Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Mental Health

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 9))

Abstract

In the sixties and seventies there was an intense debate among philosophers, sociologists, psychiatrists, and others about whether or not there is, strictly speaking, such a thing as mental illness. As a model for illness was taken a certain view of somatic illness (or disease1). Adherents of this view, baptized “the medical model”, claimed that a disease is a subnormal functioning of a part, a function, or an organ of the body. Accordingly, there cannot be anything like “mental illness”, but only some physical lesion in the brain. This was, for instance, Thomas Szasz’s view.2 He claimed that all talk of mental illness was metaphorical and, thus, that much of what was called mental illness in fact was no illness at all. Instead he spoke of “problems in living”. These problems were not medical and should therefore not be treated by physicians or psychiatrists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Few people at this time made the today common distinction between disease, as standing for the pathological process, and illness, as the subjective experience of disease (and similar conditions).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vatz and Weinberg 1983, Szasz 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Reznek 1991, pp. 40-52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I take it that what Szasz calls “illness” is what Eysenck calls “disease”.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laing 1967, Scheff 1966, Foucault 1965, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a similar view, see Hacking 1986, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Svensson 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The closest I have come, so far, are Andreas Heinz 1994 and Mark Pestana 1998. However, I must admit that I have not been able to go through much material written in other languages than the Scandinavian and in English. Note also that I am not claiming that psychologists cannot make philosophical contributions in a discussion like this. However, in general, psychologists (psychoanalysts, psychiatrists, etc.) do not primarily focus on the philosophical or conceptual problems.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Some of them are: Boorse 1976, Hartmann 1960, 1981, Macklin 1972, Brown 1977, Toulmin 1978, Redlich 1952, 1981, and Taylor and Brown 1988. Some of these articles are found in Caplan, Engelhardt and McCartney 1981. Engelhardt and Spicker 1978 also includes papers devoted to this topic.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I am here taking for granted that the self-actualizing person Maslow is discussing is the mentally healthy person.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maslow’s main criterion was that he admired these people, and the reason for this admiration was mainly success. He admits that this is an unscientific method, but claims support from various other researchers. Now, even if this approach of choosing a class of people is unscientific, his study of them, he claims, is not (Maslow 1993, pp. 40–43 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jourard 1974, Coan 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jourard 1974, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Offer and Sabshin 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jahoda 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Observe that I will only discuss what constitutes mental health for adults. A developmental theory can of course be added to show how the different mental features are acquired through childhood and youth.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurt Danziger gives a striking account of the difference in psychological conceptualization within different cultures (Danziger 1997, pp. 1-5).

    Google Scholar 

  18. I say partly since there are probably some abilities that are necessary but not discussed in this book.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Camap 1971, pp. 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ayer 1991, pp. 44-45.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nordenfelt 1987, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The idea is that I need a folk psychological theory in order to state such “laws”.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See “The Goals of Medicine: Setting new priorities” 1996, and Nordenfelt and Tengland 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Redlich 1981, p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gelder et al. 1994, p. 827.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The numbers refer to the formal structure (pp. 4-5).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tengland, PA. (2001). Introduction. In: Mental Health. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2237-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2237-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5895-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2237-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics