Advertisement

Health, Disease, and Persons: Well-Being in a Post-Modern World

  • H. Tristram EngelhardtJr.
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 72)

Abstract

There is no generic human well-being. All actual human well-being has content and is specific. This is the case because well-being is contextual and there are numerous contexts within which human well-being can be defined. This is also the case because well-being must be specified in terms of a particular content-full understanding of values or human flourishing. To talk concretely of well-being is to specify a context and to accent some values over others, to endorse certain notions of appropriate human projects over others. Because there are divergent contexts within which to understand human well-being and because there are diverse accounts, understandings, and rankings of values and of appropriate human projects, a scrutiny of notions of health and disease reveals that they are in the plural.1 There are numerous competing accounts of the good life and of human flourishing. This plurality is reflected in the numerous understandings and construals of health and disease.2 The role of culture-dependent values in these differences is accented when particular understandings of disease and health are incorporated with health-care systems that must inevitably embody decisions as to what states of affairs should be the focus of appropriate medical concern and medical treatment.3 The framing of an all-encompassing societal health care system inevitably discloses tensions among competing accounts of health and disease.

Keywords

Human Nature Human Person Inclusive Fitness Moral Community Moral Vision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. D.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems,de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Boorse, C.: 1975, `On the distinction between disease and illness,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (Fall), 49–68.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, R. D.:1977, `Health as a theoretical concept,’ Philosophy of Science 44 (December), 542–573.Google Scholar
  4. Bums, C. R.: 1975, `Diseases versus healths: Some legacies in the philosophies of modern medical science,’ in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr., and S. F. Spicker (eds.) Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
  5. Clouser, K. D., Culver, C. M. and Gert, B.: 1981, `Malady: A new treatment of disease,’ Hastings Center Report 11 (June), 29–37.Google Scholar
  6. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: 1996, The Foundations of Bioethics 2d ed, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: 1994, `Sittlichkeit and post-modernity: An Hegelian reconsideration of the state,’ in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. and T. Pinkard (eds.), Hegel Reconsidered, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evagrios: 1979, `On prayer’ in The Philokalia, St. Nikodimos of the Holy Mountain and St. Makarios of Corinth (eds.), G. E. H. Palmer, P. Sherrard, and K. Ware (trans.): Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
  9. Fleck, L.: 1935, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, T. J. Trenn (trans.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Goosens, W. K.: 1980, `Values, health, and medicine,’ Philosophy of Science 47 (March), 100115.Google Scholar
  11. Kass, L.: 1985, Toward a More Natural Science: Biology and Human Affairs, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. King, L. S.: 1954, `What is disease?’ Philosophy of Science 21 (July), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maclntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1988, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar
  14. Maclntyre, A.: 1990, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar
  15. Margolis, J.: 1976, `The concept of disease,’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (September), 238–255.Google Scholar
  16. Nordenfelt, L. and Lindahl, B.I.B. (eds.): 1984, Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Nordenfelt, L.: 1995, On the Nature of Health, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Staniloae, D.: 1994, The Experience of God, I. Ionita and R.Barringer (trans.), Holy Cross Orthodox Press, Brookline, Mass.Google Scholar
  19. Symons, D.: 1979, The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, New York. Vlachos, H.: 1994, Orthodox Psychotherapy (The Science of the Fathers), E. Williams (trans.), Birth of the Theotokos Monastery, Levadia, Greece.Google Scholar
  20. Vogel, C.: 1989, Vom Töten zum Mord, Carl Hanser, Munich.Google Scholar
  21. Wright, G. H.v.: 1963, The Varieties of Goodness, Humanities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Wulff, H.: 1981, Rational Diagnosis and Treatment, 2d ed, Blackwell Scientific, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Tristram EngelhardtJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Rice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations