Advertisement

Relp Analysis of the PCR-Amplified 28S Ribosomal DNA for Revision of Genetic Relationships in Rhizotonia Spp

  • Masaru Matsumoto
  • Nobukai Matsuyama
Chapter
  • 383 Downloads

Abstract

Phytopathogenic fungi classified as Rhizoctonia spp. represent an admixture of taxonomically separate groups that vary in many significant characteristics, including their sexual stages (teleomorph), asexual stages (anamorph), and other characters (Tu and Kimbrough, 1978; Sneh et al., 1991; Vilgalys and Cubeta, 1994). Understanding the genetic relationships is likely to aid in redefining the systematics of fungi described under the genus Rhizoctonia.

Keywords

Rhizoctonia Solani Anastomosis Group Unweighted Paired Group Method With Arithmetic Average Rice Sheath Blight RFLP Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burpee, L.L., Sanders, P.L., Cole, H.Jr. and Sherwood, R.T. (180) Anastomosis groups among isolates of Ceratobasidium cornigerum, Mycologia 72, 689–701.Google Scholar
  2. Cubeta, M.A., Echandi, E., Abernethy, T. and Vilgalis, R. (1990) Characterisation of anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia fungi using restriction analysis of ribosomal RNA genes, Phytopathology 80, 1008 (abstract).Google Scholar
  3. Cubeta M.A., E., Abernethy, T. and Vilgalis, R. (1991) Characterisation of anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia species using restriction analysis of an amplified ribosomal RNA gene, Phytopathology 81, 1390–1400.Google Scholar
  4. Damaj, M., Jabaji-Hare, S.H. and Charest, P.M. (1993) Isozyme variation and genetic relatedness in binucleate Rhizoctonia spp., Phytopathology 83, 864–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan, S., Barton, E.J. and Brien, A.P. (1993). Analysis of variation in isolates of Rhizoctonia solani by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay, Mycological Research 97, 1075–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunnel, P.S. and Webster, R.K. (1987) Ceratobasidium oryzae-sativae sp.nov.,the teleomorph of Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae and Ceratobasidium setariae comb. nov., the probabble teleomorph of Rhizoctonia Fumigata com.nov., Mycologia 79, 731–736.Google Scholar
  7. Liu, Z.L. and Sinclair, B.J. (1992) Genetic diversity of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2, Phytopathology 82, 778–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, Z.L. and Sinclair, B.J. 1993. Molecular differentiation of intrapsecific groups within anastomosis group I of Rhizoctonia solani, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 15, 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, Z.L. Domier,L.L. and Sinclair, B.J. 1993. ISG-specific ribosomal DNA polymorphism of th Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2, Mycologia 85, 795–800.Google Scholar
  10. Mastumoto,M., Furuya, N. and Matsuyama. N. (1996a) PCR.RFLP analysis of amplified 23S ribosomal DNA for identification of Rhizoctonia spp., the causal agents of sheath diseases of rice plants, Journal of Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University 41, 39–44.Google Scholar
  11. Matsumoot, M., Furuya, N., Takanami, Y. and Matsuyam, N. (1996) RFLP analysis of the PCR-amplified 28S rDNA in Rhizoctonia solani. Mycoscience 37, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ogoshi, A. (1976) Studies on the grouping of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn with hyphal anastomosis and on the perfect stages of groups, Bulletin of National Institute of Agriculture Science Service C30, 1–63.Google Scholar
  13. Ogoshi, A. (1987). Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, Annual Review of Phytopathology 25, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogoshi, A., Oniki, M.,Araki,T. and Ui, T. 91983). Studies on the anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia and their perfect states, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University 61, 244260.Google Scholar
  15. Ogoshi, A.Oniki, M., Sakai, R. and Ui, T. (1979). Anastomosis grouping among isolates of binucleate Rhizoctonia, Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 20, 33–39.Google Scholar
  16. Oniki, M., Ogoshi, A., Araki, T., Sakai, R. and Tanaka, S. (1985)., The perfect state of Rhizoctoniap oryzae and R.. zeae and the anastomosis groups of Waitea circinata, Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 20, 33–39.Google Scholar
  17. Sneh, B., Burpee, L.L. and Ogoshi, A., (1991) Identification of Rhizoctonia species, APS PRESS, St.Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  18. Tu, C.C. and Kimbrough, J. W. (1978) Systematic and phylogeny of fungi in the Rhizoctonia complex, Botanical Gazette 139, 454–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vilgalys, R. J.and Gonzakez, D. (1990) Ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length pollymorphisms in Rhizoctonia solani, Phytopathology 80, 151–158.Google Scholar
  20. Vilgalys, R. and Cubeta, M.A. (994). Molecular systematics and population biology of Rhizoctonia, Annual Review of Phytopathology 32, 135–155.Google Scholar
  21. Vilgalys, R. and Hester, M, (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species, Journal of Bacteriology 172, 4238–4246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Watanabe, B. and Matsuda, A. (1966). Studies on the grouping of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn pathogenic to upland crops, Bull. Appointed. Exp. 7, 1–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masaru Matsumoto
    • 1
  • Nobukai Matsuyama
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant PathologyFaculty of Agriculture, Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations