Skip to main content

Wigmore Diagrams and Bayes Networks

  • Chapter
Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 53))

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

Formal techniqes for the analysis of decision problems such as Bayes networks and Influence Diagrams were anticipated by the famous lawyer John Henry Wigmore (1913) when lie devised charts for examining the structure of evidence in legal cases. We examine the relationship between these independently developed tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T. and Twining, W.,(1991) “Analysis of Evidence”, Weidenfeld and Nicholson

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carter, N., (1988) “Winning your case: structuring proof and closing evidentiary loopholes”, NZ Law Society

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawid, P., (1991) Appendix on Probability and Proof’ in Anderson, T. and Twining, W.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards, W., (1991) Influence diagrams, Bayesian imperialism, and the Collins case: an appeal to reason’ Cardozo Law Review, 13, 1025–1074

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver, R.M. and Smith, J.Q. (1990) Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis’ J Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson, B.W.N., (1990) Preparing to win — Analysing facts in legal cases, NZ Law Society

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schum, D. and Tillers, P., (1991) Marshalling evidence for adversary litigation’, Cardozo Law Review, 13, 657–704

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tillers, P., (1989) Webs of things in the mind: a new science of evidence’ Michigan Law Review, 87, 12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Twining, W., Taking facts seriously’, (1984) Journal of Legal Education, 34, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wigmore, J.H., (1913) The Science of judicial proof, Little, Brown and Co

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wright, S., (1921) Correlation and causation’ Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vignaux, G.A., Robertson, B. (1993). Wigmore Diagrams and Bayes Networks. In: Mohammad-Djafari, A., Demoment, G. (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2217-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2217-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4272-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2217-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics