Abstract
Germany, Europe’s monetary anchor: what could have been more inconceivable just after the Second World War, when the European countries, struggling with colossal overliquidity consequent on the forced financing of Germany’s war efforts, the contraction of the real economic sector and the bilateral balance-of-payments surpluses vis-à-vis Germany, were compelled to undertake currency reforms? Yet Germany became Europe’s monetary anchor, thanks to the vigour of its economic build-up during the 1950s and 1960s, and its monetary authorities’ quest for stability. Thanks also to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in the early i970s, which created a need for a new anchor for the European exchange rates; the predominance of the German economy made the Deutsche mark the obvious choice.
‘Of Germany’s partners, the Dutch monetary authorities above all appreciate the importance of Germany’s stability-orientedpolicyfor the system. The role of the Deutsche mark as an anchor of stability. Maybe we realize more vividly than the other partners that, in the unlikely event that the Bundesbank could be persuaded to adopt another policy, the system would not be long-lived.’I
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1991), Shocking aspects of European monetary integration, NBER Working Paper, no. 3949, Cambridge (Massachusetts).
Berk, J. M. (1992), Conjuncturele vervlechting Nederland-Duitsland, De Nederlandsche Bank, Domestic Research Department Series, no. 146.
Bikker, J.A. (1993), A leading indicator of inflation for the Netherlands, De Nederlandsche Bank, Quarterly Bulletin 93/3, pp. 43–57.
Boot, D.H. (1992), Achter de coulissen van het beleid,Amsterdam.
Bruno, M. and J. Sachs (1985), The economics of world-wide stagflation,Oxford.
Eichengreen, B. (1990), Is Europe an optimum currency area? NBER Working Paper, no. 3579, Cambridge (Massachusetts).
Giavazzi, F. and M. Pagano (1988), The advantage of tying one’s hands: EMS discipline and central bank credibility, European Economic Review, vol. 3z, no. 5, pp. 1055–1075.
Paridon, C.W.A.M. van (1993), Persoonlijke relatie ofknellende band? Over economische ontwikkelingen in Duitsland en de invloed op Nederland,inaugural lecture on the occasion of assuming to the office of professor at the University of Amsterdam (vu).
Puchinger, G. (1978), DrJelle Zijlstra, gesprekken en geschriften,Naarden.
Rutten, F.W. (1987), Bijsturen van de economie, Economisch Statistische Berichten, no. 3136, PP. 4–7.
Szâsz, A. (1988), Monetaire diplomatie: Nederlands internationale monetaire politick 1958–1987, Doctoral thesis, Leiden/Antwerpen.
Szâsz, A. (1989), Monetary policy in the European Community from the viewpoint of the Nederlandsche Bank, De Nederladsche Bank, Quarterly Bulletin 89/I, pp. zi-z7.
Wellink, A.H.E.M. (1985), In praise of price movements, De Nederlandsche Bank, Quarterley Bulletin 1985 /3, pp. 31–36.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wellink, N. (1994). The economic and monetary relation between Germany and the Netherlands. In: Monetary Stability through International Cooperation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2358-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2358-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-2360-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2358-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive