Skip to main content

How the Method of Minimization of Action Avoids Singularities

  • Conference paper
Modern Celestial Mechanics: From Theory to Applications

Abstract

The method of minimization of action is a powerful technique of proving the existence of particular and interesting solutions of the n-body problem, but it suffers from the possible interference of singularities. The minimization of action is an optimization and, after a short presentation of a few optimization theories, our analysis of interference of singularities will show that:

  1. (A)

    An n-body solution minimizing the action between given boundary conditions has no discontinuity: all n-bodies have a continuous and bounded motion and thus all eventual singularities are collisions;

  2. (B)

    A beautiful extension of Lambert’s theorem shows that, for these minimizing solutions, no double collision can occur at an intermediate time;

  3. (C)

    The proof can be extended to triple and to multiple collisions. Thus, the method of minimization of action leads to pure n-body motions without singularity at any intermediate time, even if one or several collisions are imposed at initial and/or final times.

This method is suitable for non-infinitesimal masses only. Fortunately, a similar method, with the same general property with respect to the singularities, can be extended to n-body problems including infinitesimal masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chenciner, A. and Montgomery, R.: 1999, A Remarkable Periodic Solution of the Three-body Problem in the Case of Three Equal Masses. Northwestern University, Evanston conference on Celestial Mechanics, December 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marchal, C.: 2001, ‘The family P 12 of the three-body problem. The simplest family of periodic orbits, with twelve symmetries per period’, Celest. Mech. & Dyn. Astr. 78, 279. Also ONERA TP n° 2000–2099.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hohmann, W.: 1925, Die Erreichbarkeit der Himmelskörper, Oldenbourg, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weierstrass, K. T. W.: 1920, Variationrechnung, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Vol. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bliss, G. A.: 1946, Lectures on the Calculus of Variations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–292.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Contensou, P.: 1946, ‘Note sur la cinématique générale du mobile dirigé’, Comm. Assoc. Techn. Maritime et Aéron. 45, n° 836.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawden, D. F.: 1950, ‘Minimal trajectories’, J. Brit. Interplan. Soc. 9, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breakwell, J. V.: 1959, ‘The optimization of trajectories’, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 7, 215–247.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pontryagin, L. S., Boltyanskii, V. G., Gamkrelidze, R. V. and Mishchenko, E. F.: 1962, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, Interscience Publishers, New York, pp. 75–114.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marchal, C.: 1971, Recherches théoriques en optimisation déterministe, ONERA Publ. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marchal, C.: 1972, ‘The bi-canonical systems’, In: A. V. Balakrishnan (ed.), Techniques of Optimization, Academic Press, New York, pp. 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchal, C.: 1973, ‘Chattering arcs and chattering controls: (Survey paper), J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. 11, 441–468.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marchal, C.: 1975, ‘Second order tests in optimization theories’ (Survey paper), J. Optimiz. Theory Appl., 15, 633–666.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marchal, C.: 1976, ‘Optimization of space trajectories’, Survey paper, In: 27th Intern. Astronaut. Cong., Anaheim California, October 10–16. Also ONERA T.P. n° 1976–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marchal, C. and Contensou P.: 1981, ‘Singularities in optimization of deterministic dynamic systems’, J. Guid. & Cont 4, 240–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchal, C.: 1990, The Three-body Problem, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marchal, C. (2002). How the Method of Minimization of Action Avoids Singularities. In: Celletti, A., Ferraz-Mello, S., Henrard, J. (eds) Modern Celestial Mechanics: From Theory to Applications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2304-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2304-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6078-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2304-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics