” Ecological Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coward, H., and Hurka,T. (1993). “Ethics and Climate Change: The greenhouse effect.”, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombag, H., and van Dun, F. (1997). The Utopian Temptation (in Dutch), Contact, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1983). “Rational Expectations: A fallacious foundation for studying crucial decision-making processes.” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 5, 182–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen, M. (1994). “GLobal Environmental Change: An integrated modelling approach”, International Books, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Geus, M. (1996). Ecological Utopias: Ecotopias and the environmental debate (in Dutch), Jan van Arkel, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Marchi, B. (1995). “Uncertainty in Environmental Emergencies: A diagnostic tool.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 3 (2), 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Marchi, B., Funtowicz, 5.0., and Ravetz, J. R. (1993). “The Management of Uncertainty in the Communication of Major Hazards.” CEC JRC EUR 15268 EN, CEC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, H. J. M. (1989). “Sustainable resource use: An inquiry into modelling and planning,”, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen, M. G.J., Beusen, A. H. W., Rotmans, J., and van Asselt, M. B. A. (1997). “Human disturbance of the global biogeochemical cycles.” Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS approach, J. Rotmans and B. de Vries, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotto, L. (1993). Ethical choices and global greenhouse warming, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1969). “Environments at risk.” Ecology: The Shaping Enquiry, J. Beuthall, ed., Longman, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1982). “Essays in the Sociology of Perception.”, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., and Wildaysky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: Essays on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers, University of California Press, Berkley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. R., and Handmer, J. W. (1992). “Uncertainty, Sustainability and Change.” Global Environmental Change, December, 262–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowlatabadi, H., and Morgan, M. G. (1993). “Integrated Assessment of Climate Change.” Science, 259, 1813–1814.

    Google Scholar 

  • EnvironmentalResources. (1985). “Handling Uncertainty in Environmental Impact Assessment.”, Environmental Resources Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Resources. (1987). “Risky Decisions: A management strategy.”, Environmental Resources, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermoliev, Y. M. (1993). “Uncertainties and Decision Making.” WP-93–22, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S., and Costanza, R. (1987). “The Economic Value of Wetland Systems.” Journal of Environmental Management, 24, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedra, K. (1983). “Environmental Modeling under Uncertainty: Monte Carlo Simulation.”, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. (1989). “The Strategic Choice Approach.” Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, J. Rosenhead, ed., John Wiley Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J., and Hickling, A. (1987). Planning under Pressure,,Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz,). R. (1989). “Managing Uncertainty in Policy-related Research.” Les experts sont formels: Controverse scientifques et Decisions Politiques dans le domaine de l’environment, Arc-et-Senans, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz, J. R. (1990). Uncertainty and quality in science for policy, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz, J. R. (1993a). “The Emergence of Post-normal Science.” Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific uncertainty and decision-making, R. von Schomberg, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz, J. R. (1993b). “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures,25(7), 739–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz, J. R. (1994). “The Worth of a Songbird: Ecological Economics as a Post-Normal Science.” Ecological Economics(10), 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (1996). “The Miraculous Comeback of Uncertainty and the End of Modernity.”, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grendstad, G., and Selle, R (1997). “Cultural Theory, Postmaterialism and Environmental Attitudes.” Culture Matters: Essays in Memory of Aaron Wildaysky, R. J. Ellis and M. Thompson, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. K., and Rosen head, J. (1968). “Robustness in Sequential Investment Decisions.” Management Science, 15, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1962). Physics and Philosophy: The revolution in modern science, Harper and Row, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton, J. C. (1994). `Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems.“ Risk analysis, 14 (4), 483–511.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henrion, M., and Fischhoff, B. (1986). “Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants.” Annual Journal of Physics, 54 (9), 791–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. J. (1995). Science and Technology in a Multicultural World: The cultural politics of facts and artifacts, Colombia University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettelingh, J.-P. (1989). “Uncertainty in Modelling Regional Environmental Systems: The generalization of a watershed acidification model for predicting broad scale effects.” RR-90–3, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling, A. (1989). “Gambling with frozen fire?’ Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, J. Rosenhead, ed., John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderink, H. B. M., and van Asselt, M. B. A. (1997). “Population and Health in Perspective.” Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS approach, J. Rotmans and H. J. M. de Vries, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisschemólle, M., and Hoppe, R. (1996). “Coping with Intractable Controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis.” Knowledge and Policy, 8 (4), 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A. Y. (1998). Perspectives on Water: An integrated model-based exploration of the future, International Books, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A. Y., Beusen, A. H. W., Hilderink, H. B. M., and van Asselt, M. B. A. (1997). “Water in crisis?’ Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS approach, J. Rotmans and H. J. M. de Vries, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, F. O., and Hammonds, J. 5. (1994). “Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessment: The need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability.” Risk Analysis, 14 (5), 707–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerwerf, A. (1989). “Government policy: An introduction to policy science (in Dutch).”, Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan de Rijn, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R., and Peterse, A. (1998). “Building stones for argumentative policy analysis (in Dutch).”, Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iman, R. L., Helton, J. C., and Campbell, J. E. (1981). “An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models.” Journal of Quality Technology,13(3), 174–183, 232–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C. C., Chadwick, M., Wynne, B., Funtowicz, S., Giaoutzi, M., Giner, S., Toth, F., Jäger, J., Dürrenberger, G., Ravetz,J. R., and Casilli, C. (1995). “ULYSSES - Urban Lifestyles, Sustainability and Integrated Environmental Assessment - RTD proposal for the European Community Framework Programme IV.”, Darmstadt Technical University, Darmstadt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C. C., Grendstad, G., van Asselt, M. B. A., Beck, A., Bieri, L., Dürrenberger, G., Selle, R, and Stromsnes, K. (1999). “Environmental Risks and Myths of Nature: A Test Of The Cultural Theory Of Risk.” Risk Analysis (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jager, W., van Asselt, M. B. A., Rotmans, J., and Vlek, C. (1999). “Consumer Behaviour. A modelling perspective in the context of integrated assessment of global change.” Sustainability in Question: The search for a conceptual framework, J. KShn, J. Gowdy, F. Hinterberger, and). van der Straaten, eds., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jager, W., van Asselt, M. B. A., Rotmans, J., Vlek, C. A. J., and Costerman_Boodt, R. (1997). “Consumer behaviour: A modelling perspective in the context of integrated assessment of global change.” 461502017, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A. (1996). “Meeting Targets,”, Maastrict University, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, P. H. M., Slob, W., and Rotmans, J. (1990). “Uncertainty Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis: An Inventory of Ideas, Methods and Techniques from the Literature.” 958805001, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policy makers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1991). “Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society.” Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management, D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander, eds., Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., and Wynne, B. (1998). “Science and Decision-making.” Human Choice and Climate Change, S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, eds., Battelle Press, Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, H., and Wiener, A. (1967). The Year 2000, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1982). “Variants of uncertainty.” Judgement under Uncertainty: heuristics and biases, D. Kahneman, P. Slvic, and A. Tversky, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kann, A. (1998). “A Comparison of Approaches for Performing Uncertainty Analysis in Integrated Assessment Models.” 14. 4, Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1783). Prolegoma to rational metaphysics (in German), Riga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keepin, B., and Wynne, B. (1984). `Technical Analysis of the IIASA Energy Scenarios.“ Nature, 312, 691–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1937). “Some economic consequences of a declining population.” The Eugenics Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. J. (1996). “Uncertainty Theories, Measures and Principles.” Uncertainty: Models and Measures, H. G. Natke and Y. Ben-Haim, eds., Akademie Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K., and Mulkay, M. (1983). “Science Observed.”, Sage, Beverly Hills, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1957). Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, nm, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1991). Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times, Bsil Blackwell, Oxford, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The social construction of scientific facts, Sage, Beverly Hills, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L B., and Dowlatabadi, H. (1993). “Climate Change:The effects of personal beliefs and scientific uncertainty.” Environmental Science and Technology, 27 (10), 1962–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, M. (1993). “Towards a Fossil Free Energy Future: The next energy transition.”, Stockhom Environment Institute for Greenpeace International, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R. J., Schlesinger, M. E, and Bankes, S. C. (1996). “When We Don’t Know the Costs or the Benefits: Adaptive Strategies for Abating Climate Change.” Climatic Change, 33 (2), 235–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R. J., and Bonomo, J. L. (1998). “New Methods for Robust Science and Technology Planning.” DB-238DARPA, RAND, Santa Monica, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A., and Richels, R. (1995). “The Greenhouse Debate: Economic efficiency, burden sharing and hedging strategies.”, Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1978). “Bounded Rationality: Ambiguity and Engineering of Choice.” Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, C., Langford, I., Saunderson, T., and O’Riordan, T. (1997). “Exploring the Psychometric Paradigm: Comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses.” Risk Analysis, 17(3), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, J. (1955). “Probability in the Social Sciences.” Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences, P. F. Lazarsfeldt, ed., Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. M., and Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty - A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., and Keith, D. W. (1995). “Subjective Judgements by Climate Experts.” Environmental Science and Technology, 29 (10), 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natke, H. G., and Ben-Haim, Y. (1996). “Uncertainty: a discussion from various points of view.” Uncertainty: Models and measures, H. G. Natke and Y. Ben-Haim, eds., Akademie Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niessen, L. W., and Hilderink, H. (1997). “The Population and Health Submodel.” Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS approach, J. Rotmans and B. de Vries, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). “Expert Opinion on Climate Change.” American Scientist, 82, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. (1987). “Concepts of Science for policy.” Science, Politics and Morality; Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making, R. Von Schomberg, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. (1993). “A New Branch of Science, Inc.” Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific uncertainty and decision-making, R. von Schomberg, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V. “Error analysis of ecological models.” Third National Symposium on Radioecology,Oak Ridge, USA, 898–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V., and Gardner, R. H. (1979). “Sources of Uncertainty in Ecological Models.” Methodology in Systems Modelling and Simulation, B. P. Zeigler, M. S. Elzas, G. J. Klir, and T. I. Oren, eds., North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K. (1994). “Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences.” Science, 263 (February), 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T., and Jordan, A. (1999). “Institutions, Climate Change and Cultural Theory: Towards a common analytical framework.” Global Environmental Change, 9, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T., Marris, C., and Langford, I. (1997). “Images of Science Underlying Public Perceptions of Risk.”, R. Society, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., Jaeger, C. C., Rayner, S., Schaer, C., van Asselt, M. B. A., Imboden, D., and Vckovski, A. (1998). “Regional Integrated Assessment and the Problem of Indeterminacy.” Views from the Alps: Regional Perspectives on Climate Change, P. Cebon, U. Dahinden, H. C. Davies, D. Imboden, and C. C. Jaeger, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, E. A. (1996). “Three Dilemmas in the Integrated Assessment of Climate Change.” Climatic Change(34), 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergraft, C. A. (1998). “Human Dimensions of Climate Change: Cultural Theory and collective action.” Climatic Change, 39, 643–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1992). “Science as Practise and Culture.”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, J. D. (1998). `The Meaning of Global Environmental Change: Re-theorizing culture in human dimensions research.“ Global Environmental Change, 8 (3), 227–248.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. (1984). “Disagreeing about Risk: The Institutional Cultures of Risk Management and Planning for Future Generations.” Risk Analysis, Institution and Public Policy, S. G. Hadden, ed., Associated Faculty Press, Port Washington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. (1991). “A Cultural Perspective on the Structure and Implementation of Global Environmental Agreements.” Evaluation Review, 15 (1), 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. (1992). “Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis.” Social Theory of Risk, G. D. Preagor, ed., Westport, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. F. (1987). “Risk and relativism in science for policy.” The social and cultural construction of risk, B. B. Johnson and V. T. Covello, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risbey, J., Kandlikar, M., and Patwardhan, A. (1996). “Assessing Integrated Assessments.” Climatic Change(34), 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson,). B. (1991). “Modelling the interactions between human and natural systems.” International Science Journal(130), 629–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. (1998). Taking Complexity Seriously: A Policy Analysis, Triangulation and Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohen, Y. (1988). Uncertainty Analysis, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, T., and Schneider, S. (1995). “Ecology and Climate: Research strategies and implications.” Science, 269 (52), 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights,inroads, and intrusions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1989). “Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict.”, John Wiley Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D., Robinson, J., and Biggs, D. (1998 (in press)). “Signs of Life Linking Indicators and Models in the Context of QUEST.” Ecological Economics and Integrated Assessment: A participatory process for including equity, efficiency and scale in decision-making for sustainability, R. Costanza and S. Tognetti, eds., SCOPE, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J. (1998a). “Integrated thinking and acting: a necessary good (in Dutch).”, ICIS, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J. (1998b). “Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead.” Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3(3, Special issue: Challenges and Opportunities for Integrated Environmental Assessment, J. Rotmans and P. Vellinga, eds. ), 155–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., and de Vries, H. J. M. (1997). “Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS approach.”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., and van Asselt, M. B. A. (1999). “Perspectives on a Sustainable Future.” International Journal for Sustainable Development, 1 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., and van Asselt, M. B. A. (2000 (in press)). “Integrated Assessment: Current Practises and Challenges for the Future.” Ecological Economics and Integrated Assessment: A participatory process for including equity, efficiency and scale in decision-making for sustainability, R. Constanza and S. Tognetti, eds., SCOPE, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A, de Bruin, A. J., den Elzen, M. G. J., de Greef, J., Hilderink, H., Hoekstra, A. Y., Janssen, M. A., Koster, H. W., Martens, W.J. M., Niessen, L. W., and de Vries, H. J. M. (1994). “Global Change and Sustainable Development: A Modelling Perspective for the Next Decade.” RIVM-report no. 461502004, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W. D. (1994). “Understanding Uncertainty.” Risk analysis, 14(5), 743–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1987). “Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change. An advocacy coalition framework.” Knowledge: creation, diffusion, utilization, 8 (4), 649–692.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1962). “Bayesian Statistics.” Recent Developments in Information and Decision Processes, Macho! and Gray, eds., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, R. W. (1983). “Decision-making under Uncertainty.”, Elsevier scientific publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M., and Thompson, M. (1990). Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1955). Uncertainty in Economics and Other Reflections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, S., and Wynne, B. (1995). “Integrati ng Knowledges for Climate Change: Pyramids, Nets and Uncertainties.” Global Environmental Change, 5 (2), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbergeld, E. K. (1991). “Risk Assessment and Risk Management: An uneasy divorce.” Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander, eds, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. L. (1980). “Resources, Population, Environment: An Oversupply of False Bad News.” Science, 208, 1431–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. L. (1981). “Against the Doomsdayers.” The Ultimate Resource, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildaysky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Boulder, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1980). “Causal Schemes in Judgements under Uncertainty.” Progress in Social Psychology, M. Fishbein, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science, 211, 453–458.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1993). “World Population Prospects: The 1992 revision.” ST/ESA/SER.A/135, United Nations, Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1995). “World Population Prospects: The 1994 revision.”, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A. (1997). “TARGETS for ULYSSES: Work package.”, EAWAG, Dubendorf, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A. (1999). “Uncertainty in Decision Support: From problem to challenge.” Risk Analysis (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., Beusen, A. H. W., and Hilderink, H. B. M. (1996). “Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment: A Social Scientific Approach.” Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 1 (1/2), 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., and Rotmans, J. (1995). “Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling: A Cultural Perspective-based Approach.” RIVM-report no. 461502009, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands, Bilthoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., and Rotmans, J. (1996). “Uncertainty in Perspective.” Global Environmental Change, 6 (2), 121–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., and Rotmans, J. (1997). “Uncertainties in perspective.” Perspectives on Global Change: the TARGETS approach, J. Rotmans and B. de Vries, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., and Rotmans, J. (1999). “Perspectives and the subjective dimension in modelling.” Climate Change: an integrated perspective, D. Janssen, W. J. M. Martens, J. Rotmans, and O. J. Vrieze, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., Storms, C. A. H. M., Rijkens-Klomp, N., and Rotmans, J. (1998). “Towards Visions for a Sustainable Europe: An overview and assessment of the last decade of European scenario studies.” 198-E001, ICIS, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Graaf, R. (1985). “Strategic Choice in LPG policy.” Evaluation of Complex Policy Problems, A. Faludi and H. Voogd, eds., Delftsche Uitgevers, Delft, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Sluijs, J., and Schulte Fischedick, K. (1997). “Dealing with Uncertainty in Science for Environmental Policy: An inventory of theories and approaches (in Dutch).” 97017, University of Utrecht and the Rathenau Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Sluijs, J. P. (1997). “Anchoring amid uncertainty,”, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eeten, M. (1999). Dialogues of the Deaf Defining New Agendas for Environmental Deadlocks, Eburon, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vlimmeren, J. C. G., Don, F. J. H., and Okker, V. R. (1991). “Composition and pattern of forecast uncertainty due to unreliable data: further results.” 81, Central Planning Bureau, The Hague, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Witteloostuijn, A. (1986). “Choice-theory versus Behaviourism: A paradox.” 187, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Witteloostuijn, A. (1987). “Uncertainty in Psychology: A look beyond the non-differentiated approach.” RM 87–020, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesely, W. E., and Rasmuson, D. M. (1984). “Uncertainties in Nuclear Probabilistic Risk Analyses.” Risk Analysis, 4, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schomberg, R. (1993). “Controversies and Political Decision Making” Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific uncertainty and decision-making, R. von Schomberg, ed., Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten,T. S. (1990). “Measuring Vague Uncertainties and Understanding their Use in Decision Making.” Acting under uncertainty: Multidisciplinary conception, G. M. von Furstenberg, ed., Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A. M. (1972). “Science and Trans-Science.” Minerva, 10, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A. M. (1973). “Letter to Science.” Science, 180, 1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsemius, P. (1986). Guest at Home: Views on environmental management (in Dutch), Samson Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan de Rijn, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • WorldBank. (1993). World Development Report 1993 Investing in Health, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR. (1994). Sustained Risks: A Lasting Phenomenon, SDU Uitgeverij, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1992). “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm.” Global Environmental Change, 2 (June), 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. J. (1996). “Uncertainty Modelling and Fuzzy Sets.” Uncertainty: Models and Measures, H. G. Natke and Y. Ben-Haim, eds., Akademie Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Asselt, M.B.A. (2000). Uncertainty. In: Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2583-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2583-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5597-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2583-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics