Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hardwood silvopasture management in North America

  • Chapter
New Vistas in Agroforestry

Part of the book series: Advances in Agroforestry ((ADAG,volume 1))

Abstract

Hardwood silvopasture management has great potential throughout the Central Hardwood Region in the United States, but has been little utilized due to the lack of available information on its application. However, more than one-third of farm woodlands within the region are being grazed without the benefit of the application of silvopasture principles. The University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry has undertaken a major research initiative to further develop and build upon the fragmented information that is available on hardwood silvopastoral management. Ten years of screening forage species (grasses and legumes) for shade tolerance has clearly demonstrated that many cool-season forages benefit from 40% to 60% shade when grown in Missouri — a finding that could likely be extrapolated to the entire region of the Midwestern United States. Grazing trials have proven to be successful in the short-term. Long-term research is currently underway to fully document the interactions between hardwood trees, cattle and forage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alavalapati J., Shrestha R.K., Stainback G.A. and Matta J.R. 2004. Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective (This volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard G., Nelson C.J. and Pallardy S.G. 1991. Shade effects on growth of tall fescue: I. Leaf anatomy and dry matter partition-ing. Crop Sci 31: 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezkorowajnyj P.G., Gordon A.M. and McBride R.A. 1993. The effect of cattle foot traffic on soil compaction in a silvopastoral system. Agroforest Syst 21: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman K.A. 1955. Epicormic branching on oaks in sprout stands. Technical Paper 146. Research Paper, NE-47. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Columbus, Ohio. 8 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright T.C. 1955. Responses of beef cattle to high ambient temperatures. J Anim Sci 14: 350–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler R.F. Jr. 1940. The influence of grazing upon certain soil and climatic conditions in farm woodlands. J Amer Soc Agron 32: 216–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clason T.R. 1999. Silvopastoral practices sustain timber and forage production in commercial loblolly pine plantations of northwest Louisiana, USA. Agroforest Syst 44: 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clason T.R. and Sharrow S.H. 2000. Silvopastoral practices. pp. 119–147. In: Garrett H.E., Rietveld W.J. and Fisher R.F. (eds), North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinch J.P. 1999. Economics of Irish forestry: Evaluating the returns to economy and society. The National Council for Forest Re-search and Development, University College of Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland, 276 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale M.E. 1968. Growth response from thinning young even-aged white oak stands. Research Paper NE-112. USDA, Forest Ser-vice, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 19 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale M.E. 1975. Effect of removing understory on growth of upland oak. Research Paper, NE-321. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 10 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale M.E. and Sonderman D.L. 1984. Effect of thinning on growth and potential quality of young white oak crop trees. USDA Forest service Research Paper NE-539. U.S. Dept. of Agricul-ture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DenUyl D. and Day R.K. 1934. Woodland carrying capacities and grazing injury studies. Purdue University Agr. Exp. Sta. Bulletin 391. Purdue University, Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • DenUyl D., Diller O.D. and Day R.K. 1938. The development of natural reproduction in previously grazed farm woods. Purdue Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 431. Purdue University, Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey D.C., J. Kabrick J, Grabner J. and Gold M. 2003. Restoring oaks in the Missouri River floodplain. pp. 8–20. In: Proceedings 29th Annual Hardwood Sym. Hardwood silviculture and sustain-ability: 2001 and beyond. May 17–19, 2001. French Lick, IN. National Hardwood Lumber Association. Memphis, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey D.C. and MacDonald G.B. 2001. Overstory Manipulation. pp. 157–175. In: Wagner R.G. and Colombo S.J. (eds), Regen-erating the Canadian Forest: Principles and Practice for Ontario. Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey D.C. and Parker W.C. 1996. Regeneration of Red Oak Using Shelterwood Systems: Ecophysiology, Silviculture and Manage-ment Recommendations. Ont. Min. Nat. Resour., Ont. For. Res. Inst. For. Res. Inf. Pap. 126. Ontario, Canada. 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich J.H. and Crosby J.S. 1960. Herbage production is related to hardwood crown cover. J Forestry 56: 564–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer B.C. 1979. Managing light in the selection method. pp. 43– 53. In: Proceedings Regenerating Oaks in Upland Hardwood Forests, The 1979 J.S. Wright For. Conf., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford C.W., Morrison I.M. and Wilson J.R. 1979. Temperature effects on lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose in tropical and temperate grasses. Aust J Agric Res 30: 621–633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frost W.E. and McDougald N.K. 1989. Tree canopy effects on herbaceous production of annual rangeland during drought. J Range Manage 42: 281–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner F.P., Pearce B.B. and Mitchell R.L. 1985. Physiology of crop plants. Iowa State University Press; Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett H.E. and Buck L. 1997. Agroforestry practice and policy in the United States of America. Forest Ecol Manag 91: 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett H.E. and Harper L.S. 1998. The science and practice of black walnut agroforestry in Missouri, USA: a temperate zone assessment. pp. 97–110. In: Buck L.E., Lassoie J.P. and Fernandes E.C.M. (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. CRC Press, New York, NY., 416 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett H.E., Buck L.E., Gold M.A., Hardesty L.H., Kurtz W.B., Lassoie J.P., Pearson H.A. and Slusher J.P. 1994. Agroforestry: An Integrated Land-Use Management System for Production and Farmland Conservation. USDA SCS, Washington, D.C., 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett H.E. and Kurtz W.B. 1983. Silvicultural and economic relationships of integrated forestry farming with black walnut. Agroforest Syst 1: 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman D., Gonzalez M. and Bay D.M. 1999. 1997 Census of agriculture–State data. United States Department of Agriculture: National Agricultural Statistics Service. Vol. 1 Geographic Area Series, Part 51, USDA AC97-A-51. Washington, D.C., 530 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godsey L.D. 2000. Economic budgeting for agroforestry practices. Agroforestry in Action #3–2000, University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO., 16 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grado S.C., Hovermale C.H. and St. Louis D.G. 1998. A preliminary economic assessment of a silvopastoral system in south Mississippi. In: Proc., Southern Agroforestry Conference, Huntsville, AL. October 19–21, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grado S.C., Hovermale C.H. and St. Louis D.G. 2001. A financial analysis of a silvopasture system in southern Mississippi. Agroforest Syst 53: 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall L.M., George M.R., McCreary D.D. and Adams T.E. 1992. Effects of cattle grazing on blue oak seedling damage and survival. J Range Manage 45: 503–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwell R.L. and Dangerfield C.W. Jr. 1990. Sustaining use on marginal land: Agroforestry in the Southeast. pp. 212–220. In: Williams P. (ed.), Agroforestry in North America: Proceedings of the First Conference on Agroforestry in North America, 13– 16 August, 1989, Department of Environmental Biology, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley R.C. and Stickel P.W. 1948. Protection against domestic animals: grazing. pp. 240–256. In: Forest Protection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey F. A. 1991. The extent, nature and impact of domestic livestock grazing on Missouri woodlands. pp. 248–255. In: Garrett ‘Gene’ H.E. Garrett (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Agroforestry in North America; Springfield, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintz D.L. 1983. Benefits associated with feedlot and livestock windbreaks. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Midwest National Technical Center, Technical Note 190-LI-1, 15 pp. Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek J.L., Vavra M. and Skovlin J. 1981. Diet quality and performance of cattle on forest and grassland range. J Anim Sci 53: 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck M.B., Kerley M.S., Garrett H.E., McGraw R.L., Van Sambeek J.W. and Navarrete-Tindall N.E. 2001. Effect of shade on forage quality. pp. 125–135. In: Schroeder W. and Kort J. (eds), Proc of 7th North American Conf. on Agroforestry in North America. Saskatchewan, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak A.L. and Grado S.C. 2001. Monetary and wildlife benefits in a silvopastoral system. pp. 167–175. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Southern Forest Economics Workshop. Lexington, KY. March 28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay B.L. 1987. Long-term effects of blue oak removal on forage production, forage quality, soil, and oak regeneration. pp. 351–357. In: Proc. Symp. Multiple Use of California’s Hardwood Resources. USDA Forest Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-100. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Expt. Station, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly C.F., Bond T.E. and Ittner N.R. 1950. Thermal design of livestock shades. Agr. Eng. 31: 601–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart K.D. and Buxton D.R. 1993. Forage quality responses of cool and warm perennial grasses to shade. Crop Sci. 33: 831– 837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart K.D., Buxton D.R. and Taylor S.E. 1992. Growth of cool and warm season perennial grasses in reduced irradiance. Crop Sci. 32: 1033–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch N.E. and Kennedy J.J. 1991. Multiple-use forestry for social values. Ambio V. 20: 330–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz W.B., Garrett H.E., Slusher J.P. and Osburnj D.B. 1996. Economics of agroforestry. MU Guide, Forestry #G 5021, University of Missouri Extension, University of Missouri-Columbia, 2 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamson N.I., Smith H.C., Perkey A.W. and Brock S.M. 1990. Crown release increases growth of crop trees. Research Paper, NE-635. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 8 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantagne D.O. 1991. Tree shelters increase heights of planted northern red oaks. Proceedings 8th Central Hardwood Conference, USDA, Forest Svc. GTR-NE-148. pp. 291–298. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhler J., Felton E.E.D., Schmidt D.A., Bader K.J., Moore A., Huck M.B., Garrett H.E. and Kerley M.S. 2003. Cattle performance and tree damage using various tree protection methods during tree establishment. Agroforest Syst 59: 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhler J.W., Kerley M.S., Garrett H.E., Cutter B.E. and McGraw R.L. 1999. Comparison of continuous and rotational silvopastoral systems for established walnut plantations in southwest Missouri, USA. Agroforest Syst 44: 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C.H., McGraw R.L., George M.F. and Garrett H.E. 1999. Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices. Agroforest Syst 44: 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C.H., R.L. McGraw R.L., George M.F. and Garrett H.E. 2001. Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agroforest Syst 53: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace W. 1998. The root protection method (RPM) system for producing container trees. Combined Proceedings International Plant Propagators ’ Society. 48: 556–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R.R. 1992. Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a coastal plain riparian forest. J Environ Qual 21: 401–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren G.K., Connor J.R. and Pearson H.A. 1983. An economic analysis of forest grazing on four timber management situations. South J Appl For 7: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis D.A. 1988. Guidelines for regenerating cherry-maple stands. pp. 167–188. In: Smith H.C., Perkey A.W. and Kidd W.E. Jr. (eds), Proceedings, Guidelines for Regenerating Appalachian Hardwood Stands, 24–26 May 1988, Morgantown, W.Va Soc. Am. Pub. 88–03.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary D.D. and Tecklin J. 2001. The effects of different sizes of tree shelters on blue oak growth. West J Appl For 16: 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel A.H. and Roark C.B. 1956. Performance and grazing habits of Hereford and Aberdeen-angus cows and calves on im-proved pastures as related to types of shade. J Anim Sci 15: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvain E.H. and Shoop M.C. 1971. Shade for improving cattle gains and rangeland use. J Range Manage 24: 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minckler Leon S. 1961. Measuring light in uneven-aged hardwood stands. Technical Paper 184. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Central States Forest Experiment Station. St. Paul, MN., 9 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minter W.F., Myers R.K. and Fischer B.C. 1992. Effects of tree shelters on northern red oak seedlings planted in harvested forest openings. North J Appl Forest 9: 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An under-exploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems (This volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C.J.C., Botha J.A., Smith W.A. and Coetzer W.A. 1994. Production, physiological and behavioral responses of lactating friesian cows to a shade structure in a temperate climate. In: Budklin R. (ed.), Dairy Systems for the 21st Century. Proceed-ings, Third International Dairy Housing Conference. February 2–5, 1994, Orlando, FL. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. and Nair V.D. 2003. Carbon Storage in North American Agroforestry Systems. pp. 333–346. In: Kimble J., Heath L.S., Birdsey R.A. and Lal R. (eds), The Potential of U.S. Forest Soils to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair V.D. and Graetz D.A. 2004. Agroforestry as an approach to minimizing nutrient loss from heavily fertilized soils: The Florida experience (This volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neel L.R. 1939. The effect of shade on pasture. Tenn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Circular #65, 2 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noweg T.A. and Kurtz W.B. 1987. Eastern black walnut plantations: An economically viable option for conservation reserve lands within the corn belt. North J Appl Forest 4: 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrofsky R.S., Seymour R.S. and Lemin Jr. R.C.. 1986. Damage to northern hardwoods from thinnings using whole-tree harvesting technology. Can. J Forest Res 16: 1238–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcell J. 2000. Carbon sequestration and its value for Mis-souri producers. Online publication http://agebb.missouri.edu/ mgt/carbon.htm [Last accessed November 20, 2001].

    Google Scholar 

  • Patric J.H. and Helvey J.D. 1986. Some effects of grazing on soil and water in the eastern forest. NE-GTR-115. Bromall, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 25 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson H.A. 1990. Silvopasture: Forest grazing and agroforestry in the southern coastal plain. pp. 25–42. Proceedings of Practical Agroforestry in the Mid-South Conference. West Memphis, AR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raedeke A., Green J., Hodge S. and Valdivia C. 2003. Farmers, the practice of farming and the future of agroforestry: An application of Bourdieu’s concept of field and habitus. Rural Sociol 68: 64– 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts E.N. 1926. Wyoming forage plants and their chemical com-position studies. No. 7. Effects of altitude, seasonal variation, and shading experiments. Wyoming Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander I.L. 1979. Regenerating oaks with the shelterwood system. pp. 54–60. In: Proceedings Regenerating Oaks in Upland Hard-

    Google Scholar 

  • wood Forests, The 1979 J.S. Wright For. Conf., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger R.C. 1978. Increased growth of released white oak poles continues through two decades. J Forest 76: 726–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifley S.R. and Sullivan N.H. 2002. The status of timber resources in the North Central United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-228. St. Paul, MN: USDA, Forest Service, N.C. Res. Sta. 47 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigo A.L. 1966. Decay and discoloration following logging wounds on northern hardwoods. Research Paper, NE-47. Up-per Darby, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 43 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith W.B., Vissage J.S., Darr D.R., Sheffield R.M. 2001. Forest resources of the United States, 1997. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-219. St. Paul, MN. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 190 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H.C. and Miller G.W. 1991. Releasing 75- to 80-year-old Appalachian hardwood sawtimber trees: 5-year d.b.h. response. pp. 402–413. In: McCormick L.H. and Gottschalk K.W. (eds), 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H.C. 1966. Epicormic branching on eight species of Ap-palachian hardwoods. Research Note, NE-53. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 4 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.M. 1942. Some effects of black locusts and black walnuts on southeastern Ohio pastures. Soil Sci 53: 385–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spain J.N., Zulovich J. and Hardin D.K. 1997. Heat stress on a commercial dairy farm: An economic evaluation of cooling. pp. 936–941. In: Botcher R.W. and Hoff S.J. (eds), Livestock Environment V, Volume II, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium, May 29–31, 1997. Bloomington, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standiford R.B. and Howitt R.E. 1993. Multiple use management of California’s hardwood rangelands. J Range Manage 46: 176– 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson W.H. 1954. North Carolina’s beef, pork and poultry trade. pp. 107–109. A Basic History of the Old South. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes B.J., Kluender R.A., Klepac J.F. and Lortz D.A. 1995. Harvesting impacts as a function of removal intensity. pp. 207– 216. In: X X IUFRO World Congress on Forest Operations and Environmental Protection. Tampere, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tassell L.W., Bartlett E.T. and Mitchell J.E. 2001. Projected use of grazed forages in the United States: 2000 to 2050: A technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA As-sessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-82. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, 73 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward W.W. 1966. Epicormic branching of black and white oaks. Forest Sci 12: 290–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster A.J.F. 1970. Direct effects of cold weather on the energetic efficiency of beef production in different regions of Canada. Can J Anim Sci 50: 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters G.L. 1973. Southern pine overstories influence herbage quality. J Range Manage 26: 423–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worstell D.M. and Brody S. 1953. Environmental physiology and shelter engineering. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. #515. Univer-sity of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan F.C. and Mercer D.E. 1997. An assessment of agroforestry systems in the southern USA. Agroforest Syst 35: 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    H. E. Garrett, M. S. Kerley, K. P. Ladyman, W. D. Walter & L. D. Godsey

  2. North Central Research Station, US Forest Service, Columbia, MO, USA

    J. W. Van Sambeek

  3. Dale Bumpers, Small Family Farm Research Center, Booneville, AR, USA

    D. K. Brauer

Authors
  1. H. E. Garrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. S. Kerley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. P. Ladyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. D. Walter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. D. Godsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. W. Van Sambeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. K. Brauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. E. Garrett .

Editor information

P. K. R. Nair M. R. Rao L. E. Buck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrett, H.E. et al. (2004). Hardwood silvopasture management in North America. In: Nair, P.K.R., Rao, M.R., Buck, L.E. (eds) New Vistas in Agroforestry. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6673-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2424-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation