Abstract
Nietzsche’s ideas on causality are at the very centre of his reflections on epistemological and ontological problems in the final phase of his philosophical activity. Remarks on this topic can be found both throughout his later published writings and in the notebooks of the 1880’s.1 In what follows I shall offer an interpretation of the prominent “sceptical” line of thought expressed in these remarks and of its relation to Nietzsche’s sometimes perplexing criticisms of the “so-called purely mechanical forces of attraction and repulsion” (WP 621) introduced into modern physics by Newton and Boscovich. It would be presumptuous to claim that the considerations I shall endeavour to isolate and partly to re-construct represent all Nietzsche has to say on the subject of causation — for one thing, his remarks concerning volitional causation will only superficially be touched upon — but they do seem to me to contain some of his most interesting insights into the nature and limitations of the modern scientific enterprise, and they form the immediate background to his own prima facie ontological ideas which figure so conspicuously in the notebooks of the 1880’s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
References are given in the text to Friedrich Nietzsche, Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, eds. G. Colli and M. Montinari (Berlin, 1967-) KGW. Friedrich Nietzsche. The Will to Power, ed. W. Kaufmann ( New York. 1968 ). Trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale.
David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford, 1975), 165.
Cf. William James, Principles of Psychology (New York, 1950), 2 vols. vol. ii, 634f.
Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations (London, 1963), 46–8.
E.g. GS 355; KGW VIIL1.5.10; KGW VII.3.34.246.
The contrast I have in mind here is with formal analogies, a distinction analysed in detail by M. Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science (Notre Dame, 1966), 60–70.
This interpretation of Nietzsche’s criticism of theories of volitional causality is shared by A. Mittasch in his classic commentary on Nietzsche’s physics, Friedrich Nietzsche als Naturphilosoph (Stuttgart, 1952), 227.
Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science (London, 1961), 59.
H.R. Harré and E.H. Madden, Causal Powers (Oxford, 1975 ), 30.
Cf. Galen Strawson, The Secret Connexion (Oxford, 1989), 20–31.
A more radical rejection of the Nietzschean conception of adequate explanation would be one that denies that any qualities figure in “objective reality” — as opposed to “subjective” registerings of it — at all. Nietzsche briskly dismisses a quasi-Pythagorean conception of objective reality in exclusively formal or quantitative terms as unintelligible: “The reduction of all qualities to quantities is nonsense” (WP 564).
K. Schlechta and A. Anders, Friedrich Nietzsche — Von den verborgenen Anfängen seines Philosophierens, (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt, 1962 ), 136.
R. Boscovich, A Theory of Natural Philosophy (Chicago, 1922), 65.
See e.g. G.W. Leibniz, “Primary Truths,” in G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.), Philosophical Writings (London, 1973 ), 91.
John Locke, Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,in The Works of John Locke, i (London, 1874), ILviii.23.
For the precedents mentioned here, see G. Berkeley, “Of Motion,” in M.R. Ayers (ed.), Philosophical Works (London, 1993), 255–276; A. Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation (New York, 1966), 2 vols., vol. i, 112–124; F.A. Lange,Geschichte des Materialismus (Iserlohn, 1866)„ 360f. The latter two works are likely to have directly influenced Nietzsche’s thinking on the subject.
C.D. Broad, Scientific Thought (London., 1923), 162–3.
Robert Boyle, “The Origins of Forms and Qualities,” in M.A. Stewart (ed.), Selected Philosophical Papers (Manchester, 1979 ), 67.
I have offered a detailed interpretation of Nietzsche’s development of this thought in my Nietzsche and Metaphysics,(Oxford, 1995)., 267–288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poellner, P. (1999). Causation and Force in Nietzsche. In: Babich, B.E. (eds) Nietzsche, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 204. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2428-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2428-9_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5234-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2428-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive