Advertisement

The Good of Health: An Argument for an Objectivist Understanding

  • Patricia Donohue-White
  • Kateryna Fedoryka Cuddeback
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 72)

Abstract

In contemporary analyses of the concept of health, it is generally undisputed that health in its primary meaning is a value concept1: health is a good and as such it motivates and regulates types of action. The good of health is further specified as a kind of well-being or as a necessary condition for well-being. The predominant understanding of good in general and well-being in particular is a subjectivist one (Nordenfelt, 1987, pp. 81–82), basing well-being variously in individual feelings of happiness or the satisfaction of desires (desire-satisfaction theory2).

Keywords

Natural Kind Human Person Conscious Experience Natural Norm Feeling State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boorse, C.: 1975, ‘On the distinction between disease and illness,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5 (Fall), 49–68.Google Scholar
  2. Boorse, C.: 1977, ‘Health as a theoretical concept,’ Philosophy of Science, 46, 559.Google Scholar
  3. Brandt, R.: 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Brink, D.: 1989, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butchvarov, P.: 1989, Skepticism in Ethics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  6. Engelhardt, H.T.: 1976, ‘Ideology and etiology,’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1 (3), 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engelhardt, H.T.: 1981, ‘The concepts of health and disease,’ in A. Caplan, H. T. Engelhardt, and J. McCartney (eds.), Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
  8. Greene, M.: 1978, ‘Individuals and their kind: Aristotelian foundations of biology,’ in S. Spicker (ed.), Organism, Medicine, and Metaphysics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hildebrand, D.V.: 1953, Ethics, Franciscan Herald Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Hildebrand, D.V.: 1980, Moralia, Verlag Josef Habbel, Regensburg.Google Scholar
  11. Hildebrand, D.V.: 1991, What is Philosophy? Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  12. Kraut, R.: 1979, ‘Two conceptions of happiness,’ Philosophical Review, 88 (2), 167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kass, L.: 1985, Toward a More Natural Science, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Mounier, E.: 1952, Personalism, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame and London.Google Scholar
  15. Nordenfeldt, L.: 1987, On the Nature of Health, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Nordenfeldt, L.: 1993a, ‘Concepts of health and their consequences for health care,’ Theoretical Medicine, 14 (4).Google Scholar
  17. Nordenfeldt, L.: 1993b, Quality of Life, Health and Happiness, Avebury, Aldershot, Singapore, Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Pörn, I.: 1984, ‘An equilibrium model of health,’ in L. Nordenfelt and B. I. B. Lindhal (eds.), Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Railton, P.: 1986, ‘Facts and values,’ Philosophical Topics, 14 (1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosati, C.: 1995, ‘Persons, perspectives, and full information accounts of the good,’ Ethics, 105, 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scheler, M.: 1973, Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Value, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.Google Scholar
  22. Seifert, J.: 1987, Back to Things Themselves, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York and London.Google Scholar
  23. Toulmin, S.: 1975, ‘Concepts of function and mechanism in medicine and medical science,’ in H. T. Englehardt and S. Spicker (eds.), Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
  24. Wallace, J.: 1978, Virtues and Vices, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
  25. Whitbeck, C.: 1981, ‘A theory of health,’ in A. Caplan, H. T. Engelhardt, and J. McCartney (eds.), Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, pp. 611–626.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, G.H.V.: 1993, The Varieties of Goodness, Thoemmes Press, Bristol, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Donohue-White
    • 1
  • Kateryna Fedoryka Cuddeback
    • 1
  1. 1.International Academy of PhilosophyPrincipality of Liechtenstein

Personalised recommendations