Skip to main content

Neither Satan nor Santa

Shell, Competitive Advantage and Stakeholders in the Peruvian Amazon

  • Chapter
  • 188 Accesses

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 8))

Abstract

When Royal Dutch Shell (hereafter ‘Shell’) re-entered the remote Camisea region of Peru to again plan for the development of a large natural gas field in the area, anticipated effects of the company’s activities on local indigenous communities ranged from bringing the evil of destruction and disease to providing prosperity through direct cash compensatory gifts (May et al., 1999a). In fact, in a major break from its past standard operating procedure, the company adopted an unorthodox approach that incorporated extensive stakeholder participation to proactively identify and mitigate the environmental and social impacts of its activities and create net benefits to affected communities without providing direct cash payments. Ultimately, Shell was neither Satan nor Santa, but instead, as will be shown, it was a highly competitive company responding pragmatically to external public pressures and concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1974) The Limits of Organisation. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G., G.R. Smith, F.J. Vacas, E.K. Swingholm, R.M. Yuill, M.A. Aleman (1997) Managing non-technical risks associated with seismic operations in the tropical rainforests of Ecuador. Oil & Gas Journal Special Issue,50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernicke, J., G. Dowell, S. Hart, A. Sastry (1997) Corporate Environmental Reputation: Asset or Albatross? Paper presented at the Corporate Reputation, Image, and Competitiveness conference. January, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., K. Cool (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., G. Hamel, C.K. Prahalad (1989) Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, J., K. Tangen, H.O. Bergesen (1997) Environmental Challenges Confronting the Oil Industry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., M. Shanley (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2): 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. (1996) Reputation: Realizing its Value from Corporate Image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman. Grant, R.M. (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33: 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolin, J. (1998) Corporate legitimacy in risk society: the case of Brent Spar. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7: 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1993) A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20: 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C., E. Stafford (1998) Crafting enviropreneurial value chain strategies through green alliances. Business Horizons March-April, 41: 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, M. (1999) A new operational paradigm for oil operations in sensitive environments: an analysis of social pressure, corporate capabilities and competitive advantage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8: 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Finance Corporation (1998) Doing Better Business Through Effective Public Consultation and Disclosure. Washington, D.C.: International Finance Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., R. Gulate, N. Nohria (1994) Alliances as Learning Races, in Academy of Management Proceedings, D. Moore ed.; 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C.R., H.J. Van Buren III (1999) Organisational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24 (3): 538–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt-Siva, J., L.C. Soileau IV, D.W. Chamberlain, M.L. Wouch (1996) Engineering for Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Oil Operations in a Rainforest, in Engineering Within Ecological Constraints P.C. Schulze ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, F., M. Arnold (1995) The Power of Environmental Partnerships. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P., A.H. Barbosa, N. Zaidenweber, P. Fernandez-Davila, V. Goncalves da Vinha (1999a) Corporate Roles and Rewards in Promoting Sustainable Development: Lessons and Guidelines from Camisea, Research Report, ERG-99–1, Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P., A.H. Barbosa, N. Zaidenweber, P. Fernandez-Davila, V. Goncalves da Vinha (1999b) Royal Dutch Shell Sustainability Strategy, in Corporate Incentives and Environmental Decision Making M. Hastings ed. The Woodlands, Texas: Houston Advanced Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., S. Ghoshal (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organisational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Financial Strategies Found Among Top 10 Oil and Gas Firms. Oil & Gas Journal 1998, 96 (16): 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J.A., R.F. Scherer, J.D. Brokzinski, J.F. Quinn, M.F. Ainina (1999) Global leadership skills and reputational capital: intangible resources for sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 13 (1): 58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., M.B. Fuller (1986) Coalitions and Global Strategy, in Competition in Global Industries. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., G. Hamel (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M., P. Fouts (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3): 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., H. Vredenburg (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organisational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2000) Stakeholder integration and corporate sustainability strategy: a dynamic capability perspective. Houston Advanced Research Center working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, A., R. Abbott, R. Boutilier, D. Wheeler (2001) Stakeholder relations: pathways to competitive advantage (draft). CA Magazine, August 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.A., S.B. Graves (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4): 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1997) Foreign petroleum companies developing new paradigm for operating in rainforest region. Oil & Gas Journal Special Issue: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J., B. Gray (1991) Collaborative alliances: moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 27 (1): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hastings, M. (2002). Neither Satan nor Santa. In: de Bruijn, T.J.N.M., Tukker, A. (eds) Partnership and Leadership. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2545-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2545-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5938-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2545-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics