Abstract
For the purposes of the present paper it would be helpful — though with the risk of some degree of over-simplification — to group the various theoretical studies which underlie research on decision-making under two broad and relatively distinct headings, as reflected in the title of the conference which brings us together today.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allais (M.), Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine, Econometrica 1953, 21, 503–546.
Aschenbrenner (K.M.), Bockenholt (V.), Albert (D.), Schmalhofer (F.), The selection of dimensions when choosing between multiattribute alternatives, in (R.W.) Scholtz (Ed), Current issues in West German Decision Research Frankfurt, Lang, 1986.
Beyth-Marom (R.), Fischhof (B.), Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45, 1185–1195.
Cadet (B.), Le diagnostic comme activité cognitive d’expertise, Psychologie Médicale 1991, 23, 141–146.
De Finetti (B.), Theory of probability: a critical introductory treatment Vol. 1, New York, Wiley, 1974.
Edwards (W.), The theory of decision making, Psychological Bulletin 1954, 51, 380–417.
Edwards (W.), Behavioral decision theory, Annual Review of Psychology 1961, 12, 473–498.
Edwards (W.), How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making ?, IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man and Cybernetics 1977, SMC-7 326–340.
Edwards (W.); Newman (J.R.), Multiattribute Evaluation Beverly Hills, Sage, 1982.
Eiser (J.R.), Prise de risque social, conservatisme et piège social, Bulletin de Psychologie 1988, 41, 186–192.
Hammond (K.R.), Functionalism and illusionism: Can integration be usefully achieved ? in (R.M.) HOGARTH (Ed), Insights in decision making. A tribute to Hillel J. EINHORN Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Hogarth (R.M.), Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions, Tournal of the American Statistical Association 1975, 350, 271–289.
Kahneman (D.), Tversky (A.), Choice, values and frames, American psychologist 1984, 39, 341–350.
Koffka (K.), Principles of Gestalt Psychology New York, Harcourt Brace, 1935.
Kohler (W.), Dynamics in Psychology New York, Liveright, 1940.
Lichtenstein (S.), Slovic (P.), Response-induced reversal of preference in gambling decision: An extended replication in Las Vegas, Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 101, 16–20.
Lindley (D.V.), Making decisions New York, Wiley, 1971, Second Edition 1985.
Luce (R.D.), Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis New York, Wiley, 1959.
Maule (J.A.), Positive and negative decision frame: a verbal protocol analysis of the Asian disease problem of TVERSKY and KAHNEMAN, in (H.) MONTGOMERY and (O.) SVENSON (Eds), Process and structure in human decision making New York, Wiley, 1989.
Meehl (P.E.), Clinical vs Statistical Prediction: A theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1954.
Montgomery (H.), Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: towards a process model of decision-making, in (P.C.) Humphreys, (O.) Svenson and (A.) Vari (Eds), Analysing and aiding decision processes Amsterdam, North Holland, 1983.
Montgomery (H.), From cognition to action: the search for dominance in decision making, in (H.) MONTGOMERY and (O.) SVENSON (Eds), Process and structure in human decision making New York, Wiley, 1989.
Raiffa (H.), Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choice under Uncertainty Reading Massachusetts, Addison Wesley, 1968.
Savage (L.J.), The foundations of statistics New York, Wiley, 1954.
Slovic (P.), Information processing. situation specificity and the generality of risk taking behavior Report of the Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon, 1971.
Slovic (P.), Lichtenstein (S.), Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk-taking, Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968a, 78, 1–18.
Slovic (P.), Lichtenstein (S.), Importance of variance preferences in gambling decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968b, 78, 646–654.
Svenson (O.), Process description of decision making, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1979, 23, 86–112.
Sundstroem (G.), Information search and decision making: The effets of information displays, in (H.) MONTGOMERY and (O.) SVENSON, Process and structure in human decision making. New York Wiley, 1989.
Tversky (A.), Intransitivity of preferences, Psychological Review 1969, 76, 31–48.
Tversky (A.), Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice, Psychological Review 1972, 79, 281–299.
Tversky (A.), Kahneman (D.), The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 1981, 211, 453–458.
Tversky (A.), Kahneman (D.), Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment, Psychological Review 1983, 293–315.
Tyszka (T), Variability of predecisional information seeking behavior, Polish Psychological Bulletin 1985, 76, 275–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cadet, B. (1994). Contextual Effects and the Influence of the Frame on Decision Making. In: Munier, B., Machina, M.J. (eds) Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality. Theory and Decision Library, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2298-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2298-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4447-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2298-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive