Abstract
Virtually all studies of colour naming take place in the context of some idealized, two-dimensional representation of the colour space. The Munsell-based chip set has been mentioned. Other arrays with slightly different ordering principles have been utilized. These arrays (and there are many others beyond those deemed appropriate by anthropologists and linguists and psychologists) are conventional in the sense that differences among them reflect the different aims and purposes of their constructors. Nevertheless, arrays which are intended to represent the visual properties of colour—hue, saturation, and lightness—are based on similarity. As the philosopher Jonathan Westphal says of one standard representation, the double cone, “It is a significant fact that the overall order flows from one principle alone. Colours are to be placed near to one another according to relative similarity” (Westphal 1988, p. 121).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dedrick, D. (1998). The Non-Naturalness of Colour Categories. In: Naming the Rainbow. Synthese Library, vol 274. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2382-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2382-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5094-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2382-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive