Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 204))

Abstract

Nietzsche’s ideas on causality are at the very centre of his reflections on epistemological and ontological problems in the final phase of his philosophical activity. Remarks on this topic can be found both throughout his later published writings and in the notebooks of the 1880’s.1 In what follows I shall offer an interpretation of the prominent “sceptical” line of thought expressed in these remarks and of its relation to Nietzsche’s sometimes perplexing criticisms of the “so-called purely mechanical forces of attraction and repulsion” (WP 621) introduced into modern physics by Newton and Boscovich. It would be presumptuous to claim that the considerations I shall endeavour to isolate and partly to re-construct represent all Nietzsche has to say on the subject of causation — for one thing, his remarks concerning volitional causation will only superficially be touched upon — but they do seem to me to contain some of his most interesting insights into the nature and limitations of the modern scientific enterprise, and they form the immediate background to his own prima facie ontological ideas which figure so conspicuously in the notebooks of the 1880’s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. References are given in the text to Friedrich Nietzsche, Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, eds. G. Colli and M. Montinari (Berlin, 1967-) KGW. Friedrich Nietzsche. The Will to Power, ed. W. Kaufmann ( New York. 1968 ). Trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford, 1975), 165.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. William James, Principles of Psychology (New York, 1950), 2 vols. vol. ii, 634f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations (London, 1963), 46–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.g. GS 355; KGW VIIL1.5.10; KGW VII.3.34.246.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The contrast I have in mind here is with formal analogies, a distinction analysed in detail by M. Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science (Notre Dame, 1966), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This interpretation of Nietzsche’s criticism of theories of volitional causality is shared by A. Mittasch in his classic commentary on Nietzsche’s physics, Friedrich Nietzsche als Naturphilosoph (Stuttgart, 1952), 227.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science (London, 1961), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.R. Harré and E.H. Madden, Causal Powers (Oxford, 1975 ), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. Galen Strawson, The Secret Connexion (Oxford, 1989), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A more radical rejection of the Nietzschean conception of adequate explanation would be one that denies that any qualities figure in “objective reality” — as opposed to “subjective” registerings of it — at all. Nietzsche briskly dismisses a quasi-Pythagorean conception of objective reality in exclusively formal or quantitative terms as unintelligible: “The reduction of all qualities to quantities is nonsense” (WP 564).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Schlechta and A. Anders, Friedrich Nietzsche — Von den verborgenen Anfängen seines Philosophierens, (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt, 1962 ), 136.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Boscovich, A Theory of Natural Philosophy (Chicago, 1922), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See e.g. G.W. Leibniz, “Primary Truths,” in G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.), Philosophical Writings (London, 1973 ), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Locke, Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,in The Works of John Locke, i (London, 1874), ILviii.23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. For the precedents mentioned here, see G. Berkeley, “Of Motion,” in M.R. Ayers (ed.), Philosophical Works (London, 1993), 255–276; A. Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation (New York, 1966), 2 vols., vol. i, 112–124; F.A. Lange,Geschichte des Materialismus (Iserlohn, 1866)„ 360f. The latter two works are likely to have directly influenced Nietzsche’s thinking on the subject.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C.D. Broad, Scientific Thought (London., 1923), 162–3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robert Boyle, “The Origins of Forms and Qualities,” in M.A. Stewart (ed.), Selected Philosophical Papers (Manchester, 1979 ), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I have offered a detailed interpretation of Nietzsche’s development of this thought in my Nietzsche and Metaphysics,(Oxford, 1995)., 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poellner, P. (1999). Causation and Force in Nietzsche. In: Babich, B.E. (eds) Nietzsche, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 204. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2428-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2428-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5234-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2428-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics